What's on your mind?
+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 10 of 226
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 10:07 AM #1
Cutpurse (Lvl 5)
Save or suck Medusa petrification
Did anyone else happen to notice the Medusa's save or suck pertrification?
It's either make a save or avoid the gaze and have disadvantage to your attacks against it with it getting advantage to attacking you(though, the text seems a little confusing), unless you're surprised, in which case, you're rolling for a save.
Save or suck ruined more than a few games for me in the past. Having this stupidity brought back is not a good thing. In fact, it irritates me more than vancian being brought back.
Last edited by Mircoles; Friday, 25th May, 2012 at 10:17 AM.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 10:37 AM #2
Cutpurse (Lvl 5)
But here it is basically disadvantage all the time, unless you want to gamble.
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 10:39 AM #3
Gallant (Lvl 3)
I love it. I especially like the fact that in general the chance of turning to stone is in the players hands...suprise excepted
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 10:58 AM #4
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
I don't like save or die situation. It can be a serious fun-breaker.
Read the Sean K. Reynolds article about that topic.
Subsitute immune with +10 bonus
Last edited by Brix; Friday, 25th May, 2012 at 11:06 AM.
Hail the Heroes!!!
- your point of light -
Here you will find:
- central message boards for all 3.x fans.
- a petition asking publishers to continue to print 3.x compatible materials.
- A list of all publishers who will continue to print 3.x compatible materials.
- and more stuff in the future
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 11:26 AM #5
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
Not surprised they went this way but I think it is deeply retrograde step which trades the suspense of turning to stone or two rounds or so (where something can be done) for the old style D&D feel.
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 11:26 AM #6
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
I suspect both the creature and the mechanic are there as playtest bait.
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 11:59 AM #7
Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)
Here's the real test for the Medusa:
Take any person who hasn't played D&D yet is at least familiar with some Greek mythology (hell, Percy and the Lightning Theif counts). Tell them they are standing in front of a Medusa.
What do they do? They close or avert their eyes. Why do they do that? Otherwise they'll be turned to stone in an instant.
For the Medusa to be anything else is simply silly. What you might be looking for is a "creature that has snakes for hair with a gaze that slowly paralyzes and eventually turns you to stone". That's not Medusa though.
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 12:10 PM #8
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
Sounds fine to me. Shouldn't you be at a disadvantage if you aren't looking at something you want to hit? shouldn't it be at an advantage. It is a medusa. It is meant to be this bad. (Nice post above Traken).
Honestly all creatures should not be made to fit into some preconceived comfort zone. It should be "Holy crap, a medusa!"
Sorry, but I just don't get that style of play. I like dangerous creatures and this one sounds fine as written to me.
'Those nasty monsters have powers too...oh, that is so unfair, our characters should be the only ones with awesome powers'....b/c that so fits in with the fantasy/mythological literature I read....
Edit: Oh, and maybe we might just see some PCs that actually care about boosting defenses, saves, etc and not just raw attack/damage.
Homepage for all my roleplaying:http://connorscampaigns.wikidot.com/. Includes many GM Tools, Character Sheets, etc for DnD & Savage Worlds.
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 12:12 PM #9
Enchanter (Lvl 12)
Friday, 25th May, 2012, 12:19 PM #10
Guide (Lvl 11)
I find unrealistic that male PCs would be looking at her eyes anyway.