Steely_Dan
First Post
In my experience (DMing it consistently for 2 years), 4th Ed (very fun) is more of a skirmish/board-game variant of D&D, not a proper edition/iteration.
In my experience (DMing it consistently for 2 years), 4th Ed (very fun) is more of a skirmish/board-game variant of D&D, not a proper edition/iteration.
Yay lets start an edition war!
I haven't followed 13th Age closely enough. What is it's fighter mechanic that you don't like?
"I like the game. I just don't like any of the parts which are involved with playing the game." huh?
What constitutes a "proper edition"?In my experience (DMing it consistently for 2 years), 4th Ed (very fun) is more of a skirmish/board-game variant of D&D, not a proper edition/iteration.
I'm really perplexed, Steely_Dan. It seems of late you've given up all pretense of debating in good faith. It's all secret agenda this, sinister motivation that.You would know!
...hey, I'm just relaying my experiences.
I'm really perplexed, Steely_Dan. It seems of late you've given up all pretense of debating in good faith. It's all secret agenda this, sinister motivation that.
-O
"I like roleplaying. The rules should be there to support that."
Doesn't that still require learning the rules?
If there is a player who is playing the game while simultaneously not caring enough about any of the elements involved with the game, I find that situation somewhat strange.
"I like the game. I just don't like any of the parts which are involved with playing the game." huh?
As for memorizing... well, that's kind of what the character sheet is for right? To write down basic information relevant to your interaction with the game world. There's no need to memorize much of anything.