Homicidal_Squirrel
Adventurer
Citation?I'm not saying it, they are. Self-reported rates of being under the influence while on screen vary from 70-99%.
Right, but those kids are still being taken advantage of and exploited, and possibly sexually abused behind closed doors. The point is, they are still selling underage sex.Sexualizatuon of kids is bad, and it's not limited to Hollywood.
But films of sex with the underaged released as a product is worse.
Of course it does. This goes back to the other thread Bullgrit started about the one nighters, and the U.S. having all these sexual hangups. The porn industry has always been seen as some evil thing because sex is bad. Whenever you get one of these news stories about some underage kid performing in it, it's a gotcha! moment, and the media jumps all over it. The same rarely happens in Hollywood, it seems.No, the difference is the degrees of actual problematic behavior. Media attention has zero to do with it- the incidental vices of Hollywood are the business model of porn.
So because the Coreys' sexual abuse wasn't sold as a product it isn't as bad? Also, have you considered the B-movie side of Hollywood? Most of those movies are just T&A movies where young girls and put on screen and they simulate sex. While it's not actual sex (assuming that actual sex never occurs), I'm betting there are some actors who also use drugs to get through those scenes.The 2 Coreys were drugged out and abused, but they weren't drugged so that they could perform; they weren't sexually abused on screen as part of one of their films. They didn't make films against their will or without knowing they were being filmed. OTOH, there are porn actors who had exactly those things happen to them.
The fact is, there is no way to prove that claim. There is no way you can prove that more people are victimized in porn than in Hollywood. Sure, you might be right, the porn industry could be significantly worse than Hollywood. You could also be wrong, and Hollywood could be significantly worse than the porn industry. In fact, the rate of victimization could be exactly the same in both industries. By the way, I'm not saying one is better/worse than the other. I'm saying we can't be sure.Don't get me wrong- there are activists who are doing their damndest to clean up the porn industry, and it IS getting better. But the porn world is orders of magnitude more dependent on victimization of "the talent" than is Hollywood.
In any case, saying that you have a "moral dilemma" that prevents you from working in one industry compared to another because of "the degree" to which you perceive it to occur in one industry seems like a cop-out. It's still occurring in both industries. So it isn't what is happening in the industry that bothers you, it's just how much you think it happens.