Poll: Ability scores - How intrinsic are they to D&D?

What is the importance of ability scores in D&D?

  • Very important; they should mechanically impact everything within reason.

    Votes: 48 60.0%
  • Important, but they should primarily serve to inform RP, not mechanics.

    Votes: 8 10.0%
  • Ability scores should be limited for mechanical reasons (ex. modifier bloat).

    Votes: 18 22.5%
  • Unimportant; D&D would still be D&D without them.

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Replace them with an alternative (for example, aspects from FATE).

    Votes: 4 5.0%
  • It all depends on specific implementation. I need more details.

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Other (please elaborate)

    Votes: 4 5.0%
  • The cake is a LIE!!! (Or I don't care.)

    Votes: 1 1.3%


log in or register to remove this ad


Ever since 3e unified ability score modifiers, I've wondered whether it's actually useful in any way to keep the scores themselves, since they're hardly used in any game element.

99% of the time, I don't need to know that my Strength score is 18 - I just need to know that I have a +4 bonus to Strength-related actions. So why not make the +4 the only entry for that ability?

I think I remember the designers wanting to do exactly that with some edition. Eventually, I think that's what will happen.
 

My recollection had the two "C's" being at the end - Str/Int/Wis/Dex/Con/Cha. Maybe it was a change from OD&D to Basic (which is where I started in the 70's).

Yep. OD&D was Str/Int/Wis/Con/Dex/Cha; Basic/AD&D went to Str/Int/Wis/Dex/Con/Cha; then 3E went to Str/Dex/Con/Int/Wis/Cha. The last is more useful, really, and the first is the original, but I'd agree the middle is "the classic".
 


Remove ads

Top