What name would you like the next iteration of D&D to bear? - Page 2





Poll: What name would you like to see on the cover of the new edition?

+ Log in or register to post
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 99
  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by drothgery View Post
    They tried the D&D (no qualifier) thing with both 3e and 4e. It didn't stick.
    I've been told this twice recently. It's just plain wrong.

    The cover of the /4e PHB says "Dungeons and Dragons" in big letters. Which version of it do you have?


    As does the /3e addition by the looks of this.

    So - show us a book with the brand name of the game being D&D for /3e or /4e.
    Note: That is different from a D&D logo existing which is also used to mark WoTC products.
    Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh

 

  • #12
    Potassium-Rich Moderator
    A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)

    Kamikaze Midget's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    13,133
    Blog Entries
    24

    ø Ignore Kamikaze Midget
    "Dungeons and Dragons" should be on the cover.

    People will call it 5e regardless, but first and foremost, the game is Dungeons and Dragons, and that's what we should call it.
    -- Jacob J Driscoll, Unsleeping---
    "A one inch mound of flesh with a scar running down it"

    PS5e v. 0.1: Faction Backgrounds
    Tieflings (& other planetouched) | Bariaur | Githzerai | Outcaste Modron
    FINAL FANTASY ZERO
    finalfantasyzero.wikidot.com

  • #13
    Registered User
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    Kravell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    178

    ø Ignore Kravell
    Wizards seems to be going after new players as well as existing players. So just calling Dungeons and Dragons makes the most sense. I think sticking 5E or 5th edition on the front would likely confuse returning players.

  • #14
    Names like "D&D Final" and "D&D Ultimate" are tricky. What happens, say, 10-15 years later, when "D&D Final" becomes all bloated and outdated and the core and supplements need be updated again with rules errata, consolidation, etc -- would that next iteration be called "D&D Final Ultimate This Time for Sure Re-Unified Compendium"?

  • #15
    The name "Dungeons and Dragons" is larger than just one edition. And no matter how all-encompassing they want this new edition to seem, it's still just one edition. The new edition needs to be called something other than just "Dungeons and Dragons" in order to differentiate it from the previous editions. My preference would be to stick with the naming convention that has already been established and call it 5th Edition. I know that's what I'm going to be calling it anyway....

  • #16
    Registered User
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    was's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,413
    D&D Next D&D Pathfinder GM's Day Gygax Memorial Fund

    ø Ignore was
    I like Ultimate Dungeons and Dragons

  • #17
    Registered User
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)

    drothgery's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    10,235
    Blog Entries
    3

    ø Ignore drothgery
    Quote Originally Posted by Anselyn View Post
    I've been told this twice recently. It's just plain wrong.
    When I say 'it didn't stick' I don't mean that WotC started putting an edition number in the logo (they never did that), or even on the cover (though they did with 3.5 and TSR did with 2e). I mean that players never used D&D (with no edition number) to refer to 3e or 4e.
    Dave Rothgery

    PBP
    Spoiler:

    My EnWorld Blog
    Republic and Empire
    Buffverse M&M game

    Characters
    Active
    Sanne Bacher d'Lyrandar in S@squ@tch's Against the Giants - Team Black

    Inactive
    Istara Kandorian in Ankh-Morpork Guard's Star Wars: Rebels with Style
    Eric Hassel (Quarterback) in Jemal's Mutant High
    Sariel in Rumspringa's Keep on the Shadowfell
    Khalia ir'Indari in DEFCON1's Eye of the Lich Queen
    Serrana Vao in Karl Green's Knights of the Old Republic (with 213 things Serrana can't do in the Jedi Order)
    Italimelk in Living ENWorld
    Daellin ir'Ayellan in stonegod's Expedition to Castle Ravenloft
    drothgery's Victorian Eberron game
    Star Wars/KotOR Era - The Second K'ril Incursion

  • #18
    Registered User
    Gallant (Lvl 3)

    broghammerj's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Fairway, KS
    Posts
    550

    ø Ignore broghammerj
    Dungeon and Dragons...it is what it is, although I would consider subtitles such as Dungeon and Dragons (A Mind Flaying Experience).
    "I don't want to kill you and you don't want to be dead." -Malachi 'Mal' Johnson

  • #19
    Registered User
    Gallant (Lvl 3)

    Tilenas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Twilight Hall
    Posts
    211

    ø Ignore Tilenas
    Right from when I heard they were trying to get everyone aboard with this edition, I realized that the perfect name would be
    Ultimate Dungeons & Dragons or UD&D.

    It also makes sense from a marketing POV, so I guess there's a real possibility of that being the title in the end. If nit, my hope would be "Dungeons & Dragons: Owlbears, Owlbears, Owlbears, Bugbears, Dire bears". Anything better than this horrible "D&D next", which doesn't make any freaking sense.
    Quote Originally Posted by RangerWickett View Post
    This led us to creating in our game "thunderdeath furywheat" because in 4th edition, normal wheat just isn't awesome enough.

  • #20
    Quote Originally Posted by drothgery View Post
    I mean that players never used D&D (with no edition number) to refer to 3e or 4e.
    Of course they did. Are you saying no one ever said - "Do you want to join our D&D group?", "Do you fancy playing D&D this weekend?" They _always_ stuck in an edition reference after the release of /3e? ??

    And, what I was saying - and still believe - is that WoTC could change the name to "D&D" and avoid the whole problematic Dungeons thing ...

    It works for M&Ms. Did the M and M ever stand for anything? Does it matter if they did?
    Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. I like the latest iteration
      By kitsune9 in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: Wednesday, 26th December, 2012, 04:35 PM
    2. WotC: Please do these 3 things for D&D's next iteration
      By CNYGamer99 in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Monday, 9th January, 2012, 09:48 PM
    3. WotC: Please do these 3 things for D&D's next iteration
      By CNYGamer99 in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Monday, 9th January, 2012, 09:48 PM
    4. Bear Warrior - Bear form and magic items
      By Dagredhel in forum D&D and Pathfinder
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: Thursday, 21st June, 2007, 04:44 PM
    5. Eberron Iteration - Orphans of Cyre
      By The803 in forum Talking the Talk
      Replies: 8
      Last Post: Tuesday, 12th December, 2006, 03:58 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •