+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: Clash of the Titans
Saturday, 3rd March, 2012, 08:44 PM #1
Clash of the Titans
Scanning around the tube (can we still call 'em "tubes" eventhough they no longer have tubes?), I've come across the remake of Clash of the Titans.
What did you guys think of this film?
As a whole, I liked it OK, but some things in it did some real damage, imo. The Giant Scorpions were pretty cool, but the followed that up with the dumb looking Star Wars rejects in the desert:
Blue eyes that light up like Christmas Lights. They look like what would happen if a Tusken Raider and a Jawa mated.
Medusa is OK, if a bit too "CGI Computer Game Looking", but don't forget the stupid witches who held that silly eyeball in their hands.
Yeah, I'll go watch the upcoming sequel this summer, but I sure hope they cut out the cheese this time.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on adverts that
- are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 03:24 AM #2
The original Clash was an orgasmic romp that defined fantasy cinema
the sequeal was cool giant scorpions
Originally Posted by IcyCoolSpoiler:
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 03:41 AM #3
Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)
The remake is utter crap, compared to the original. Going to it in 3D was one of the worst mistakes I've made in a good long time.
On it's own, its okay, though the witch part was really bad.
However, all said, I'm probably going to see Wrath of the Titans. At least it should have an original storyline.
"If it has stats, we can kill it." - T.G. Jackson, intro to 3rd ed Hackmaster
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 04:07 AM #4
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
My problem with it was there wasn't much character development. In action movies there has to be a little, so there is tension when there is a fight, and you feel bad when a minor character gets killed off. Even villains, like in say, Die Hard
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 04:51 AM #5
While I can't say the new one was anything worth bragging about, in my estimation it was better than the original. I thought the original was crap.
C'mon, that hoaky owl?
The only thing it was good for was the sight gag in the remake.
When Mads Mikklesen's character takes one for them and says, "Tell them a man did this", then smiles as he turns to stone is probably the best piece of character development in the entire film.
The film, for me, was hit and miss. 3 out of five stars. Worth watching if you're in the mood for it (and not in the mood to be too critical).
But, yeah, I did like it much better than the original.
There haven't been a lot of good fantasy films made, like, ever. There are a few. Of course, Lord of the Rings comes to mind. But, there's not a lot of D&D-ish, Swords & Sorcery or Greek mythological films made.
What other fantasy films do you like.
The first, Arnie, Conan film was decent. I liked the recent remake, too, but, like Clash of the Titans, it's really just a step above utter crap. I certainly see why many people trash it.
What else has been made--fantasy films that you liked?
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 06:48 AM #6
Okay when the movie came out I was 9 but I have watched it since and imho it remains a classic of 1981 that managed to have better monsters and a more coherent and intricate story than the remake. Moreover the characters had personality and plausible motivations. Calibos was a tortured soul, the stygian witches had purpose and the snake-tailed Medusa remains the most outstanding reimagining of a classic monster.
Bubo, the hoakey owl was comic relief and a R2D2 hommage, and is thus forgivable whereas the cgi rendered flop of 2010 is not (I still have no idea why those wooden sandmen were even in the movie)
Last edited by Tonguez; Sunday, 4th March, 2012 at 07:55 AM.
Originally Posted by IcyCoolSpoiler:
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 07:27 AM #7
Googled up a review I read awhile back that summed it up pretty well:
Originally Posted by The Alexandrian
You can also add "Perseus' entire family" to the list of people Zeus notably didn't revive at the end of the movie.
The original isn't exactly a classic of cinema, either. But it at least succeeded in being coherent.
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 09:27 AM #8
The newer movie was awful in basically every way. Though in particular what bugged me was the silly "I hate gods!" attitude. The writers of this script couldn't figure out what they wanted to do with this movie, so they start injecting modern American atheistic/anti-authoritarianism into a character who is special precisely because of his divine heritage.
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 12:50 PM #9
Orcus on an Off-Day (Lvl 22)
The remake was dissapointing. I never felt any reason to sympathize with any of the characters and the film seemed to jump from CGI encounter to encounter without much story element.
Death is for amateurs -Charlie Sheen
Sunday, 4th March, 2012, 02:35 PM #10
Magsman (Lvl 14)
Sam Worthington couldn't act his way out of a paper bag... virtual or not.
I enjoyed the Stygian witches in the first movie far more that then remake but both pale in comparison to the Gray Sisters upon which they were based:
Graeae : "THE GRAIAI (or Graeae) were two, or some say three, ancient sea-daimones (spirits) who personified the white foam of the sea. They were grey from birth, and shared among themselves a single detatchable eye and tooth. Perseus stole these and compelled the sisters to reveal the hidden location of their sister Gorgones. Three of their names suggest rather dire monsters--Deino "the terrible." Enyo "the warlike" and Persis "the destoyer." Another name, Pemphredo, "she who guides the way," simply refers to their role in the Perseus story."