+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 10 of 250
Thread: Time to bring back the prose?
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:06 PM #1
Magsman (Lvl 14)
Time to bring back the prose?
This is coming from my new AD&D kick. I'm loving the Gygaxian prose in the rulebooks and the adventures. I'm wondering if maybe part of the problem with the "sense of wonder" in 4E stems from the clinical, obviously rules-lawyer writing style. HOWEVER... as a trade off, the language is more precise, and there is far less head-scratching over what the text means. It's like a lawyer wrote it (for good or for ill).
So what would you prefer?
1) A more flowery, open-to interpretation writing style, even if it means more vagueness, less precision, and possibly contradictions.
2) A continuation of concise, concrete language using defined terms and keywords.
I'd definitely choose (1). I think 4E would not have rubbed as many people the wrong way if it didn't read somewhat like a frog dissection. Using prose to express the game rules instead of legalese using Official Terms would have removed a lot of the blatantly gamist feel (I didn't have a problem with that, but most people in my group did).
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:18 PM #2
Enchanter (Lvl 12)
Eschew obfuscation, espouse elucidation, and all that. Clear language takes pressure off DMs by reducing the need for judgment calls. It in no way handcuffs the DM, however. We should all know that by now, but it's a good idea to make sure that's clear in 5e.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:19 PM #3
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
Precise concrete language all the way. I don't need to buy a "sense of wonder". I can provide my own. What I can't (easily) provide on my own is high-quality game mechanics. I have no interest in buying something that fails to precisely and concisely describe the game mechanics.
Now, the tone could be less clinical, and still be precise and non-contradictory, but the more goals placed on a piece of writing, the more likely it'll come up short on them.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:25 PM #4
Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)
For all I think 4E is a much better game, from my perspective it definitely suffers from the writing having all the charm of a computer instruction manual especially in the PHB. (Essentials is much fluff-heavier).
That's not to say you need to be flowery and unclear. Just more flavour made explicit than was in the 4e PHB.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:26 PM #5
In some areas, such as flavourful descriptions of objects, monsters and certain abilities: yes.
In the vast majority of areas, no, though as has already been said being overly clinical should be avoided as well. It can result in a somewhat sterile tone which is one of the more voiced complaints about 4th ed.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:28 PM #6
A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- N'amsha f'damsha
- Read 0 Reviews
ø Block steeldragons
1 please. I'll take the prose. One, cuz I like/enjoy it better, myself.
And B: Anything that can take the rules-lawyering and munchkin gaming down a few notches/out of the game, even if its something as subtle as the tone of the writing, is aces in my book.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:32 PM #7
Hydra (Lvl 25)
For me, I think that at this point if I can't sit down and read it, I'm unlikely to buy it. I only have four 4E books.
Reference books just can't excite me. Dictionaries, cookbooks, IKEA instructions all leave me cold. And if it doesn't excite me, it's not gonna get bought!
So yes, prose please.
That's largely what this thread, yesterday, turned into. So you might want to pop into that one for many extensive differing opinions on the subject.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:39 PM #8
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
Whereas in 4E, the DM's answer to such shenanigans is generally: "the rules very clearly state how it works; moving on".
To me, Option 2 makes for better roleplaying. When everyone has a clear picture of how the world works, they can roleplay within it more effectively. The more the world operates on DM whims and judgements, the more roleplaying becomes "try to figure out what your DM is thinking".
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:42 PM #9
The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)
And fixed the typos in the link.
Tuesday, 1st May, 2012, 04:43 PM #10
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
Mix of both?
I like it when I can sit down and read the books, but not being able to use them quickly and easily at the table is a real PAIN.
By shadow in forum D&D 5th Edition News, Rules, Homebrews, and House RulesReplies: 38Last Post: Monday, 24th December, 2012, 06:32 AM
By wlmartin in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 71Last Post: Monday, 1st August, 2011, 08:50 PM
By TylerDurden in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 58Last Post: Monday, 5th October, 2009, 06:39 AM
By Paraxis in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR GamingReplies: 16Last Post: Saturday, 24th June, 2006, 02:56 AM
By JeffB in forum Roleplaying Games General DiscussionReplies: 21Last Post: Wednesday, 30th July, 2003, 03:23 PM