Balesir
Adventurer
I don't think it's really about "priority" - perhaps my original thought (which I changed because I wasn't sure of cultural imputations) of a jacket instead of a shirt would have been better; I don't know. The point is, I think, that neckscarf, hat and gloves do make you warmer. Now, there is a point where you become too cold, so you want something to keep some heat in - just not too much. What I'm saying is it isn't unreasonable to ask why a person chooses scarf, hat and gloves over a jacket (or a shirt - or "pants", by which I assume you mean "trousers", since otherwise the reason would be obvious...)I've been squinting at this analogy for several minutes trying to determine exactly why it feels off. Now I know. A shirt may or may not make people feel warm (and it's not one of the first things you throw off to feel cooler). However, neckscarf, hat and gloves does objectively imply priority and effectiveness of retaining heat. Your analogy objectively ascribes qualities to the secondary articles of clothing and is therefore a biased and unhelpful analogy IMO and does not counter JamesonCourage's point (I wonder if it actually reinforces his point?)
Reasons like "I just like hats and gloves are reasonable; "I'm supposed to be the Lone Ranger, so I have to have the hat, kerchief and gloves" would be fine but would still beg the question over the shirt, but "the jacket isn't inherently tied into my body like hat and gloves are" is going to get some askance looks...
Which begs the question "what is it about flip-flops you dislike if sandals are fine?"Its more like I say I don't like flip flops and you say but dude your wearing sandals. What you fail to see is that while they share some common properties not all sandals are flip flops.