What's on your mind?
+ Log in or register to post
Results 221 to 230 of 271
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 08:27 AM #221
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
The Hitman trailer is totally bizarre and uncomfortable. The PVC sex costumes would be weird and out-of-place in their own right, but then they're mixed in with the nun habits. And then to top things off, after the titillation, we get to see slow-mo shots of them being slaughtered. It's not just tasteless, it's downright yucky.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 02:04 PM #222
A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Read 0 Reviews
- Blog Entries
ø Ignore Kamikaze Midget
I don't think I can speak to what others might find sexist very much, but I can say that both of those have their problems.Originally Posted by Felon
The Tomb Raider trailer focuses a lot on beating up Lara Croft. I get that this is kind of where SquareEnix was going: gritty, survival-style stuff. But any trailer that is showing a continuous beat-down of a girl is going to flash all sorts of alarm bells. It squicks me out a little because it shows that SquareEnix is at least a little blinded by its privilege. They don't get to exist in a world where violence against women specifically isn't a real problem, so they need to be aware of that and pro-actively address that if the concept of the game is "Lara Croft, a young woman, gets her butt kicked for 30 hours or so."
If she's supposed to rise to heroism (and she certainly SHOULD, given that this is a prequel!), the trailer doesn't show a lot of that. Which, again, is probably part of the point (the rise to heroism is the part you play!), it just makes SE in sort of a catch-22. They're going to be accused of sexism and misogyny, but the burden is on them to make sure that their game ISN'T, even though the preview might suggest otherwise. When what you have on offer is "A girl gets beat up for two minutes," the burden is on you to show that you're not just doing it as a snuff film.
As for the Hitman trailer, I just don't know why they were dressed like dominatrixes under those habits. Or even why they're all women. But the same idea of privilege exists: they don't get to pretend they are in a world where violence against women is perfectly fine to glorfiy.
What these both hinge on is that in a world where women and men were completely equal in society, they'd probably be fine (if a little ridiculous in the Hitman case). But we don't live in that world, and to ignore the fact that we don't live in that world risks whitewashing actual problems that the world has. You don't get to pretend you can represent violence against women without a reaction, because your media exists in a cultural landscape that is greater than you, and that cultural landscape right now includes some very problematic gender-based violence.
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 03:53 PM #223
Magsman (Lvl 14)
The second video I found disgusting.
Favorite line heard at the table "I am killing to subdue" Kavo the Dwarf
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 08:06 PM #224
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
Except when it DOES get overtly sexual, the femaleness rather than the humanity of the protagonist is a hugely emphasized focus, and the camera lingers on those sequences and those body parts. Sexual violence is certainly gritty realism, but it can be problematic to center a game around or to have the camera dwell on lovingly and extensively. I just don't see any of that happening in this clip, however.It squicks me out a little because it shows that SquareEnix is at least a little blinded by its privilege. They don't get to exist in a world where violence against women specifically isn't a real problem, so they need to be aware of that and pro-actively address that if the concept of the game is "Lara Croft, a young woman, gets her butt kicked for 30 hours or so."
I don't personally agree with your statement about privilege here, because there is no way to tell a 'hard knocks' survival story without your protagonist taking a lot of them. An extension of what you are saying is that there shouldn't be female protagonists in this kind of story - women don't get to take punishment and survive and become heroes.
Possibly. I didn't see her as 'a girl', I saw her as 'the protagonist of a hard knocks survival story' and she's at the beginning of that story. She's first level right now. I assume she gets more powerful as the game progresses. I'm okay with her starting at first level.If she's supposed to rise to heroism (and she certainly SHOULD, given that this is a prequel!), the trailer doesn't show a lot of that. Which, again, is probably part of the point (the rise to heroism is the part you play!), it just makes SE in sort of a catch-22. They're going to be accused of sexism and misogyny, but the burden is on them to make sure that their game ISN'T, even though the preview might suggest otherwise. When what you have on offer is "A girl gets beat up for two minutes," the burden is on you to show that you're not just doing it as a snuff film.
Excellent point. How far do we have to go in actually *excluding* women from being the heroes in certain kinds of stories, though, if we can't depict them getting hit?You don't get to pretend you can represent violence against women without a reaction, because your media exists in a cultural landscape that is greater than you, and that cultural landscape right now includes some very problematic gender-based violence.
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 09:33 PM #225
Scout (Lvl 6)
We've been watching the video here a few times and everybody's saying it rocks! I'm being asked what kind of system we could use to play a Tomb Raider-style campaign.
I wanted to avoid posting anymore on the issue but this is extremely disappointing. More and more, this isn't even about sexism. Like, at all. It's about personal perception and preferences. And diatribes about how we live in an unfair world for women, so as a result, Lara Croft shouldn't take a beating like any worthy adventurer should!
I'm all for making sure we live in a better world. Improving laws, raising awareness in society, art, etc... those are separate issues and they are worthy causes.
I'm also all for appropriate games with appropriate art. Banishing exploitative and blatantly distasteful trends in style, art and editorial content of RPGs. Fighting against type. Offering more choice, empowering people.
But I'm seeing cases that are far from black and white being brought up as issues. And in the case of this Lara Croft trailer, something that boggles the mind. That's sexism? That's a social issue? That's a women issue?
NO. It isn't. It's about your personal preference. Don't like a resilient female protagonist facing adversity in an exciting adventure? Tough luck, move on! I'd run this kind of setting any day. My female players would love it. I refuse to even entertain the notion that we're part of some insidious trend to subjugate the female gender as a result.
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 09:53 PM #226
A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Read 0 Reviews
- Blog Entries
ø Ignore Kamikaze Midget
Sure. But the gender of the protagonist is a loaded choice. I mean, for Tomb Raider, to a certain degree, it's not (Lara Croft is the protagonist!), but for any media object, it always, to a certain degree, is. That's just sort of the reality of the world we live in. Not that it should be, or has to be, or ought to be, but that it is, and someone making a gritty survival story featuring a female protagonist needs to be aware that this is a different choice than making a gritty survival story featuring a male protagonist, and they need to be able to responsibly represent that.Originally Posted by TanithT
So the question is: "Why did you choose a female character to tell this story about someone going through this brutal physical punishment?"
I know that the reason probably has more to do with franchises and licensing than anything, but I also know that the target audience of the game is likely teenage to adult males, and that the franchise they're working with is steeped in cheap sexual appeals. Videogame characters in general aren't cast as weak and pained, but this Lara Croft certainly is, at least for a time. So why her? Why now? How many other similar videogame characters go through such finely-detailed, lovingly-crafted physical pain and suffering? I can't imagine we'd see Nathan Drake in a similar circumstance. Trying something new is great (I certainly applaud most of what they seem to be trying to do), but because this is not a neutral choice, they need to prove their good intentions. They need to show where they can that they are not choosing to put her through this brutal physical punishment BECAUSE she is female. That her femininity doesn't allow them to play with a male player's psychological fears and dreams and insecurities more.
The game might totally vindicate that perspective. Or it might not. But whether or not it does, SquareEnix needs to walk forward with an awareness that it is a tight rope to walk. People are going to ask: "Why did you choose a female character to tell this story about someone going through this brutal physical punishment?" People are going to ask: "Some of those scenes in the preview remind me of scenes from 'torture porn' films like Hostel. Why did the influence of the series change in tone here from an action-movie, Indiana-Jones feel?"
It's not that such protagonists shouldn't exist, it's that such protagonists automatically have a different audience reaction, and you can't avoid that, so you need to be aware of it. The reality of the world makes it so that you need to be more careful in doing a videogame about a tormented woman than you need to be when doing a videogame about a tormented man. You can do it. You just need to take extra care to do it well, because if you do it poorly, it's not just bad, it can be DEEPLY wrong.Originally Posted by TanithT
If one assumes the genders can be swapped without consequence, that's a symptom of privilege as I understand it, no? The choice of gender matters, right? So why did Lara Croft's story need this gritty, brutal chapter about her origin? Why did her Indiana-Jones Action-Adventure story need this hard-knocks origin? Why change the tone? Why does she need to be grittier and more realistic?Originally Posted by TannithT
It's entirely possible that it's fine and fun and it'll be harmless. But that trailer didn't reassure me. I don't look at a woman going through suffering for two minutes and say, "That's an experience I want in my living room!"
We can. We just have to realize that in the world as it exists now, hitting a woman is not the same thing as hitting a man.Originally Posted by TanithT
I mean, in the Hitman (ha!) trailer, there's a lot of women getting hit in all sorts of ways. But because the tone is more action-movie ridiculous, it carries less impact. Yeah, okay, take out those nun-assassin-prostitutes that tried to blow you up. Whatever?
In the Tomb Raider trailer, because it's closer to "realistic," and because her suffering is more a part of the experience, it's iffier. She's not a nun-assassin-prostitute trying to kill a guy. She's a very human woman in very lovingly-depicted pain. I have to ask, "What purpose does this serve?"
The game might have a good answer. It might not. But it's going to get the question.
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 10:28 PM #227
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
Absolutely I get that point. I also get that this is a bloody complex issue, and staying aware of the real life bad stuff that deeply shapes women's perceptions and preferences while not over-censoring and whitewashing everything is a delicate balance at best.I wanted to avoid posting anymore on the issue but this is extremely disappointing. More and more, this isn't even about sexism. Like, at all. It's about personal perception and preferences. And diatribes about how we live in an unfair world for women, so as a result, Lara Croft shouldn't take a beating like any worthy adventurer should!
Here's an analogy to think about. Drop gender and replace it with race. Can you tell a story that shows an African-American being enslaved and beaten, and that includes discriminatory language? Yes, you can. Roots was a huge success, and it told a powerful and compelling story about our American history. Which I sincerely hope that no one is proud of, or glorifies, or thinks would be a good idea to repeat. But that's not what Roots did. It did a very good job of telling this story from the protagonist's point of view, humanizing the African-American slaves and telling their human stories.
What if that same work had subtly or not so subtly glorified or justified or focused more on just beating up black people, dehumanizing them, objectifying them, etc? What if instead of telling the human stories of the protagonists, it focused heavily on the acts themselves, seemingly for their own sake? Maybe not such a good story to tell to folks who actually lived that history.
We saw the protagonists of that story being beaten and referred to with derogatory language, and struggling with that adversity. What we did not see was a primary focus on those acts of violence or humiliation, to the detriment of the human story of how those men and women courageously stood up to them. So it worked. It was a good story, an inspiring story, a human story.
The story that got told in Roots was one of heroism and humanity under adversity, not of racial degradation and white on black violence. Even though those latter two elements were a crucial part of the story and were liberally depicted. There is a difference.
I think we can make a pretty solid comparison between stories that are ultimately about the humanity of the protagonist and their strength under adversity, and stories that are mainly about violence and degradation and that lovingly focus on those sequences to the detriment of telling the protagonist's story.
It's not a black and white issue. I don't think anyone's ever said it was.But I'm seeing cases that are far from black and white being brought up as issues. And in the case of this Lara Croft trailer, something that boggles the mind. That's sexism? That's a social issue? That's a women issue?
I see no sexism in this trailer, but I do see stuff that might be personally triggering to a woman who has been threatened with violence or who has been the target of violence. At that point we need to ask ourselves whether game manufacturers are responsible for this, or whether individual women who have reason to be sensitized are the ones responsible for not choosing to view things they know will be upsetting to them.
I don't think there's a single solve-all solution. I do think that clear labeling is a great start, and the video game industry generally does this. If we were talking about a minority of women here, it might be less of an issue, but the percentage of women who are survivors of violence, sexual and otherwise, is insanely, unacceptably high in our society.
Is this fair? No. Are the game manufacturers responsible for this? Also no. And personally I'd tend to err on the side of more freedom and less censorship, as long as everything is clearly labeled enough to let people choose what they do and do not wish to view. But, and this is a pretty big but, the social condition does exist and it is huge. Being *aware* of it rather than ignoring it entirely is a really good idea, even if you choose to make products that are targeted to a different demographic.
Some of it has got to be audience, and context. If I'm visiting a household of Holocaust survivors and their immediate family, do I really want to show "Ilsa, She-Wolf Of The S.S." as our evening's entertainment? Er, probably not. Is it okay for the movie to exist so other people can watch it if they want to? Sure. I'm not going to suggest censoring it, even if I'm not going to show it to Holocaust survivors.
The question gets a little trickier if we're talking about something mass marketed to the general public. Is it a numbers game? Because half the population is female, and a very high percentage of that percentage are survivors of male on female violence, and their fundamental perceptions and experiences have been shaped by the very real fear of that violence, or the actual personal impact of that violence. And that's a real social problem.
What you're doing by putting a male on female violent game out is still not the same as sticking a Nazi movie in front of a Jewish family who lost loved ones to that regime, because it's a matter of choice. No one has to buy the game if they don't want to, and censorship sucks. It is a heavy price to pay.
But freedom has a price to pay also. What the game manufacturer may be doing is contributing just a little bit to the general culture of depicting violence against women, normalizing it, making it okay. Does that make it worth censoring? Is it worth setting women's issues above human freedom and choice and censorship issues? I have to say no, it's not, but on the other hand, I do want publishers to be aware that the social issue exists. And that it is very, very huge and personally impactful on not just some women, but very nearly all women. That is all.
Tuesday, 19th June, 2012, 10:48 PM #228
Waghalter (Lvl 7)
You make many very good points, but this is actually one I disagree with. I like telling human stories that aren't automatically gendered ones, and when a story can be told that matters and has the same heroic impact whether the protagonist is male or female, I tend to like it a lot better. Because it is the strength, nobility, heroism and humanity that matters in the plot, not whether the main character has an innie or an outie.If one assumes the genders can be swapped without consequence, that's a symptom of privilege as I understand it, no? The choice of gender matters, right?
Basically I like it when women are able to do the same things as men, and when gender matters less than ability and personal fortitude.
Learning to fight in the SCA and in the dojo was sometimes more difficult for me, because male opponents would refuse to hit me or refuse to hit me as hard as they should. It got to the point that I had to take the sifu aside and ask to please not be assigned any more sparring partners from the class, it was totally useless and I wasn't learning anything that way, would the teachers mind just using me as their practice dummy and not pulling their blows any more than was appropriate for a male student in a full contact sparring session.
The "oh, we just shouldn't hit women under any circumstances" attitude can be pretty limiting and damaging to women, IMO. I didn't pay that much for lessons so I could get less out of them than a male student. And it was annoying as ^%$$@ to sit out SCA fighter practices thanks to guys who refused to spar with me because they wouldn't hit a woman. Or guys who did a deliberately crappy job sparring with me while doing just fine with male partners.
As far as my own experience goes, that felt a lot more like discrimination than the guys who cheerfully waded in and hit me as hard as they were bloody well supposed to.
Correct, and that also has a negative, discriminatory impact on women who actually want to fight.We can. We just have to realize that in the world as it exists now, hitting a woman is not the same thing as hitting a man.
Annoyingly complicated issue, ain't it?
Last edited by TanithT; Tuesday, 19th June, 2012 at 10:59 PM.
Wednesday, 20th June, 2012, 02:07 AM #229
Novice (Lvl 1)
We want to thank everyone for his or her advice, criticism and input. Fable Streams is a young company and we are interested in getting everyone’s feedback so that we can learn and grow. One of the releases for our 1 of the 9 launch event noticeably has ruffled some feathers.
First, we would like to say that it is not our intent to make anyone feel uncomfortable and we take to heart the comments and impact our release has had for many of you. We would like to note that in our minds, the definition of “hot, gorgeous, chicks, ladies, etc.” is what each individual makes it mean. For us, a truly gorgeous individual is one who knows with absolutes what makes her the powerful and inspiring person that she is. We understand that our release may not have been effective in communicating this and in the future we will work to be more inclusive of all.
We have reached out to many female gamers in the industry to garner input and opinions on various aspects of our efforts. We would love to have more input from the women and the girls interested in creating a better female gaming experience and therefore, if you are interested please send us a message Contact | Fable Streams a message
We have many things that we are working on and your input is valued and appreciated.
This may be a great time to ask a question that has come up for us. In our interviews, we asked the question, “How do you prefer someone refer to you? As a women, girl, lady?” We have found that women do not want to be called girls, but girls do not want to be called women, some like to be called ladies and some think being called a lady is creepy, stuffy, odd, funny, sweet, etc. We would be interested to know how you each interpret being referred as a (girl, lady, woman); and does it depend on the gender of the individual that is saying it to you? We have discussions about it in the office all the time. We appreciate any input.
Second, we are honored that so many individuals have taken the time to do some research on the company. Since last year we have undergone many exciting and new changes. Currently, most information on our Fable Streams and Genesys sites is in the process of being redone. We will be re-launching our sites very soon, just in time for Gen Con and we look forward to everyone’s feedback on that as well.
Lastly, since we will be announcing our final selections this week we encourage everyone to check back and see who was chosen. In fact, let us know the individuals you think would be a good fit. Though we would never turn anyone away that is courageous enough to cast, we are looking for individuals that are game enthusiasts and embody the personality of the characters.
Wednesday, 20th June, 2012, 03:13 AM #230
Enchanter (Lvl 12)
I suppose, like many things, how much sexism exists in a given setting, how noticeable it is to different parties, really can change dramatically on the specific group dynamics.