D&D Next (5E) I'm just not that "Psyched" about Next.




+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)



    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Sunnydale
    Posts
    1,696

    ø Ignore ForeverSlayer

    I'm just not that "Psyched" about Next.

    I'm trying my hardest to get psyched about D&D Next but for some reason I'm just not feeling it. I've done the playtest and everything but I'm just losing the excitement day by day. I've actually been occupying most of my time Pathfinder.

    I don't know what it is but I'm just not digging Next.

    Anyone else feel the same?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)



    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    3,731

    ø Ignore Greg K
    I am not digging at this point either. 3e is my favorite edition, but there are elements from 2e and 4e I would love to see replace some of 3e's mechanics so my ideal would incorporate elements from all 3. However, Next despite drawing influence from various editions is not doing so in a way that I like.

    So far. the only things that I like about Next are Backgrounds and, for the most part, the skill list (I despised 4e's shorter list of broader skills). It is still early in development. Therefore, I have keeping up with it in hope that things will change. Lately, though I have to admit that I am losing interest, but this is due, in large part, to many posters at WOTC's boards and rpg.net.

    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverSlayer View Post
    I'm trying my hardest to get psyched about D&D Next but for some reason I'm just not feeling it. I've done the playtest and everything but I'm just losing the excitement day by day. I've actually been occupying most of my time Pathfinder.

    I don't know what it is but I'm just not digging Next.

    Anyone else feel the same?
    Last edited by Greg K; Sunday, 30th September, 2012 at 11:37 PM.
    MActor83% STeller75% Specialist75% Tactician 42% PGamer25% BKicker 17% CGamer 8%

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Animal's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Odessa
    Posts
    336

    ø Ignore Animal
    So you're not digging something that's currently in early development stages? Thanks for sharing.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Shadeydm's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    City of Champions
    Posts
    1,359

    ø Ignore Shadeydm
    At this point i'm probably more excited about 13th Age than 5E but a lot can change in 2 years...
    I hope with strange eons even the edition war may die.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Grandfather of Assassins (Lvl 19)

    Mark CMG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI 53147
    Posts
    8,505
    GM's Day CMG

    ø Ignore Mark CMG
    Yeah, it's very early in the process. Once they get the core game set and start adding some more bells and whistles, I'm guessing many who might not yet be excited will start giving it a more serious look.
    Fighting Fire - Ernie Gygax Relief Fund

    Please, help boost the signal!

    http://tinyurl.com/gygaxrelief

    As always,
    Mark CMG
    CreativeMountainGames.com

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Defender (Lvl 8)

    Raith5's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    686

    ø Ignore Raith5
    My mind changes regularly! I still personally prefer the 4th ed approach of tactical and mechanic heavy design but I like the way they are approaching things by attempting to go for multiple playstyles and a lot of playtesting in DDN. I think the next iteration of DDN in October is going to be important for keeping people interested in DDN.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    innerdude's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    583

    ø Ignore innerdude
    Some of it is that we simply don't have that much to go on yet. What will 5e really look like when it's done? Who knows. The Pathfinder beta play test was significantly different from the final PF core rules, for example, and 5e still has significant time until its official release.

    The other thing I have to keep asking myself is, what is 5e going to supplant in my group's existing play set? We already have one GM running GURPS, I'm running Savage Worlds on the side as a diversion on our GURPS "off weeks"; we have a Pathfinder campaign on hiatus that I ran last year; I'm dying to get a full-blown Fantasy Craft campaign rolling.....

    And no offence to WotC, but any brand loyalty I might have felt for the D&D name is looooooong gone out the 4e window.

    Unless I'm 100% convinced that D&D Next is going to blow my existing options out of the water, why would our group change up what we're already doing?

    So far, 5e looks like just another interesting d20 fantasy variant......and I've already got like, six of those.
    Last edited by innerdude; Monday, 1st October, 2012 at 12:58 AM.
    Battling the worldwide midget infestation since 1987.....

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Guide (Lvl 11)



    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    3,731

    ø Ignore Greg K
    Quote Originally Posted by innerdude View Post
    The other thing I have to keep asking myself is, what is 5e going to supplant in my group's existing play set? We already have one GM running GURPS, I'm running Savage Worlds on the side as a diversion on our GURPS "off weeks"; we have a Pathfinder campaign on hiatus that I ran last year; I'm dying to get a full-blown Fantasy Craft campaign rolling.....

    And no offence to WotC, but any brand loyalty I might have felt for the D&D name is looooooong gone out the 4e window.

    Unless I'm 100% convinced that D&D Next is going to blow my existing options out of the water, why would our group change up what we're already doing?

    So far, 5e looks like just another interesting d20 fantasy variant......and I've already got like, six of those.
    Yeah, at this point, I have Savage Worlds for non- d20, True20 for class/level based d20 (if a group does not want Savage Worlds) and a house ruled 3e if a group wants Fantasy d20 class/level based other than True20 (not that I am 100% satisfied with the house ruled 3e. There are still some things I want to alter).
    MActor83% STeller75% Specialist75% Tactician 42% PGamer25% BKicker 17% CGamer 8%

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Magsman (Lvl 14)

    Li Shenron's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Edition-shifting
    Posts
    9,915
    Forgotten Realms Planescape Rokugan D&D

    ø Ignore Li Shenron
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverSlayer View Post
    I'm trying my hardest to get psyched about D&D Next but for some reason I'm just not feeling it. I've done the playtest and everything but I'm just losing the excitement day by day. I've actually been occupying most of my time Pathfinder.

    I don't know what it is but I'm just not digging Next.

    Anyone else feel the same?
    I am fairly excited and generally very interested in 5e, but the big boost of excitement for me will only come when I (hopefully) see a gorgeous printed book with fantastic artwork
    "There is no survival without order, there is no evolution without chaos."
    "You have to see past the RAW to understand the rules of the game."
    "And rules are OVERRATED by the way!

  10. #10
    Yes, 2nd iteration is a little bitt too complex. especially the big 4 classes. The sorcerer however as it stands now is a good example of a class i would like.

    For the base game, the choice of a class, and a race is enough. No subrace, no scheme, no tradition, no fighting style... But as options, there should be things to replace the default choices: thief without backstab: here is a scheme you could replace the thief scheme with. A swashbuckler: swap soldier for it. A specialized mage: lose some things and gain some encounter powers. But please, make simple default classes and than add a chapter with advanced otions for the experienced players. And of course, think about how a class advances.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. PS3: "Final Fantasy XIII", "The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" or "Dragon Age: Origins"?
    By Goodsport in forum Miscellaneous Geek Talk & Media Lounge
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Thursday, 5th August, 2010, 11:24 AM
  2. Combining "d20 Past" with "Urban Arcana" to make "d20 Fantasy"
    By Jack Daniel in forum D&D and Pathfinder
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Tuesday, 3rd May, 2005, 06:22 AM
  3. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken" IC
    By Tor L'Tha in forum Playing the Game
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Tuesday, 14th December, 2004, 07:26 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 07:19 PM
  5. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken"
    By Tor L'Tha in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 07:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •