Cyberbullying 101. Oh and nice use of the unnamed "We" - You mean you, don't you. Yeah, thought so.We would much rather you agreed the feat needs errata, or at the very least stayed silent.
Cyberbullying 101. Oh and nice use of the unnamed "We" - You mean you, don't you. Yeah, thought so.We would much rather you agreed the feat needs errata, or at the very least stayed silent.
I'd love to see someone count how many posts have been spent on this topic. Before someone says it would e a massive waste of time to count them, it has been years since anyone had anything new to say on this topic. Spending time counting the posts rather than writing them would at least provide something new.
What about this:
Instead of the -5/+10, you just get to add your proficiency bonus to damage. That way it scales with level.
2x level would be too strong at later levels. Compare an at-will benefit having the kill threshold of 40 HP at Lv. 20 to, say, the Paladin's Banishing Smite (50 HP) or Power Word Kill (100 HP, and a 9th level spell).
I think 5 + level could work though. Would make it even stronger than 2x level at the lowest levels, but would still be reasonable at higher levels.
How about -5 hit to for bonus damage equal to the amount you hit by? Just a thought I have not done any maths on it.
How about -10 to hit and +10 damage.
I think people would still use it quite a bit.
I'd love to see someone count how many posts have been spent on this topic. Before someone says it would e a massive waste of time to count them, it has been years since anyone had anything new to say on this topic. Spending time counting the posts rather than writing them would at least provide something new.