5E My D&D Next Experience at DDXP
Page 1 of 14 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 132
  1. #1

    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)



    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    178

    My D&D Next Experience at DDXP

    Over the weekend, most of my gaming group and I traveled to Ft. Wayne to participate in the play test for D&D Next. Though I cannot reveal anything specific about the mechanics, I will attempt to relay our experience and impressions of the new game.

    First a bit of background. Our group plays 4E (but not Essentials) currently, and while we really enjoy it, there are a number of things most agree could stand to be reworked (feat/power bloat, magic items, immediate actions, hit points). I started over 25 years ago with Basic D&D, moved to 1E, then 2E, drifted to other games for most of the 90's and returned to D&D in a big way with 3.0 and 3.5. Of the others in attendance, two had started playing with 2E, two others with 3E, and one with 4E. The announcement of D&D Next was met with a near equal measure of excitement and trepidation. Some in our group (including myself) were more optimistic, while others more pessimistic. Regardless, we were all eager to test the new system.

    We sat down at the table and were very pleased to find out DM was Monte Cook. Characters were passed around, and most wound up playing a class they had played before and were familiar with. After a few minutes of reading over the character sheet and trying to get a general sense of our capabilities, Monte laid out the adventure.

    Monte is an excellent DM and he made the adventure fun and engaging. We won the day, kicking a lot of orc butt through luck, bold tactics, and good ideas. That said, a good DM can make just about any system enjoyable, for a while at least. About mid-way through I started to get bored with my character (and I normally love rogues) and my mind wandered.

    Combat was fast and deadly, but there are some oddly clunky mechanics that felt out of place to me. While I (who normally DMs) enjoyed that, there was a mixed response from the rest of the group. Not a single one of us was satisfied with how healing worked though. The mechanics are unusual and attempt to combine the approaches of a few editions, but it came off as a bit of a Frankenstein monster. One of us has a really good comment that nails it, but I think posting it would be at least bending the NDA... I'll say this much, it makes the adventuring day really feel like a work day.

    Perhaps the most crestfallen in our group were the ladies playing the cleric and wizard. The cleric player has roots in 3E, while the wizard started with 4E. Both felt the mechanics of the spells were counter-intuitive and confusing, and I think most of us agreed. One happens to be a mathematician, and she feels that spellcasters are at a distinct statistical disadvantage using the mechanics presented.

    Exploration was good, but it didn't feel particularly distinct from the way we currently play. This may be a result of my DMing style, were I encourage creativity. Monte kept trying to reinforce that we could do anything and not worry about what our character sheets said, but ultimately what we did we didn't particularly do well. In the end, compared to my home game I felt folks were more shackled by their ability scores rather than being free do whatever they wanted.

    None of us were particularly satisfied, and I cannot imagine the game as presented would be especially fun for my group (though I am fully willing to acknowledge that has as much to do with my DMing and adventure design style as the system).

    In fairness, we did play the base version of the game (and an obviously very early draft, given the occasionally contradictory information on the character sheets). I imagine several things will get cleaned up and/or altered by the time the open play test starts. The base game seems very targeted towards a particular group, and it is my hope that the designers make good on their promise that D&Dn will let everyone play the edition they want to play (mine would be a 4e/3E hybrid). I feel the game has a long way to go to satisfy all (or nearly all) of D&D players. I do have confidence that the design team is interested in making the best game possible and listening to feedback, so I am definitely looking forward to the open play test.

  2. #2
    COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)

    Alzrius's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    eastern United States
    Posts
    9,347
    This is probably the most interesting feedback I've read so far about the DDXP playtests.

    Ultimately, it seems like a lot of 4E fans seem to enjoy the new system the least...though given the strong background Osgood has, and the diverse backgrounds of his group, that doesn't seem to be quite as much of a factor as I thought it would be. Still, I have to wonder if 5E is going to end up pleasing no-one if it goes in the direction of being a 3E/4E hybrid.

    Beyond that, man does reading the above make me wish I knew more about the mechanics (if only because I want to hear that summarizing comment)!

  3. #3

    Superhero (Lvl 15)



    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,747
    Interesting thoughts, Thanks!

    I think for certain things like healing they would be better off just developing separate standalone rules modules that groups can use instead of making some patchwork that no one will like.

    You want to go whole hog on 4e style surges, use this module. If you want old school lethality and make healing a matter of magic and bed rest, use this module.

    I can think of several ways I could make it work so I don't think its an impossible design challenge.

  4. #4

    Gallant (Lvl 3)



    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    44
    Why did you get bored of your Rogue character (without breaking the NDA)? Was it a lack of options or were there a lot of options given, but they weren't very diverse? Do you feel that the direction they took the Rogue class was a bad one, or was it just a case of the mechanics not being polished yet?

  5. #5

    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)



    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirot View Post
    Why did you get bored of your Rogue character (without breaking the NDA)? Was it a lack of options or were there a lot of options given, but they weren't very diverse? Do you feel that the direction they took the Rogue class was a bad one, or was it just a case of the mechanics not being polished yet?
    Both in combat and out of combat I felt like I was doing the same things over and over again. I tried to find creative ways to do it... but it was still the same thing again and again (until I said screw it and stole the big bad's weapon, and then went back to doing the same old same old). Moreover, I felt like all my options were a foregone conclusion. Some things seemed to have no chance at failure, other no chance at success; this skewed me to doing the same things over and over again. To me, the drama is in the middle ground.

    As far as the rogue goes... it felt like a 1E thief. One of the things I liked most about the 3E rogue was that I felt I wasn't shoehorned into a particular role (sneaky, larcenous trapfinder); to me 4E took that even further--despite the formality of "roles"--by opening it up so anyone could at least attempt to find or disarm a trap.

  6. #6

    Scout (Lvl 6)



    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NCC-1701
    Posts
    161
    Thanks muchly for the report. I have a question that hopefully isn't under the NDA - did you submit your concerns and how? Did you talk directly to Monte about the issues you saw? Fill out a form?

  7. #7
    This is both really interesting and rather disappointing to hear. Your group sounds like it has opinions on 3E and 4E that are not very different from my own, so it weakens my enthusiasm a little...

    I hope you had a chance to talk to Mr. Cook a bit about your feelings on the game after the session was over. I'm certain that kind of feedback would be really useful at this stage of the game's development.

  8. #8

    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)



    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    141
    We filled out forms (one page) that collected some simple background info and had us list 3 things we liked and 3 things we didn't like.

    We also had a discussion with our DM's, with the implicit understanding that they would be recapping their experiences.

  9. #9

    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)



    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by RedShirtNo5.1 View Post
    Thanks muchly for the report. I have a question that hopefully isn't under the NDA - did you submit your concerns and how? Did you talk directly to Monte about the issues you saw? Fill out a form?
    We got to chat with Monte for close to a half hour after we wrapped up. He asked out thoughts, answered some questions, and seemed very interested in our opnions. In short, a real class act.

    Beyond that everyone received a comment card that asked how long you had been playing, what your favorite editions was, and asked for the three things you liked best and least. wish there had been more space on the page and that I had more time to collect my thoughts, but I'm sure all of that will come with the open play test.

  10. #10

    Gallant (Lvl 3)



    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    44
    Thank you for the Rogue information. Hopefully your criticisms were heard and noted by the designers.

    Considering the numerous criticisms you had for D&Dn, what do you feel they did right? Even with your negative experience, is there a feeling of "almost there" where you can see this becoming an enjoyable system to play?

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Ddxp
    By kmdietri in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Friday, 13th January, 2012, 02:37 PM
  2. DDXP Summary, Anyone?
    By TikkchikFenTikktikk in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, 1st February, 2011, 03:41 AM
  3. What they should have done at DDXP
    By RigaMortus2 in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Saturday, 8th March, 2008, 10:50 PM
  4. My XP at DDXP
    By SCMrks in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: Thursday, 6th March, 2008, 03:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •