+ Log in or register to post
Results 51 to 60 of 511
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:21 PM #51
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
Agree with Kamikaze above, both posts. Can't XP him at the moment.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:23 PM #52
Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)
Well, I'm saddened to see such a talented man leave the development team but I won't let this color my opinion of 5e. I'll let the material stand on it's own merits. And besides Monte is a fine developer, he'll do just fine with his own material as he has for years. Perhaps we'll see a new version of Arcana Evolved!
D&D Home Page - What Class Are You? - Build A Character - D&D Compendium
Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:28 PM #53
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
This is definitely disconcerting. For design and endorsement purposes, Monte Cook's name would have gone a long way to help bridge the fragmentation between D&D 4e, 3.5 and Pathfinder.
Best of luck to Mr. Cook, and I hope that D&D Next can really provide a game that gives us all a top notch gaming experience.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:32 PM #54
Guide (Lvl 11)
The only source we have on this is Cook.
Who also happens to be the one person who always makes me react with "I think I'd like to hear someone else explain the same thing before I form an oppinion on it". All oppinions on his work aside, and without any implications to his character: The man just isn't good with putting his thoughts into words that deliver the message he has to say.
http://spriggans-den.com My site for the Ancient Lands setting and everything RPG related.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:40 PM #55
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
I'm not a very big fan of Cook┤s work to be honest. Then again I don┤t feel the need for a new edition anyways.
Fantasy art by my wife;
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:42 PM #56
Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)
I definitely don't want to start yelling the sky is falling, so I won't. And I, like the rest of us, have no idea what this will portend for 5e. But I can say that personally, my optimism in 5e has taken a definite drop.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:43 PM #57
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
My first thought was "there goes the edition," which I quickly dismissed. My second thought which has been mentioned is that there will be no open playtest. WotC promised it with 4e and never followed through and there has been little talk of it outside of conventions. We'll have to wait and see I guess. I wish Monte the best regardless.
"What doesn't kill you will probably turn you into a vampire, a werewolf, or a zombie." - Myself
"This is Sky Captain. I'm on my way." - Joe "Sky Captain" Sullivan
Currently reading Trailblazer.
Currently recommending Desolation: Post-Apocalyptic Fantasy Roleplaying, Hollow Earth Expedition and Pathfinder RPG
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:46 PM #58
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
And now it all becomes clear. The edition wars will mark this moment, and really, it was obvious.
Monte Cook had devised a Flumph-based core rules engine. Flumph class, Flumph race, Flumph sub-class, Flumph everything. But he wanted a piece of it. When WotC pointed out that his contract said it was now WotC's creation, well... I mean, he had only one choice to preserve his masterpiece. Now he will start Flumphaizo, using the OGL yet again against WotC and creating a third front in the edition wars and a rift that will never heal ever.
It was so obvious. It was in an old post I made a while back that I just finished editing. You know, for clarity.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:48 PM #59
Orcus on an Off-Day (Lvl 22)
Lots of speculation - but the cause could be almost anything. While we can postulate scenarios involving design priorities, licensing issues, and other things, it could simply be something like a contract renewal and Monte not being satisfied with its terms.
There are a thousand possible reasons, and Monte doesn't sound likely to share them. Obviously, that means we'll speculate and conjure different scenarios, and one if them might gain traction and become "accepted" but only Monte and WotC know what the issue really was.
Wednesday, 25th April, 2012, 10:50 PM #60
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
You need another source for this statement?Originally Posted by Monte
Or maybe this one?Originally Posted by Monte
You need to know if he's lying about this? Are you questioning whether he left on his own or was let go?Originally Posted by Monte
Because yes clarifying that his beefs werent with the other designers might be suspect. I can see that clearly.Originally Posted by Monte
He's NOT actually rooting for them. Can someone get a confirmation on this before we go to press?Originally Posted by Monte
So he might NOT have a non-disclosure agreement and is just refusing to drag his business into the street for even more speculation? THAT BASTARD.Originally Posted by Monte
UH-OH he's going to be working...ON SOMETHING ELSE NEXT! He wont announce it though because well he doesnt communicate well. Also we need a confirmation of this whole interesting announcement thing.Originally Posted by Monte
I'm thinking you're totally out to lunch on this one. Find another form of foreplay that doesn't involve 3 hours of explanation and a pocket calculator.
By Galeros in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & DiscussionReplies: 95Last Post: Wednesday, 2nd October, 2013, 09:48 PM
By Morrus in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & DiscussionReplies: 57Last Post: Wednesday, 2nd October, 2013, 04:59 PM
By Steel_Wind in forum NewsReplies: 510Last Post: Thursday, 9th August, 2012, 04:24 PM
By Alzrius in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: Saturday, 15th October, 2011, 01:38 AM
By Sonny in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: Tuesday, 20th September, 2011, 05:24 AM