silverblade56
First Post
That's kind of irrelevant. Who has a level 40 character they actually play
Make a monk/sorcerer not suck.
Matthew Ashburn
First Post
makes sense to me,you get 2 capstones at the very least
Empirate
First Post
Why do you even want to mix those two specific classes? After all, classes are just an out-of-game concept to provide us with options when building our characters' mechanical aspects. So who do you envision your character to be, capability-wise and where his/her role in and out of combat is concerned? That's the question(s) you need to answer first.
Spells plus some kewl stunts plus some unarmed martial prowess seems to be (on the surface) what your question implies you're looking for. It may be that the best mechanical representation of that idea or concept is not a Monk/Sorcerer, but a pure Sorcerer, a Sorcerer/Rogue, or even a Cleric or Oracle or Inquisitor or something. I believe a Sorcerer (dragon bloodline)/Dragon Disciple, reflavored as you see fit, with the right spell selection, might pull that off, and be just as effective as a pure Monk in combat, if entirely different mechanically. So might a Wizard/Fighter/Eldritch Knight, though.
So what's your role?
(of course it's entirely possible you just want to play around with the mechanics of the specific class combo you mentioned. In which case, I can confidently tell you: doesn't work, sorry)
Spells plus some kewl stunts plus some unarmed martial prowess seems to be (on the surface) what your question implies you're looking for. It may be that the best mechanical representation of that idea or concept is not a Monk/Sorcerer, but a pure Sorcerer, a Sorcerer/Rogue, or even a Cleric or Oracle or Inquisitor or something. I believe a Sorcerer (dragon bloodline)/Dragon Disciple, reflavored as you see fit, with the right spell selection, might pull that off, and be just as effective as a pure Monk in combat, if entirely different mechanically. So might a Wizard/Fighter/Eldritch Knight, though.
So what's your role?
(of course it's entirely possible you just want to play around with the mechanics of the specific class combo you mentioned. In which case, I can confidently tell you: doesn't work, sorry)
Herobizkit
Adventurer
Is the 3.5 Gestalt option cheating?
KradNevar
Explorer
Silver I am looking into this as a potential candidate for my next build. Would you be willing to share your build? My email is ncthunderson@yahoo.com thanks Mitch.
Are you building in D&D, PF, or some kind of other 3.x RPG? What material can you use?
If you want to do some looking yourself, check the Monk an Martial Arcanist links in my sig.
If you want to do some looking yourself, check the Monk an Martial Arcanist links in my sig.
Tim Freerksen
First Post
Not really, monks are always slowburners. They are suboptimal in the beginning but eventually become very powerful, especially with some monk only items.
The big problem with a Monk/Sorcerer is the fact that charisma is completely irrelevant to a monk while it is needed for a sorc.
Well, if you’re worried about MAD’s effect on your spellcasting...
You could always take a bunch of spells that don’t depend as much on Cha for efficacy, while using the spell-channeling Sorcerer or Reserve feats that fit your PC concept while providing some combat utility.
You could always take a bunch of spells that don’t depend as much on Cha for efficacy, while using the spell-channeling Sorcerer or Reserve feats that fit your PC concept while providing some combat utility.
Similar Threads
