Eschatolic Dragons: The Upper End of Ridiculous - Page 5
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 48 of 48
  1. #41
    Makes sense for unbeings, but sidereals aren't really a threat towards Time Lords and Demiurges

    "While the eternals themselves border on the omnipotent, their existence is challenged by equally powerful creatures including: anomalies (eternal abominations); hyperforms"

    a 255 HD mega-elemental first one sounds like a snack for a 300+ HD demiurge

    i kinda feel like hyperforms would just be really big things, or just super powerful random creatures; more or less the Eternals would be the races, the hyperforms the animals, and eschatols the dragons

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Apepsnake View Post
    Makes sense for unbeings, but sidereals aren't really a threat towards Time Lords and Demiurges

    "While the eternals themselves border on the omnipotent, their existence is challenged by equally powerful creatures including: anomalies (eternal abominations); hyperforms"

    a 255 HD mega-elemental first one sounds like a snack for a 300+ HD demiurge

    i kinda feel like hyperforms would just be really big things, or just super powerful random creatures; more or less the Eternals would be the races, the hyperforms the animals, and eschatols the dragons
    Ah I wasn't sure what source material you were referring to. I was dead reckoning and just gave my best guess. But, with that said, I agree nothing of anything less than 500 hit dice at least unless specifically designed for the sole task of 'fighting' a Time Lord.

    I don't know if I would exactly lump all the beings into similar clades as normal animals and plants and such but I see where your coming from and shorthand wise for storyline purposes it makes sense.

  3. #43
    I suppose in my campaigns a Hyperform would be like a Hyperborean High Council member or a High Legionarre. I also make a group of Transexistential threats known as Pleromic Phenominon which are the next stage up from Anomalies as Anomalies at that level are basically floor lint to Monads.

    Hyperform? Lol

  4. #44
    makes sense, they are CR 600+ and are "forms," yeah it does make sense to make a new version of 8D abominations, thanks for the input

    also your dergs are good starting points for Muhlatimic dragons, and i made a general grouping of them (want some of the really big numbers stuff?)

    And the input on un-beings has led to the conclusion that they are essentially just eternal level umbrals

    (also here's the whole quote: "While the eternals themselves border on the omnipotent, their existence is challenged by equally powerful creatures including: anomalies (eternal abominations); hyperforms; nehaschimic dragons; quantum golems; spectrals; transelementals and un-beings, as well as other eternals of course.")

    we pretty much know what spectrals are (pretty much just reflections of eternals that challenge them), and transelementals are pretty much Satan (first one of matter) on steroids

  5. #45
    Interesting. I think the Sundered work pretty well as spectrals. An incorporeal dead Monad. ftn. Transelementals might be congruent with my Raagens. I may stat out a few once im done making those. Hmm.

  6. #46

  7. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Apepsnake View Post
    boy what a ragu?
    Dayum dawg, dochube even reedin ma sheeyit son? Dem raagens are elemental dragons, living batteries of pure elemental or at higher orders transelemental and even pure conceptual energy, ragu be a pasta sauce dawg. CHEEEYAH!

  8. #48
    so they're just elementals but dragons and then they kill you
    n i c e

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Upper Krust, Come Hidda :)
    By Liquide in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Wednesday, 4th December, 2002, 08:32 PM
  2. Upper Krust, come hidda :)
    By Liquide in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, 4th December, 2002, 12:22 PM
  3. Question for Upper Krust
    By Amen-Zulu in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Monday, 7th October, 2002, 12:28 PM
  4. Question for Upper Krust
    By justinsluder in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sunday, 15th September, 2002, 09:06 PM
  5. Hey Upper Krust!
    By bing in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: Thursday, 16th May, 2002, 10:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •