D&D 4th Edition Rule-of-Three: 06/19/2012


What's on your mind?

+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Rule-of-Three: 06/19/2012

    You've got questionsÔ??we've got answers! Here's how it worksÔ??each week, our Community Manager will be scouring all available sources to find whatever questions you're asking. We'll pick three of them for R&D to answer.

    Read Rule-of-Three: 06/19/2012 on D&D Insider here!



  2. #2
    Registered User
    Lama (Lvl 13)



    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heidesheim
    Posts
    4,294
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ° Ignore UngeheuerLich
    I don┤t like answer 2.

    And I won┤t play that way. If kobolds are outnumbering you, but are fighting in light, the guardian ability should give those goblins disadvantage. They really should cancel each other out on a 1 by 1 basis... oh, and technically if they are cancelling each other out, you should not technically have it, but need to search for an additional advantage.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)



    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Port Moody, BC, Canada
    Posts
    954
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ° Ignore FitzTheRuke
    Quote Originally Posted by UngeheuerLich View Post
    I don┤t like answer 2.

    And I won┤t play that way. If kobolds are outnumbering you, but are fighting in light, the guardian ability should give those goblins disadvantage. They really should cancel each other out on a 1 by 1 basis... oh, and technically if they are cancelling each other out, you should not technically have it, but need to search for an additional advantage.
    That's how I thought it worked, and it seemed fine that way to me.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)



    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    2,533
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ° Ignore Minigiant
    1) Interesting.

    2) I don't like this rule. I played it that way. But I hated it.

    3) Facing? First module I ain't using probably just showed up.
    My beard is hairy.

  5. #5
    Yeah, did anyone really want facing? Serious question.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Lama (Lvl 13)



    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heidesheim
    Posts
    4,294
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ° Ignore UngeheuerLich
    I want facing! (Sometimes)

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)



    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Middlesbrough, UK
    Posts
    1,180
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ° Ignore jadrax
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by GX.Sigma View Post
    Yeah, did anyone really want facing? Serious question.
    I think I would rather have it than not, *if* it is simple. The no-facing thing always confuses the hell out of my players, I was seriously considering getting 'there is no facing' tattooed on my forehead.

  8. #8

    New Rule of Thirds

    I like that they really tried to make each domain cleric feel its domain. not just a standard chainmail with mace type. i see a valid stealth cleric here with light armor and a dagger.

    about 3. im not sure about facing rules. i thought it was understood that all creatures are constantly facing all directions.

    Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game Official Home Page - Article (Rule-of-Three: 06/19/2012)

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Herremann the Wise's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    2,286
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Blog Entries
    4

    ° Ignore Herremann the Wise
    My communities:

    I love the idea of facing for an advanced combat module. However, if you do this, I think you really need to split a character's actions up so that characters can have a number of reaction opportunities (call them minor and swift actions that combatants get one or more of). With this, you can change facing as part of a reaction. You then have the space in front of a character where they threaten, their flanks and their rear. So many opportunities here to get good tactical combat without having to artificially complicate it with thousands of powers.

    Best Regards
    Herremann the Wise
    Imagination is a quality given a man to compensate him for what he is not,
    and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is.

    Oscar Wilde

    He who is certain he knows the ending of things when he is only beginning them is either extremely wise or extremely foolish; no matter which is true, he is certainly an unhappy man, for he has put a knife in the heart of wonder.
    Tad Williams

  10. #10
    Registered User
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)



    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,012
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ° Ignore pemerton
    My communities:

    Between this, and the new Legends and Lore, it seems to be getting clearer that there won't be much support for 4e-style play.

    This was particularly striking from the L&L column:

    One of my favorite pieces of 4th Edition was its approach to the humanoid monsters. They felt distinct not only in terms of story and place in the world, but also in how they played during combat. Goblins skittered away from the characters, gnolls swarmed in hungry packs, and so forth.

    Rather than make special abilities a feature of every creature, we're instead moving those abilities to chieftains, shamans, and other leaders. . .

    When a creature's story and background demand it, we will also allow exceptions to how we assign special abilities. Even the weakest drow has an array of magical abilities. We won't remove abilities for the sake of hitting this goal [of scaling complexity and sending gameplay signals to players and GMs].

    This implies two things: (i) that "story and background" are based on a pre-4e standard, and (ii) that "story and background" are being treated as something indpenent of, and prior to mechanics, rather than something that it is the job of the mechanics to produce.

    So instead of hobgoblins who form phalanxes because they get an AC bonus (as in 4e), there will be flavour text telling us that hobgoblins form phalanxes, and that goblins are sneaky, even though mechanically there will be little reason for the hobgoblins not to sneak or for the goblins not to form phalanxes.

    The tactical combat model desctribed in Ro3 doesn't look to me much like 4e either:

    this chunk of optional rules covers tighter integration with a grid, templates for area effects, more grid-based rules for line of sight and cover, along with more options for movement and forced movement. . . . we want the tactical combat module to provide a full, rich tactical experience that is completely compatible with our base rules.

    Mearls adds:

    one of our goals is to create a general set of stunts that monsters can attempt . . . abilities such as stomp, fling, and bull rush might exist as maneuvers that any monster can attempt in the tactical combat module. . . The goal is that a group playing without miniatures or a grid can run a fight that captures the core of a monster. A group that loves tactical combat and detail can add that, with the DM now having more freedom and flexibility to throw unexpected tactics at the party.

    Particularly in light of what Mearls says about monster design, I don't have any hope that we'll see monsters like the Deathlock Wight (uses forced movement + psychic damage to model PCs fleeing from fear at its Horrific Visage) or PC powers like Come and Get It or even Thunderwave.

    Tactical combat resolution seems to be being treated as an end in itself, rather than (as in 4e) a vehicle for communicating and generating deeper thematic and story elements.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rule-of-Three: 06/12/2012
    By Wizards of the Coast in forum News
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Wednesday, 13th June, 2012, 03:30 PM
  2. Latest Rule of Three 05/29/2012
    By Zaphling in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Thursday, 31st May, 2012, 03:21 AM
  3. Rule of Three: May 29, 2012
    By Tallifer in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, 30th May, 2012, 12:51 AM
  4. [Rule of Three] 4/10/2012...
    By Ranganathan in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: Tuesday, 10th April, 2012, 07:52 PM
  5. Rule-lite or Rule-heavy describe THE perfect ideal ruleset
    By Turanil in forum General RPG Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: Wednesday, 13th July, 2005, 08:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •