+ Log in or register to post
Results 11 to 20 of 36
Wednesday, 10th October, 2012, 09:20 PM #11
I mean, I get that players don't want to show up for a session and hear the DM say "your fighter suddenly and inexplicably gave up adventuring and started up life as a pipeweed farmer until being called back into action five years later", but surely any reasonable DM will work with the player and take the character's nature into account to determine what the player did (within his control) during the intervening time.
I wasn't thinking so much travel, which is easy to explain, but more along the lines of "the PCs overwinter at the lord's keep during the harshest snow months and resume adventuring when spring returns.""Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose"
- EN World
- has no influence
- on adverts that
- are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Wednesday, 10th October, 2012, 09:40 PM #12
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
I might be leary of having large jumps in time (I've done 5 years), but having some time pass between adventures or story arcs always seems reasonable.
I generally look at whatever "safe" situation the PC has going on will continue and probably prosper.
So a PC who owns a meadery, will find, "nothing horrible" has happened to cause him to adventure or get overly involved, so he focussed on his meadery, growing the business, etc. A year or so passes.
Then, as cue up to the new adventure, rumblings in the industry, supply chain issues crop up.
This is of course the hook into the adventure, but it also reflects that the PC won't complain if time passes because he's on auto-pilot to success. He wants control when he needs to take the reins. Which is when problems arise.
Which is exactly when the adventure starts.
Wednesday, 10th October, 2012, 09:59 PM #13
I currently have a druid player who is the owner of the kingdoms largest wheat farm which features something like five seperate hamlets. As a result he has been made a baron, he is a known merchant-prince, and as he is also the highest ranking druid in the area, he has befreinded the local dryads and gathered his own following who have established a druids glade. The fighter player has been made commander of the Royal Legions and is also owner of a tower (formerly occupied by a Necromancer) and the adjacent village. We also had a ranger but after sacrificing himself to defeat the Dark Hunter he became a semi-sentient oak tree.
Anyway due to the farming I run the game on a seasons basis (2 per year) and lots of plots are directly linked to the farming cycle (currently they are dealing with a blight that has swept through the region...)
Originally Posted by IcyCoolSpoiler:
Thursday, 11th October, 2012, 12:40 AM #14
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
I'm all for a bit of fast forward of down time. And letting the PCs do "cool stuff" in that time too.
One thing to add to the above advice is consider doing it via Blue Booking. A few emails back and forth can be fun and doesn't take up valuable gaming time. And of course you can keep them all and let all the players read them. Good funs for all.
Just making it up as I go along.
Thursday, 11th October, 2012, 10:32 PM #15
Defender (Lvl 8)
In my past campaigns, skips in time actually tend to be driven by the PCs. This is normally due to down time for crafting, or embarking in business ventures. As a whole, we tended to summarize the events, and would make any die rolls needed for specific outcomes vice role playing a month, or more, of "crafting" stories.
Though, in my last campaign, the characters were further north in the world, in an area that would get pretty harsh winters. So, as a event of seasonal change, the characters would plan their undertakings around knowing that travel and such would be difficult during the winter. That meant that the winter months were effectively down time and unless the PCs wanted to do something in particular (like crafting or research), we tended to summarize what happened and skip forward to spring and the start of the campaining season.
In no cases did I have anyone balk or complain, it was just accepted as how things worked.
Friday, 12th October, 2012, 12:19 AM #16
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
I have had time pass with no problems, and time pass with lots of player interruptions and/or objections.
Currently im running a Kingmaker style game, and after 2 months of constant problems, 5 months passed as they waited for the summer solstice.
after discussing pacing with the players we have moved to 1 active adventure per game month model.
But to be honest I have trouble with it too. I can't resist things happening, like a new group of mercanries coming to town, a hostile takeover of the street gang that one PC grew up with, or a grain plague and food riots.
(all of which happened in the PCs down time.)
The most I have fiated is 3 years, when the group took a break, and played other games. Everyone had gained 1 level in downtime.
Friday, 12th October, 2012, 12:43 AM #17
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
Time passing without playing normally means a missed opportunity to get XP.
That's one of the factors to player resistance.
Hand out 300XP times level per year, and that'll probably cover it. Anybody who was on the edge of leveling up just got a bump. At it scales nicely with the level multiplier to mean the same thing to all PCs (which is 3/10th advancement to the next level).
Friday, 12th October, 2012, 01:24 AM #18
Friday, 12th October, 2012, 02:13 AM #19
Scout (Lvl 6)
I think the time jump usage should vary with genre and level.
- Any thing with long amount of travel (sci-fi/sailing)- time jump
- High level play where PCs have non-adventure related obligations- time jump
- Low level- no jumps, because a long jump could/should have a level up
- Contract based game- time jump
The reason why I like time jumps for higher level play is that it allows the PCs to gain avenues of power that may not be helpful in combat, but can increase some difficulty for higher level characters. When a fighter starts to command troops, suddenly he is (should be IMO) splitting his worry with his old adventuring pals and his recruits. PCs getting involved with organizations that are mostly off screen allow those to tie into adventures.
I love being able to use the things they do to impact the PCs lives. Someone wants to open a business- great! But without her shrewd managing skills, the business doesn't do so well while she meets her companions to lay siege to the White Castle where the lich Kylar the Butcher is recovering from the last fight with the party. Now when she gets back she needs to focus on repairing her business and finding a new manager. Alternatively, she can come back and everything is fine but a gang is asking for protection money. Now she can get the party involved in helping the City Watch take down the Red Scorpions.
From the games I have played, higher level characters are harder to challenge, and the players enjoy being rewarded for making it this far. So, to help them feel powerful some threats can be toned down. A plague won't hurt the party (saves are too high) but it can wipe out the fighter's fledgling infantry company and the cleric's church members. Now the party has personal reasons to stop the plague.
As a GM I want my players to become invested in their characters and the game world. Letting their characters achieve the player's personal goals, and then putting that in danger helps the player become protective and more invested. I love using their ideas for bait in adventures to hook them.
Friday, 12th October, 2012, 05:05 AM #20
Lama (Lvl 13)
I played in a game where we finished off a quest thinking that the bad guy had teleported us somewhere. After three or four sessions, we figured out that, due to a poorly worded wish/gift from Loki, we were actually about 500ish years in the future, and our previous adventures and deeds existed as scraps of folklore from a nearly forgotten civilization.
Supposedly, the entire thing was a spur of the moment idea on the part of the DM, and he ended up uprooting a game world he had been building and working on for about half his life.