Quartz
Hero
I wouldn't change them, but if I did, perhaps replace the +1 STAT with a skill proficiency?
For which feats would that be appropriate and which skills would be appropriate for those feats?
I wouldn't change them, but if I did, perhaps replace the +1 STAT with a skill proficiency?
I think each of those suggestions take the feats in a markedly different direction - sometimes in ways that would have significant consequences.
No longer suffer disadvantage on Stealth from heavy armor? Do you *want* rogues running around in plate mail? Because that's how you get rogues running around in plate mail.
For which feats would that be appropriate and which skills would be appropriate for those feats?
To not have players choosing the feats for the stat bump.
If you wanted a stat bump, you could just take a stat bump. So, you never choose a feat *for* the bump.
If you wanted a stat bump, you could just take a stat bump. So, you never choose a feat *for* the bump.
You may feel the feat becomes worhtwhile if it has the stat bump, but it isn't *for* the bump itself.
Ah, okay - that makes sense.Sorry, I accidentally trimmed my post. The idea is to not have stat bumps at all: no racial stat bumps, no stat bumps from feats.
If you wanted a stat bump, you could just take a stat bump. So, you never choose a feat *for* the bump.
You may feel the feat becomes worhtwhile if it has the stat bump, but it isn't *for* the bump itself.