New RPG Company Casting All Women for Genesys

TanithT

First Post
You say you have felt sexism from playing RPGs, and I ask this question( because i need a better understanding of where it is coming from) was it the books, or game, or the people you played with?

It's a subtle gestalt, though some of the pieces of the gestalt aren't subtle at all. It's the overall gaming environment, which definitely does include how female characters are portrayed in the art and the storyline of the campaign. The attitude at the gaming table of the individual players and their expectations of women, both as character depictions in the game and as fellow gamers around the table. Their language when talking about women, again both inside and outside the game.

Different people are going to have different levels of tolerance for some of these things, and maybe even all of these things. But if the overall gestalt of the gaming environment adds up to consistently depicting, treating and talking about women in ways that many of them may consider disempowering or condescending, it's going to have an effect on the hobby.


If its the books, if when you open it up and the pictures are uncommfortably graphic, tell the DM/GM i dont feel comfortable playing this, IF he is a good friend, player, or GM he wont have an issue with finding a different game style.

I don't personally have a problem with explicit. I do have a problem with disempowered and inappropriately sexualized. Porn is cool, but if you take a picture that is supposed to depict fighting on the battlefield, or a representation of the clothes and gear an adventurer wears into the dungeon and make that into porn, you're no longer showing that character as an effective character. At least, not as an adventuring character. Also, you're showing that she's stupid. Because, fighting monsters with no pants on.


Sexism is out there, but it doesnt mean you have to be uncomfortable you have the power as a person to say I want nothing to do with this, and walk away from a particular RPG or situation.

Yes, I do. And I did. The price I have personally paid for this is to mostly not game. It's a high price, but the cost of being consistently disappointed and having more bad experiences than good ones has added up for me to be even higher. Your mileage may vary; this has been mine.


(about the art work...and I know I am stepping on egg shells) Women and men have differences in appearance. The males physical body is ugly, I've had this convo with a a man who is into men, other guys who are into women, and women into men. And every single one of them agreed that a women's body is more beautiful.

The modern media bombards us constantly with how women = beautiful and male physicality isn't so much emphasized. If you were to take a wayback machine to one of many other societies - the Roman Empire comes to mind first - I guarantee that you'd be saying the exact same thing with the genders reversed.

I find nothing of merit in the female form to look at, personally. It's boring to me. No appeal, and weird shapes. Not my thing. It doesn't upset me, but it does absolutely nothing for me. Male beauty in all its forms, however....amazingly esthetic. I like. Not just as porn, but to look at in general, because it's easy on my eyes in a way the female form is definitely not.


Though i feel this is often (and sadly) missued, it is the main way that company's are able to describe these women(not justifying it or saying I am ok with it. Just that no one has found a better way.)

So they describe female characters as going adventuring with no pants on, or in a miniskirt and a bra? As the main way to communicate what? That these characters are stupid? That they don't get the same adventuring gear as the men? That they're so different from the men that they can't be adventurers? That they exist only to be cheesecake for the men to look at? Because those things are being communicated pretty effectively.


Complaining solves nothing, what solves problems are people putting there heads together and designing a new way. ... I love hearing issues and problems, and I am all for speaking out, but what I like to hear after a complaint is... "i was thinking and I believe this might make it better...."

Once again, it sounds an awful lot like you're saying that Rosa Parks, Susan B. Anthony and Gandhi solved nothing because they spoke out to tell people that there was a problem with the way things were.

Yes, constructive thoughts are good. I think I've offered some, and mostly they boil down to other gamers just being aware of how the environment of this hobby may feel to us. And listening to us when we say, "Hey, this thing makes me feel uncomfortable."

There is no all purpose final fix for the problem. There just isn't. There isn't one inside of our hobby and there definitely isn't one for mainstream society. The only thing I can really accomplish is to clearly communicate how it feels to be me, and to ask that other gamers simply be aware of how some things about the hobby can be perceived and felt by people who aren't heterosexual males. That's all.

It's not really a good thing that a nontrivial number of the convention going fannish/SCA/anime women I talk to literally will not set foot in the gaming area and say that they feel really uncomfortable around gaming and gamers. If pressed, some will say things like "creepy" and "it's a boy's club and I don't feel like I belong in there."

I don't know whether many of you were even aware of this or not. This is not just the casual social stereotype of "gamers = icky nerds" operating here, because I'm already talking to con-going female nerds, some of whom are (or were) gamers themselves.

Yes, there are certainly female gamers at conventions who are willing to step into the boy's club and play, because the game is just that cool. But if you spent some time canvassing them and asking them about their experiences, you might just hear a few things that would make your toes curl. Yes, we can ignore that stuff up to a point, but that doesn't mean it's fun to pay that price of admission. And past a certain point, you're going to lose the ones who say it's just not worth paying any more.


Change comes from more than just words or an idea, it comes from our actions and desires to make something better.

I think it comes first from people understanding why change is even needed.

I don't have any single solution to the issue. All I hope to accomplish is to give other gamers a perspective on what it feels like to be me, a female gamer. I don't claim that my experiences represent all women, because they don't. Humanity is pretty diverse, and people are not just alike. But it's one perspective from a point of view and a set of experiences that maybe you don't personally have, and it's a starting point.

If you find yourself trying to invalidate or silence someone else's personal experiences and feelings because they are not the same as yours, it might be time to ask yourself why that's necessary rather than just sharing your own experiences and opinions. And more importantly, what you may be contributing to the environment by doing this thing.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Consonant Dude

First Post
I think I see the disconnect.

Elf Witch and others haven't been saying (and they can correct me if I'm way off base here) "the art drove me away". They're saying "sexism in the hobby, of which art is but one example, makes me feel less wanted here". They're also citing skeevy male gamers, bad convention experiences, inappropriate descriptive terms of them, and so on.

Yeah, there's some ugly stuff. I personally avoid most conventions and find gamers through my own network of friends, relatives, coworkers, etc...


In the case of Genysys, it's not really the art; there isn't much to speak of yet. It's phrases like "There's nothing sexier than a hot gamer chick who knows how to throw it down and keep up with the boys". Ignoring the question of what is "keeping up with the boys", exactly, it carries an implication that it is difficult for a woman to to do so, that it is sexy when you find one that can, and that "keeping up with the boys" is a goal to be lauded. And that's problematic not just because of the words themselves, but because it is revealing of how some men see the women in our hobby. It's a display of an attitude which goes beyond that mere phrase - it says that it's a "boys'" game.

So, many years ago, I had the chance to meet a person with amazing skills and a passion for cooking. I learned a lot. And nowadays I make it a mission to really entertain my guests.

I couldn't tell you how many times women have said that there's "nothing sexier than a guy who can cook as well a woman" but it happened many times. I don't take it as an insult. I don't think I should. I take it to mean that in a culture where it seems cooking with care and love is mostly done by women, seeing men applying themselves and sharing that passion is cool.

If you're outside the norm, the demographic, you may stand out. Now, if people treat you like crap, or discourage you, or ostracize you they're being asses. But they may notice and let you know it's appealing and refreshing. I'm fine with that, personally :)
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
I couldn't tell you how many times women have said that there's "nothing sexier than a guy who can cook as well a woman" but it happened many times. I don't take it as an insult. I don't think I should.

So I'm not sure I understand this, or that I'm getting from it what you mean me to. More specifically, I don't think that's a valid analogy. Here's why:

The extrapolation (by reverting the words back to the subject at hand) is "nothing sexier than a woman who can game as well a man" I'm very uncomfortable with that. That implies to me that (a) men game better than women; (b) it is a man's game; and (c) those women who can game as well as a man should be characterized as "sexy".

I agree with none of those three things. I'd also submit that a women referring to a man's cooking in that matter is not the same thing, because men, traditionally, are not the targets of sexism. It's similar to how racism arguments need to account for the history and culture in which the targets of such comments find themselves and the way those comments echo across society.*

*That is far too poetic; I hope my meaning comes across. I struggled to describe my thoughts.
 
Last edited:

Stacie GmrGrl

Adventurer
Yeah, there's some ugly stuff. I personally avoid most conventions and find gamers through my own network of friends, relatives, coworkers, etc...

So, many years ago, I had the chance to meet a person with amazing skills and a passion for cooking. I learned a lot. And nowadays I make it a mission to really entertain my guests.

I couldn't tell you how many times women have said that there's "nothing sexier than a guy who can cook as well a woman" but it happened many times. I don't take it as an insult. I don't think I should. I take it to mean that in a culture where it seems cooking with care and love is mostly done by women, seeing men applying themselves and sharing that passion is cool.

If you're outside the norm, the demographic, you may stand out. Now, if people treat you like crap, or discourage you, or ostracize you they're being asses. But they may notice and let you know it's appealing and refreshing. I'm fine with that, personally :)

You seen like an okay guy, I would like to be a player in one of your games. :)

Above there was mention of male and female bodies... it's just a matter of preferences, with a influence of media bombardment, but I have seen people of both sexes with what could be considered good looking bodies, especially when I watched wrestling back in the days of when I had cable.

But a persons real beauty, to me, comes from the spark from within them. It's just what I feel. I have met women with rocking bodies who were just, can't say that word and they were ugly to me. Attitude and self love is beauty to me. But, on a purely physical level, I do find women more beautiful than men.
 
Last edited:

Stacie GmrGrl

Adventurer
So I'm not sure I understand this, or that I'm getting from it what you mean me to. More specifically, I don't think that's a valid analogy. Here's why:

The extrapolation (by reverting the words back to the subject at hand) is "nothing sexier than a woman who can game as well a man" I'm very uncomfortable with that. That implies to me that (a) men game better than women; (b) it is a man's game; and (c) those women who can game as well as a man should be characterized as "sexy".

I agree with none of those three things. I'd also submit that a women referring to a man's cooking in that matter is not the same thing, because men, traditionally, are not the targets of sexism. It's similar to how racism arguments need to account for the history and culture in which the targets of such comments find themselves and the way those comments echo across society.*

*That is far too poetic; I hope my meaning comes across. I struggled to describe my thoughts.

I think what's "sexy" to a person is as subjective and individual as, well, almost anything else to be honest, and that's how it should be. There is no overall standard of what is "sexy" and what is not, despite societies attempts to convince us otherwise.

Maybe to some men any female gamer is sexy, simply because she is actually a gamer and is willing to talk gamer and throw dice and willing to play make believe with him... who knows. To some women, a man who can cook is sexy, simple as that. To some, the female form is boring, to others the make form is ugly. That's just how it is.

And if something is sexy, doesn't always less to sexism... that's more a form of discrimination and just a lack of social graces, IMO. Can art be an influence, sure, to some... to others it's just a picture. That's how art is to me. Just a picture. I take no offense to art itself.

What I take offense to are the people who willingly treat others negatively because they are inconsiderate and too opinionated to learn how to be social around others, and decide to treat a certain kind of person with disrespect and they think they are right.

I don't have the same reaction to some art that others have for those similar reasons... I just like it to make sense within the context in which it's presented within the source material. To me, seeing a girl almost naked in the snow isn't so much sexist, to me... it's just dumb. But if another person says they feel it's sexist, than it is, and don't try to convince them otherwise.

More specifically at Dude's comment about the cooking, I think he was trying to just express something he was told by women, and it came across as harmless to me. I don't think he was implying what you might have implied from it.

Maybe he just finds female gamers who play pretend and throw dice sexy. Who knows.
 

Felon

First Post
It doesn't have to be everybody. If, say, your company puts out a press release and the overwhelming response is pretty negative, it's probably time to rethink the language you're using to sell the concept.

Depends on what you think a 'range' is. If the issue is women feeling discriminated against or discouraged because they perceive that the hobby positions them as cheesecake and devalues their character representation, and a huge percentage - so far, 100% of the women in this thread who don't work for the company in question - are saying this very clearly, I'm not sure this represents a 'range' even if there is some division in the group that isn't being targeted.
Well, all feedback should be considered. However, I don't like what happens with things like the new Tomb Raider game. It shows how people can overreact and cry "sexism" and "misogyny" when they really don't have more than snatches of detail to work from.
 

TanithT

First Post
Oops - accidental deletion by a mod who hit edit and not quote. Might as well delete it the rest of the way since what's left didn't make a ton of sense out of context. No biggie.
 
Last edited:

Stacie GmrGrl

Adventurer
Well, all feedback should be considered. However, I don't like what happens with things like the new Tomb Raider game. It shows how people can overreact and cry "sexism" and "misogyny" when they really don't have more than snatches of detail to work from.

What about the new Tomb Raider? Spill details if you can please.
 

Felon

First Post
I don't know. The storylines I write may include some extremely grimdark scenarios, not because I'm a for-real violent person or a serial killer, but because I enjoy the genre and some very compelling stories can be told in it. I have depicted some incredibly ugly behaviors and cultures in my campaign worlds, not because I am glorifying the ugly behavior, but because the tension and conflict it creates is a vivid backdrop for good storytelling. If given a choice between a sparkly unicorns and flowers setting, or even a peaceful, prosperous kingdom type setting, and a really horrific grimdark setting, I'll go with grimdark every time. There's just better stories to be told there. Or at least stories that personally challenge and interest me more as a writer, a GM and a player.

Do you think Stephen King is a horrible person? Or that Robert Bloch is a psycho killer? Naaah. Unlikely.
When discussing fantasy material, at some point there's an inclination to say something like "the important thing is to separate fantasy from reality". But people come to role-play specifically to escape from reality and blur that distinction. Certain types of behavior are okay because they're part of the grim, gritty, dark-agey feel. If a guy's playing some cutthroat killer, why would he mind his manners around anyone? While at that table, he's some Westeros pastiche that thinks a woman is a wench and only good for a couple of things.

That's a vehicle for desensitized behavior you don't get when reading a horror novel.

It's not that I expect anyone else to not share their completely different experience or perspective or opinion. I respect that - everyone is different, and everyone has the right to disagree with the conclusions you draw from your experiences. But there's a difference between disagreeing about facts and conclusions and telling someone they're simply wrong for feeling differently. Or that what they feel does not exist.

That actually registers as a pretty serious red flag to me, and one that says I don't have the right to say how something personally affects me. That's a problem, guys. Because the response isn't just a factual disagreement or a different perspective. Whether or not it is the intent to convey, the message I get goes something like this.

Stop complaining. You are just wrong about how you feel, and you should not feel this way. There is something wrong with you. You are oversensitive/foolish/prudish. The problem is you, not us. Nobody else has a problem. We like the way things are. We don't like you for expressing your personal discomfort with it.

I don't honestly expect anything to change. The script in this thread has run just the same as all the other scripts before, and I am not particularly hopeful or sanguine. It is what it is, and all I can do that actually solves the problem is to vote with my feet and leave other folks to do what seems good to them.
It's saddening that you feel that this thread has run in such an oppressive direction, because it seems dismissive of all of the fair and supportive comments that have been the constant. Who's telling you to stop expressing yourself, even implicitly? Who's denying you your feelings? Most of the posts I see have your back, and none of them are trying to shut down the discussion. If I'm wrong, show me. By all means, talk to us.
 
Last edited:

Felon

First Post
What about the new Tomb Raider? Spill details if you can please.
Let me see if I can show a couple of trailers from two different upcoming video games. They have been decried using words like "sexist", "misogynistic", and "disempowering". I'm interested to hear if people here draw parallels and/or distinctions between them:

The first is from the upcoming Tomb Raider prequel.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol_-QGlwRqc]Tomb Raider - E3 2012 Exclusive Crossroads Trailer - YouTube[/ame]



The second is a trailer for Hitman: Absolutions.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXs5v-t9NwI]Hitman Absolution - Attack of the Saints Trailer [North America] - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top