Gamescience dice are very much worth it.

Wow, this thread is a real eye opener about how people view dice rolling in games. I would have thought people would prefer untumbled dice. Im... shocked. I own 3 sets and I love them, I know players that roll with dice that turn up 20 way too often to be coincidence, I make them use these and it gets rid of that problem very quickly. The ones I own are much more random than any other die sets I currently have. The only other better dice rolling would be a random number gen on a computer (yes I am aware it's not "random" as it is based off an internal oscilation device but it's random enough for a human not to know how to manipulate assuming you arent a coder)
Tumbled dice are also random enough for a human not to know how to manipulate, assuming you aren't Qui-Gon Jinn.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Aesthetically displeasing to you - I find them very beautiful. The sprue knub is easily taken off with a modelling knife and I have been inking my own dice since forever. Gamescience dice were the very first dice I ever bought and it took me years to find them again (this was long before any 'internet'). The randomness thing doesn't mean anything to me - I buy them because I love the look of them and the fact that they don't roll all over the table - a couple of bounces and they stop. Compared to some of my players and their 'forever roller' dice that..just...don't...STOP... I'm very happy with my GS dice and use them exclusively.

You may have noticed that I qualified the sentence citing aesthetics with "to me." I make no assumptions on other people's tastes. I just generally prefer the feel and appearance of natural materials over plastic.
 

Here's an interesting point - it may well be that GameScience dice are less apt to be biased. But, the fact that they don't roll far means they are much, much easier to cheat with, if someone's got that skill.
I have yet to find anyone who can actually demonstrate that skill even on video - though I have seen many people talk about how OTHERS can do it. I have no doubt that somewhere out there are people who really can but I suspect you can count them on the fingers of one hand. Thus, similar to the advantage granted by untumbled dice, I think it doesn't bear significant consideration. Willing to be proved wrong though...
 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator
Staff member
Supporter
I met a guy who worked in casino security who said that they had caught a guy who could skew results of dice throws in his decade of experience.

One guy in 10 years.

That can mean they are exceedingly rare, that they are hard to detect, or- as I suspect- a bit of both.
 
Last edited:

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
I met a guy who worked in casino security who said that they had caught a guy who could skew results of dice throws in his decade of experience.

One guy in 10 tears.

That can mean they are exceedingly rare, that they are hard to detect, or- as I suspect- a bit of both.

They are exceedingly rare in casinos, because casinos typically expect/require the thrower to bounce the dice off a barrier. It is incredibly difficult to skew the dice in that setup, yes. Competitive backgammon has players use a dice cup.

But, they use those methods because without them, controlling d6s isn't all that hard.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
Thus, similar to the advantage granted by untumbled dice, I think it doesn't bear significant consideration.

My point, in fact, is that the two are probably roughly similar risks to your game. If you're going to worry about one, you probably should worry about the other.

Personally, I don't actually think most folks need to worry about dice-manipulators in friendly RPG play. But, I don't think most folks need to worry about the bias of tumbled dice, either.
 


Evenglare

Adventurer
Tumbled dice are also random enough for a human not to know how to manipulate, assuming you aren't Qui-Gon Jinn.

I very very much disagree , I have run into MANY MANY dice that rolled certain numbers more often than others. GS die are much more random in my experience.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
I very very much disagree , I have run into MANY MANY dice that rolled certain numbers more often than others. GS die are much more random in my experience.

I don't doubt that you think the dice were biased, but, I'll repeat: humans are *very* susceptible to confirmation bias. The context of when we see a result matters in our perception of its weight.

If you haven't written results down and put them through a statistical measure, don't be too sure that the die is biased. I rolled a d10 FIFTY times, without a single 9 or 10, and that is not strong evidence that the die is biased against those numbers, statistically speaking.
 

I very very much disagree , I have run into MANY MANY dice that rolled certain numbers more often than others. GS die are much more random in my experience.
I have never run into any, and I've done seen an awful lot of dice rolling. Unless you've got solid statistics to back up that claim, I don't believe it.

I'm sure that you do; such is the nature of our experience and our perception of it. But I don't.
 

Remove ads

Top