Do you enjoy The Lord of the Rings? - Page 4




What's on your mind?

View Poll Results: Do you like The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien?

Voters
67. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes.

    56 83.58%
  • No.

    2 2.99%
  • Both.

    9 13.43%
  • Neither.

    0 0%
+ Log in or register to post
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48
  1. #31
    Registered User
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)

    Mark CMG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI 53147
    Posts
    8,755
    GM's DayCMG

    ° Ignore Mark CMG
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by Umbran View Post
    Well, here's something that might help consideration.

    I like the series. My wife tried to read them, but found they were just too slow for her...

    ...until we tried the trick of having me read them aloud to her, while she was crafting or the like. The effect is completely different, and she went from finding them too slow to be palatable to finding them fairly enjoyable.

    There is a cadence to the writing that lends itself to the oral storytelling tradition, it would seem.
    Fighting Fire - Ernie Gygax Relief Fund

    Please, help boost the signal!

    http://tinyurl.com/gygaxrelief

    As always,
    Mark CMG
    CreativeMountainGames.com

 

  • #32
    I like LotR, though I always skip the Tom Bombadil chapter, and I don't think I've ever completely read any of the poems or songs.

    I love The Hobbit, though.
    "The Soul of D&D? It's rolling a natural 20 when you're down to 3 hit points and the cleric's on the floor and you're staring that sunnavabitch bugbear right in his bloodshot eye and holding the line just long enough to let the wizard unleash a fireball at the guards who are on their way, because they're all that stands between you, the Foozle and Glory." - WizarDru

  • #33
    Registered User
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)



    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Charlottetown, PE, Canada
    Posts
    1,547

    ° Ignore Cor Azer
    Quote Originally Posted by Umbran View Post
    Well, here's something that might help consideration.

    I like the series. My wife tried to read them, but found they were just too slow for her...

    ...until we tried the trick of having me read them aloud to her, while she was crafting or the like. The effect is completely different, and she went from finding them too slow to be palatable to finding them fairly enjoyable.
    Huh... that's interesting.

    I wonder if it would work reading it aloud to oneself?

  • #34
    Registered User
    Greater Elemental (Lvl 23)

    Dannyalcatraz's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Planet Alcatraz & D/FW
    Posts
    30,177

    ° Ignore Dannyalcatraz
    My communities:

    I wonder if we an get Samuel L. Jackson to make an audiobook of it.
    IAAL...and an MBA. No, really!
    Metal School Founder; Campaign Ideas; my 3.X Databases: The Monk, The Martial Arcanist, Aquatic Ideas, The Psychonomicon

  • #35
    Registered User
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)

    Mark CMG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI 53147
    Posts
    8,755
    GM's DayCMG

    ° Ignore Mark CMG
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by Cor Azer View Post
    Huh... that's interesting.

    I wonder if it would work reading it aloud to oneself?

    One of the voices in my head is my own.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dannyalcatraz View Post
    I wonder if we an get Samuel L. Jackson (. . .)

    And that's another one.
    Fighting Fire - Ernie Gygax Relief Fund

    Please, help boost the signal!

    http://tinyurl.com/gygaxrelief

    As always,
    Mark CMG
    CreativeMountainGames.com

  • #36
    blank COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Spellbinder (Lvl 16)

    IronWolf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    6,849

    ° Ignore IronWolf
    My communities:

    I definitely enjoy LotR. I find them a good read and re-read them every so often. I do admit to skipping over most of the songs, but I do that with nearly any book that includes songs. A quick skim to get the general idea, but that's it.

  • #37
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Hobo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Michigan S. S. R.
    Posts
    19,124
    Blog Entries
    20

    ° Ignore Hobo
    Love it. Great writing. In fact, Tolkien does all kinds of clever things with the writing that many of his critics are simply completely unaware of. I'm constantly astonished by how nuanced his writing is.

    I've read it over a dozen times, and whenever anyone asks me what my favorite book is, I always say Lord of the Rings (and after the blockbuster movies, everybody now knows what I'm talking about.)

    I certainly don't think you'll find that love of Tolkien is universal in gamer-dom. I hear complaints about Tolkien frequently in gaming discussions. And apparently Gary Gygax himself wasn't all that big a fan. And even I don't really care for all the poetry.

    "I realize that I am generalizing here, but, as is often the case when I generalize, I don't care." Dave Barry

  • #38
    Registered User
    Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)

    messy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    342

    ° Ignore messy
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobo View Post
    Tolkien does all kinds of clever things with the writing that many of his critics are simply completely unaware of.
    example?
    I'm a lawful neutral human monk/druid level 2/1, strength 15, dexterity 13, constitution 14, intelligence 12, wisdom 13, charisma 11. Awesome.
    I'm a Power Gamer (Power Gamer 100%, Tactician 92%, Storyteller 83%, Butt-Kicker 83%, Method Actor 50%, Specialist 42%, Casual Gamer 0%). And proud of it.
    I'm a (bad) dm.
    Thanks, Gary.

  • #39
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)

    fanboy2000's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    1,514
    Blog Entries
    1

    ° Ignore fanboy2000
    My own experience with LotR is more complex. I got into D&D in the mid-90s when I was in the Navy and wanted to read LotR because I was given to believe that it's contents reflected the background info in AD&D books. I started with The Hobbit, and I enjoyed it. When I got to Fellowship, however, I found that I didn't like it. I stopped a little more than half way through Fellowship. Mostly, I didn't like the pacing. But I also felt like I was reading a scholarly work where I didn't know all the terms of art and was missing half the information I needed to enjoy it.

    My experience with LotR kept me from reading more fantasy. I figured that since most fantasy was inspired by LotR, then I probably wouldn't like it. (I did read Liber's stories though) Recently, I started reading Howard's Conan stories (which, I recently learned, pre-date the Hobbit) and really enjoyed them. I remember working at a game store and a customer saying that Tolkin was the greatest fantasy writer ever I said I didn't think so. He asked me to name someone better. Since I didn't read a lot of fantasy though, I said I didn't have a better one in mind. But that's been pretty much my attitude, I can't really criticize someone's writing if I don't enjoy the genere they're writing in. Now that I've read more, I feel like I can revisit the books.

    I actually haven't encountered a lot of strong criticism of LotR. I've seen gamers who acknowledge there are aspects of it they don't like, but few people actively dislike it. Mind you, I've seen non-gamers who don't like Tolkin at all.

    Quote Originally Posted by Umbran View Post
    My understanding is more that our thoughts and preferences on pacing have changed since Tolkien's day.
    It's been awhile since I've last checked the books out, but I think you're wrong. For example, The Thirty-Nine Steps by John Buchan is very fast paced. It was published in the UK in 1915, several decades before LotR.

    Of course, The Thirty-Nine Steps isn't fantasy, but there's a difference between LotR and other fantasy stories is that a lot fantasy was published in pulp magazines first. This means that the dominate form was short stories or serialized novels or novellas. A novel meant to be serialized in a magazine is going to have different pacing than a novel meant to be published at once, but spread out in three novel-sized books. So, while I can claim out that Howard's Conan stories are better paced than LotR, we run into the problem that Howard was writing for a different outlet.

    Certainly, most of the stuff I've read that was published before LotR or around the same time is paced, IMO, better. Certainly pulp novels like A Princess of Mars are paced very differently from LotR
    "This must be some new use of the word 'safe' I was previously unaware of."

  • #40
    Registered User
    Defender (Lvl 8)

    Mercutio01's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ocean City, NJ
    Posts
    989
    Blog Entries
    1

    ° Ignore Mercutio01
    Quote Originally Posted by fanboy2000 View Post
    It's been awhile since I've last checked the books out, but I think you're wrong. For example, The Thirty-Nine Steps by John Buchan is very fast paced. It was published in the UK in 1915, several decades before LotR.

    Of course, The Thirty-Nine Steps isn't fantasy, but there's a difference between LotR and other fantasy stories is that a lot fantasy was published in pulp magazines first. This means that the dominate form was short stories or serialized novels or novellas. A novel meant to be serialized in a magazine is going to have different pacing than a novel meant to be published at once, but spread out in three novel-sized books. So, while I can claim out that Howard's Conan stories are better paced than LotR, we run into the problem that Howard was writing for a different outlet.

    Certainly, most of the stuff I've read that was published before LotR or around the same time is paced, IMO, better. Certainly pulp novels like A Princess of Mars are paced very differently from LotR
    Look to the literature of the time that gets taught today as "good" literature. Writers like Faulkner, Joyce, and Wolfe. The pacing of those "literary" novels is more in line with Tolkien than the pulps were, for sure. Consider the narrative structure of the novels written before and in the early Modernist period and compare them to the works during middle Modernism and post-modernism. Look at Dickens and Tolstoy and then contrast them with Nabokov and William Burroughs.

    On another note, since LotR is "epic" in the literary sense, look back to other epics like Beowulf and The Odyssey and more modern works like Les Miserables and War and Peace. LotR definitely falls in with them in length, pacing, scope of story, and even, to some extent, style of composition. Beowulf, in particular, is hardly the quickly-paced romp of a pulp novel, and I find that even many English professors have skipped through the "boring" bits.

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. New Lord of the Rings RPG!
      By Aus_Snow in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 38
      Last Post: Saturday, 23rd January, 2010, 12:14 AM
    2. Lord of the Rings RPG
      By r05c03 in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Monday, 20th January, 2003, 10:09 PM
    3. [ot] Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Rings extended edition
      By Zaruthustran in forum Miscellaneous Geek Talk & Media Lounge
      Replies: 25
      Last Post: Saturday, 16th November, 2002, 06:08 PM
    4. [ot] Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Rings extended edition
      By Zaruthustran in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Wednesday, 6th November, 2002, 07:15 PM
    5. [OT] Lord of the Rings DVD
      By Maraxle in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Saturday, 10th August, 2002, 07:03 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •