RPGs Gygax on Realism in Game Design




What's on your mind?

+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 12 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 116
  1. #1
    Member
    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)



    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    12210
    Posts
    714

    ø Ignore GreyICE

    Gygax on Realism in Game Design

    Since we're going back to the beginning, I decided to unearth the beginning, and actually read some stuff in high Gygaxese. I'm beginning to think I might have liked Gary, tendency for long-winded, slightly pompous rants aside.
    Interestingly, most of the variant systems which purport to “improve” the game are presented under the banner of realism. I have personally come to suspect that this banner is the refuge of scoundrels; whether the last or first refuge is immaterial. “Realism” has become a bugaboo in the hobby, and all too many of the publishers — TSR included — make offerings to this god too frequently.

    ...

    When fantasy games are criticized for being “unrealistic” — and by fantasy I certainly mean both imaginary “science fiction” games and heroic fantasy — the sheer magnitude of the misconception absolutely astounds me! How can the critic presume that his or her imagined projection of a non existent world or conjectured future history is any more “real” than another’s? While science fantasy does have some facts and good theories to logically proceed from, so that a semblance of truth can be claimed for those works which attempt to ground themselves on the basis of reality for their future projections, the world of “never-was” has no such shelter. Therefore, the absurdity of a cry for “realism” in a pure fantasy game seems so evident that I am overwhelmed when such confronts me. Yet, there are those persistent few who keep demanding it. The “camel” of working magic, countless pantheons of gods and devils, monsters that turn people to stone or breath fire, and characters that are daily faced with Herculean challenges which they overcome by dint of swordplay and spell casting is gulped down without a qualm. It is the “gnat” of "unrealistic” combat, or “unrealistic” magic systems, or the particular abilities of a class of characters in the game which makes them gag.

    ...

    D&D is a make-believe game. It is designed, however, to facilitate close personal involvement in all aspects of play; this makes suspension of disbelief easier for those who can initially accept a game form which does not relate to any reality except a few tenuous areas... It is a game for the imaginative and fanciful, and perhaps for those who dream of adventure and derring-do in a world all too mundane. As a game must first and foremost be fun, it needs no claim to “realism” to justify its existence.

    (Bolding mine, a few italic tags missed due to age)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails garygygax_2.jpg  
    Last edited by Morrus; Thursday, 6th September, 2012 at 06:04 PM. Reason: News article promotion

 

  • #2
    Many who critised missing realism did not do so about the rules system but about the adventures preented (hello huge hydra in a smallish room with only normal doors).

  • #3
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)

    Chris_Nightwing's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Basel, Switzerland
    Posts
    1,457

    ø Ignore Chris_Nightwing
    Most of my problems with rules systems aren't about realism, if they do not intend to be set in the real world, but about logic, elegance and internal consistency.
    Everyone is weird, but those who are weird in the same way call themselves normal.

  • #4
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)

    JeffB's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,288

    ø Ignore JeffB
    Don't bring Gary into this. He was less than fond of 3e, and we can probably be safe in saying he would have been less kind about 4E. He would be laughing his ass off reading the threads in this forum.

    You need to quote Cook, Tweet,Heinsoo, Mearls, and others if you want to Edition War about how 5e is shaping up or should.

  • #5
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Bedrockgames's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,530

    ø Ignore Bedrockgames
    I wiuld just keep in mind that the discussion about reaism and gaminess were very different at the time he said that. People were making intricate and extraordinary attempts toward realism that you just dont really see today. I dont know that one can take a 30 year old quote from Gary and assume it sheds much light on what the man would have though about current discussions concerning things ike martial encounter powers or putting game play considerations ahead of setting considerations. I think he was really talking more against attempts to break combat into detailed and realistic mechanics.
    http://www.rpgnow.com/product/131611/Sertorius

  • #6
    Mod Squad
    Orcus on an Off-Day (Lvl 22)

    Umbran's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    27,510
    Blog Entries
    6

    ø Ignore Umbran
    We owe a lot to Gygax...

    But, If I were to judge that writing as I do others here and now, well, he didn't seem to have a lot of confidence in his own position. If you have to *start* the piece by calling people names (even highfalutin' names like "scoundrel") then perhaps your point isn't nearly as strong as you think it is...

  • #7
    Registered User
    Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)

    The Shadow's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Corvallis, Oregon, United States
    Posts
    973

    ø Ignore The Shadow
    Quote Originally Posted by Umbran View Post
    If you have to *start* the piece by calling people names (even highfalutin' names like "scoundrel") then perhaps your point isn't nearly as strong as you think it is...
    This, very much. And I would disagree about the 'mildly pompous', too. He is VERY pompous, as a rule.

    And considering the fact that he himself produced several rule-systems that got frequently house-ruled out because they were too cumbersome in attempting 'realism' (notably weapon speed factors), quite possibly he should be less ready to throw stones.
    "All right, I am not the Shadow. You have nothing at all to worry about. Except, oh, wait, I'm pointing a gun at you."

    --The Shadow

  • #8
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Animal's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Odessa
    Posts
    335

    ø Ignore Animal
    My communities:

    I think he just playfully paraphrased an old quote.. Don't remember the author, but it went like this: "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel".
    Made me chuckle actually.

  • #9
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Li Shenron's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Edition-shifting
    Posts
    10,689
    Forgotten RealmsPlanescapeRokuganD&D

    ø Ignore Li Shenron
    My communities:

    (...came to the thread because of the sound of a can opening...)

    I think the word "realism" is used by different people to mean different things:

    - consistency/reliability of the rules, meaning that if I can do X in situation Y, more or less I expect to be able X again if Y repeats at a later date; I don't think "realism" is exactly the same as "consistency" but sometimes the word is used for this

    - support of suspension of disbelief: yes, there can be hydras in a small room and it's up to you to figure out how it's possible... but if the DM exaggerates with the quantity (especially if then she repeatedly doesn't deliver an explanation at all) it may just be too absurd for many people to take

    - correspondence with real-life expectations: if you crit someone in the eye with a sword and he doesn't die... the problem is if you start feeling unable to make predictions on even basic phenomena, because most of the times predictions are the starting point of a tactical choice

    - differentiation of details: having 10 types of rapiers with slightly different rules can be a boon to someone's campaign and totally boring to someone else; you can't really criticise either way, it's just a matter of gaming style and preference

    I suppose Gygax had in mind certain gamers who can be obsessed with any of the above, which of course can become detrimental to everybody's fun at the table if they don't share the same preference. But I hardly believe he was against any level of realism... to me his early editions of D&D even had more realism than I can personally take, with all those rules subsystems and tables for everything!
    "There is no survival without order, there is no evolution without chaos."
    "You have to see past the RAW to understand the rules of the game."
    "And rules are OVERRATED by the way!

  • #10
    Registered User
    Lama (Lvl 13)

    Man in the Funny Hat's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Inland Empire
    Posts
    2,364

    ø Ignore Man in the Funny Hat
    My communities:

    Quote Originally Posted by The Shadow View Post
    This, very much. And I would disagree about the 'mildly pompous', too. He is VERY pompous, as a rule.
    And considering the fact that he himself produced several rule-systems that got frequently house-ruled out because they were too cumbersome in attempting 'realism' (notably weapon speed factors), quite possibly he should be less ready to throw stones.
    Note that some of those systems were included only at the urging of others and he himself did not use them. Not sure about WSF but initiative, morale and psionics leap to mind. And I'd be fairly certain that this was a point of view he wrote as much as 30 years ago. Pretty sure that if speaking on the same subjects again just before his death he'd have been a hell of a lot more temperate.
    No version of D&D has an Expiration Date.

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 1 of 12 1234567891011 ... LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Game Design 108: Realism vs. Fun
      By Challenger RPG in forum Press Releases & Announcements
      Replies: 16
      Last Post: Friday, 10th May, 2013, 09:30 PM
    2. Gygax on Realism in Game Design
      By GreyICE in forum News
      Replies: 114
      Last Post: Friday, 14th September, 2012, 12:09 AM
    3. Gary Gygax: The Father of Games Design
      By Deuce Traveler in forum General RPG Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Thursday, 2nd August, 2012, 03:53 AM
    4. Gary Gygax: The Father of Games Design
      By Morrus in forum News
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Friday, 27th July, 2012, 01:58 PM
    5. Realism vs. Believability and the Design of HPs, Powers and Other Things
      By Falling Icicle in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR Gaming
      Replies: 320
      Last Post: Monday, 14th May, 2012, 06:43 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •