Scrivener of Doom
Adventurer
As someone who used to work for a major bank, not this specific one, I can tell you that most of these policies are not for legal reasons. It's simply an attempt to get you to open an account with them. The personal bankers perfomance reviews and bonuses are based upon the number of accounts they open. I can't tell you the number of times I had to help senior citizens close checking accounts when they realized they had 3 or 4 extra they didn't remember and were accruing fees on. It's one of the reasons I no longer work there.
That's closer to the truth than the anti-money laundering argument.
On its own, probably not - but it's an easy matter to split a larger sum, then spend a little time depositing it piecemeal over days or weeks, if doing so will keep you under the radar.
No it isn't.
Australia has one of the most sophisticated anti-money laundering regimes in the world and this sort of behaviour is picked up by the software used by the government bureau that targets money laundering. Australia is not a police state so you can guarantee that if it has this sort of software, the US will have the same or better.
That's why Umbran's locks on houses = small cash deposits breaks down: the software the authorities use can monitor this sort of behaviour... which is why <!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention --> @was <!-- END TEMPLATE: dbtech_usertag_mention --> 's post was actually a more accurate assessment of the truth.
everybody knows you ask the former drug addict magazine solicitor on how to launder money!
I don't think crooks launder money in banks. They use dry cleaners and other cash-predominant businesses. Didn't you guys watch Breaking Bad?
Laundering money through cash is one of the most inefficient ways of laundering money. The big players use offshore banking facilities, and I am not talking about the myth of Swiss bank accounts (Swiss bank accounts are nothing but a red flag: never use one).
However, drug dealers need to launder cash and that's where casinos and racetracks come in... as does the physical shipment of cash to friendlier jurisdictions. For the USA, you have the Caymans et al only a short flight/boat trip away and real money laundering of cash involves smuggling said cash to places like the Caymans. Once it's in a bank of any sort, it's really easy to start moving the money around and having it return to source a lot cleaner than when it started.
But stopping a deposit of USD500 in cash? Don't believe the rhetoric. It's complete BS.
Last edited: