Sardior is back!

C

Claude Raines

First Post

• Jan 24, 2003

• #1

Finally, the gem dragons are once again complete with Sardior, the Ruby Dragon, at the WotC website. He's done up with full diety stats like Bahamut and Tiamat.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

J

justfisch

First Post

• Jan 24, 2003

• #2

Why did they make the obsidian gem dragon Neutral Evil?

cio,
justfisch

 

MythandLore

First Post

• Jan 24, 2003

• #3

justfisch said:

Why did they make the obsidian gem dragon Neutral Evil?

Click to expand...

Sardior once had a sixth thane: Seradess, a female advanced obsidian dragon, but he destroyed her and banished the obsidian dragons from his court. Even his own clergy argue the reason behind this decision.

Click to expand...

Because they are black, and black = evil in dnd.

Their just trying to keep the brotherman/elf down.

____

BTW I posted this yesterday.
http://enworld.cyberstreet.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38441

 

Last edited: Jan 24, 2003

BOZ

Creature Cataloguer

• Jan 24, 2003

• #4

so who's is better, their or mine?

 

Z

ZAR22

Villager

• Aug 22, 2018

• #5

It's not because they are black, it's what their leader did, and plus, it's good they are removed, they aren't even GEMS!!! It would be different if they where onyx dragons, which is a gem.

 

ccs

41st lv DM

• Aug 22, 2018

• #6

ZAR22 said:

It's not because they are black, it's what their leader did, and plus, it's good they are removed, they aren't even GEMS!!! It would be different if they where onyx dragons, which is a gem.

Click to expand...

Hey, new guy, stop playing with dead things!

 

Z

ZAR22

Villager

• Aug 22, 2018

• #7

Stop playing with dead things, what dead things?

 

Ancalagon

Dusty Dragon

• Aug 22, 2018

• #8

ZAR22 said:

Stop playing with dead things, what dead things?

Click to expand...

You replied to a thread that was 15 years old. This is called "thread necromancy"

Now there are some times where it *is* appropriate to resurrect an old thread but in this case it's baffling. But don't worry, it's a common newbie mistake - welcome to EN world!

 

Z

ZAR22

Villager

• Aug 22, 2018

• #9

I didn't know that you couldn't respond to a thread, regardless of it being open to the public, a topic I want to answer, and something that interests me. Plus, i dont see whats wrong with it, and how is it you two came in here, does it update ever one on this site about this posts update? If so, than that's the only thing NEW to me. I am not THAT big a newbie. Just didnt know only certain things were only allowed to have revivals.

 

Dannyalcatraz

Schmoderator

Staff member

Supporter

• Aug 22, 2018

• #10

There really isn’t a rule against thread necromancy, but many times, it’s pretty pointless.