+ Log in or register to post
Results 31 to 40 of 99
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
I repeat my assertion from an earlier poll that they need to examine the campaigns by genres and power level material in 4th edition Fantasy Hero, clean it up and adapt it to D&D, and think about the implications of what that means for modular options.
You can't even begin to talk about what does and does not belong in "high level" play until you decide whether you are discussing epic fantasy, high fantasy, sword and sorcerery, low "gritty" fantasy" -- and not infrequently, how those intersect with the amount of horror, comedy, drama, etc. in the campaign. (The same is also true of low level play, but can often be fudged in a given ruleset in ways that simply aren't available once the power level rachets up.)
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
Anyone can pick common spells as they level up or create a character. Uncommon spells are usually available in a limited way (perhaps only if you succeed in a check). Rare spells can by default only be found in-game as scrolls or other rewards. The DM could instead start a superhero campaign with all spells common, while a gritty campaign might include no rare spells and uncommon spells only as rewards.
Of course, this would have to be balanced with non-spellcasting classes. That's the hard part.
Guide (Lvl 11)
Settings don't presume levels of grittiness. You can run a campaign set in modern Earth with any level of grittiness or heroism. The Hobbit, the Lord of the Rings, and the Silmarrillion all share a setting, but are all completely different in scope and tone. Some settings, like Eberron, embrace almost totally incompatible playstyles (such as pulp heroic action and noir gritty intrigue), and give reasonable support for both. The choice between them, thus, is a campaign level decision, not a setting level decision.
Of course, overall setting choices are always subordinate to campaign choices. People choose settings for their relevance to a desired campaign style, not the other way around. As such, settings are very often portrayed inconsistently across different campaigns. This is the same thing as how modern Earth is portrayed very differently across different movies, books, and TV shows.
I hope I'm not getting too caught up on the difference here...
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Germantown, MD
- Read 0 Reviews
ø Block davethegame
I took the poll results from last week and dropped them into Excel and sorted from highest to lowest. Some pretty interesting stuff (all usual poll caveats apply, of course.)
BELONG IN CORE
Critical Hits 4698
Saving Throws 3744
Non-Vancian Magic 2930
Ability for Characters to Create Magic Items 2828
Action Points 2781
Second Wind 2432
Exotic Weapons 2411
Healing Surges 2364
Vancian Magic 2283
Prestige Classes 2166
Critical Fumbles 2134
Paragon Paths 1823
Epic Destinies 1756
Morale Rules 1287
Weapon Speed Factors 1072
Weapons Versus Armor Table 900
BELONG IN SUPPLEMENTS
Ability for Characters to Create Magic Items 2061
Epic Destinies 1863
Morale Rules 1799
Critical Fumbles 1786
Prestige Classes 1695
Exotic Weapons 1678
Weapon Speed Factors 1653
Weapons Versus Armor Table 1618
Paragon Paths 1616
Action Points 1518
Vancian Magic 1295
Non-Vancian Magic 1271
Healing Surges 1066
Critical Hits 1061
Second Wind 1015
Saving Throws 698
The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Lake Geneva, WI 53147
- Read 0 Reviews
ø Block Mark CMG
Campaigns are a series of actions or events. Settings are more than just place, they are also a matter of time and circumstance. Does that clarify things?
Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)
So, just so I can record my votes here:
It is difficult to play (as a PC) at high level
3: depends on the game and other gamers.
It is difficult to run games (as a DM) at high level
5: only if you don't know what you're doing(ie: poor planning) or poor players.
High level games require special considerations to run well (as a DM)
1: of course they do.
High level games require special considerations to play well (as a PC)
2: less than as DM though.
High level is just low level with bigger numbers
5: absolutely not.
High level play should be no different from low level in feel
3: if the "feel" is "fun", then yes, otherwise, it should certainly be different, but then that also depends on the scale of the campaign.
High level play should be no different from low level in gameplay
3: Again this is kinda dependent upon the campaign, but I feel that it should be, based on how I run my games.
I dislike high level play
5: I dislike bad games, doesn't matter what level. Level has, in my experience, had almost no bearing on quality of play except when other players or the DM purposefully threw their hands up in the air and made no effort to make the game enjoyable.
I dislike low level play
3: I dislike certain types of low-level play. I dislike low-level play that lacks progression(story, level, whatever). I dislike repetition. I dislike grinding kobolds. I dislike mundanity.
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
Do I remember wrong or was the original phrasing "I want to see in core" and "I want to see as an option"? Seems they changed "core" => in core set and "option" => in supplements, so does that mean no modularity in the core set?
Spellbinder (Lvl 16)
Personally, I loved high level play in third edition, but I tend to play spellcasters. I have no problems with the effects being thrown around, save or die effects, or any of what was there.
But, I recognize that we had to do a lot of outside the box thinking and work to make sure that the non-spellcasters were able to participate in the world altering activities of the casters. Some of that was handled with equipment, some with politics, fame, and other out of combat activities. Most of it involved the spellcasters using resources to make the non-spellcasters more effective. Either through buff spells or through crafting magic items.
We were able to make it work and all have fun, but there's no denying that it involved a lot of system mastery and a flexible DM. Of course, that aspect was also fun. I like that style of gaming.
I certainly support making it easier. In particular, making non-spell casters have a natural role in high level play is important. And not just in combat. I just don't want the playing field leveled by nerfing casters. I want all the crazy stuff and complex strategy, but with everyone involved and not slowed down by the mechanics.
Hydra (Lvl 25)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Read 1 Reviews
ø Block I'm A Banana
Here's what I think Monte is kind of approaching:
The tiers are playstyles.
Someone who likes playing a more gritty, "we are commoners with weapons who fear orcs" vibe kind of game shouldn't necessarily LIKE playing 25th level D&D, due to the changes that happen to your character. Someone who likes playing "big fat heroes save the world" shouldn't necessarily LIKE playing 1st level D&D, with your fear of kobold crits. Someone who likes playing "we're compentent adventurers" shouldn't necessarily like either of those extremes.
D&D can cover all these playstyles (and more), and changing between them. It's important that the DM and the players all understand that the change happens, and how to prevent it if they don't want it.
Last edited by I'm A Banana; Tuesday, 21st February, 2012 at 01:01 AM.[RIGHT]Jacob J. Driscoll
[B][I]Astral Plane Campaign[/I][/B]: Take [URL="http://www.dmsguild.com/product/193314/Hereos-of-the-Eternal-Classes-of-the-Astral-Plane"]your heroes[/URL] and [URL="http://www.dmsguild.com/product/190331/People-of-the-Eternal-Races-of-the-Astral-Plane"]your people[/URL] and come to [URL="http://www.dmsguild.com/product/198238/The-Athar-Citadel"][B]The Athar Citadel[/B][/URL], where those who reject the gods learn to wield divine magic!
Spellbinder (Lvl 16)
D&D has to cover all kinds of styles to attract the variety of players that it needs, and spreading them out over 20 levels is one way of doing that within one book of rules.
By Filcher in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: Tuesday, 5th August, 2008, 05:31 PM
By Shane_Leahy in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: Wednesday, 21st June, 2006, 10:10 PM
By andargor in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 76Last Post: Friday, 6th August, 2004, 03:58 AM
By Fimmtiu in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 54Last Post: Monday, 26th May, 2003, 03:08 AM
By rounser in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: Thursday, 30th May, 2002, 09:10 PM