What's on your mind?
+ Log in or register to post
Results 11 to 20 of 69
Thread: Is my Web site legal?
Sunday, 2nd November, 2003, 11:22 PM #11
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
Originally Posted by Kesh
I kept the e-mail and that's a direct quote.
You're right, though--according to his own PI and Closed Content declarations, they should be closed, no?
Anyway, back to me. Anyone see anything on the site that's just screaming "ILLEGAL!"
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Sunday, 2nd November, 2003, 11:23 PM #12
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
The spell templates from Dragon were open content. You can use those, or derive from them, in an OGL product if you want. That doesn't make the ones from Arcana Unearthed open content.Originally Posted by DM Magic
I'm going to go the other way from some people on this thread. You're not an OGL publisher, therefore the specifics of the open game license and the open content declarations shouldn't matter to you at all. Putting up a webpage doesn't make you an OGL publisher. If it did, I couldn't legally mention Sigil in this comment, because it's declared to be product identity in the SRD. Piratecat couldn't talk about Mind Flayers in his story hour, because they're closed content. Luckily for all three of us, those types of things don't qualify as OGL products.
You are still bound by traditional copyright and trademark law. So you couldn't, for instance, copy a big section of the description of "Mojhes" from AU. But mentioning them is fine. I don't have acrobat on this computer, but if those "akashic.pdf", "magister.pdf", etc, are copied from the AU book, you're in the wrong there, copyright wise.
Whether or not "heightened" or "diminished" is closed content matters not a whit to you, because the words can't be copyrighted, and concepts and game mechanics can't be copyrighted, only specific texts thereof. And small quotes for reference are fine even from that. If you're not pasting big sections of the book onto your website, you're fine.
Really, I think publishers using technicalities of license law against small fan sites is mean-spirited, and if you're going to get the law used against you, use it right back. It's only fair.
Sunday, 2nd November, 2003, 11:46 PM #13
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
They're not. You should get Adobe! I'd love to hear your opnion.Originally Posted by DanMcS
It matters to me because I don't just "mention" those words or concepts--I reprint the mechanics behind those words for my players. You see, not all of my players have the money to buy Arcana Unearthed. In fact, I wouldn't want them to! (Unless they just wanted a copy because it's such a DAMN COOL setting!) You see, I use a bit from here, a bit from there--nothing really worth buying the book over. So instead, I reprint the mechanics I use. In most instances, I tweak it or change it to fit my setting. I even change the wording so that it's easier to read for me and my players! So clearly, we're talking about "derivative works" here.Originally Posted by DanMcS
In some cases, I am--if I know it's Open Content. Which is what this is all about. What is Open, and what do I have to change so I won't get into trouble?Originally Posted by DanMcS
That's what I'm trying to avoid.Originally Posted by DanMcS
Sunday, 2nd November, 2003, 11:57 PM #14
Novice (Lvl 1)
Some things are quite definitely public domain. How many people, for example, know that the Akashic (or Akasic) is in fact an old element of real-world psychic culture (possibly dating back to the 19th century)? And is possibly based on an ancient Hindu element ('atmosphere, ether')? (I'd give dates and figures, but the Oxford has failed me this day.)
The implementation thereof, however, is the author's perogative. Words are cheap (normally free). Strings of words are not.
Webcomic Adventure in Medieval Europe
... but not your Europe
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 12:03 AM #15
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
I did!Originally Posted by s/LaSH
The classes are designated as Open Content, just their respective descriptive text is not. Which I replaced with my own world-specific material anyway.Originally Posted by s/LaSH
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 01:17 AM #16
Well since your using the d20 system logo that means your site must conform to the D20 System License and D20 System Guide, which among other things means you need to have an OGL statement declaring whats OGC and whats not on your site. Once you have declared in your OGL statement what material on your site is OGC/PI belonging to you and what is OGC from other publishers you might have a better time of figuring out what your legal with and not. You have a link to a legal information page but it currently is not in conformation with itself. You have a couple of copyright notcies but no declarations of your own OGC and PI, nor what material is OGC from other publishers on your site. None of your PDF's have conforming OGL statements either.
I think Monte had the right of it, untill you can fix it and conform to the D20 SL/SG and OGL you need to lock the site up.
If you had not used the d20 SL/SG and OGL you could have simply done up your site under normal copyright laws dealing with games. Which would give you more flexibility in some things and less flexibility in others in what you could or couldnt display from Arcana Unearthed for your campaign setting. Meaning you could use all the names and statistical information along with stat formatting(template/stat blocks), of races, classes,skills,feats,spells,powers but none of the descriptive text for those things which is literary and falls under normal copyright laws. Also you mention derivitive works which if your not using the D20 SL/SG and OGL does not apply to game mechanics or blocks of stats for the game but only to the literary text.
Anyhow, the way you got it setup now your a lawsuit thats already happened, just that nobodies filed against you yet. Because your most assurredly not in compliance with the D20 SL/SG and OGL.
Last edited by rpgHQ; Monday, 3rd November, 2003 at 01:18 AM.
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 01:53 AM #17
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
You didn't look hard enough. But that's okay--it's a large site!Originally Posted by rpgHQ
Every PDF has a copy of the OGL. As far as the declarations, they can be found here: http://www.3rdedition.org/dungeonmag...variations.pdf
As far as I know, I don't have to include a "declaration" on EVERY document--just the title page. When you print out the PDFs, the above link goes to the title page. The only thing that every PDF needs to have is a copy of the OGL.
Am I right or wrong? Now's the time to correct me if I'm wrong!
As far as I know, I am conforming to the d20 System License when the above is taken into account.Originally Posted by rpgHQ
I'm assuming that this harsh comment is in err because you didn't realize that I am in compliance with the OGL. Unless there's something I'm missing that you failed to mention?Originally Posted by rpgHQ
Last edited by DM Magic; Monday, 3rd November, 2003 at 02:37 AM.
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 06:24 AM #18
Novice (Lvl 1)
Akashic also appears in other game content that predates Monte's work. The Akashic Brotherhood from Mage: the Ascension is an example of the use of the word. However, the work Akashic comes from the Hindu word Akasha which did represent the fifth element (spirit) In M:tA, the Akashic Brotherhood's primary sphere is Mind, not Spirit, and are based more on the Shaolin then anything else. Go figure.Some things are quite definitely public domain. How many people, for example, know that the Akashic (or Akasic) is in fact an old element of real-world psychic culture (possibly dating back to the 19th century)? And is possibly based on an ancient Hindu element ('atmosphere, ether')? (I'd give dates and figures, but the Oxford has failed me this day.)
Heimdall, Dwarven Guardian
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 06:25 AM #19
I have a question about this. Can Monte Cook even make spell templates closed content and remain in compliance with the d20 and OGL licenses? I thought that anything derivative of the SRD is automatically open content, thus any new rules based on the SRD rules must therefore be open - no? Maybe someone who understands the licenses better knows.Originally Posted by DM Magic
Monday, 3rd November, 2003, 06:45 AM #20
Myrmidon (Lvl 10)
This is a good point. However, it's a little vague. Wouldnĺt anything made for d20 be a derivative of the SRD? If not, where does the SRD end and new material begin?Originally Posted by kenjib
I posted a thread over at Monte's forums, hoping to get help straight from the horse's mouth. Guess what they did? They locked the thread.
That's the second time I've asked for help and been shut down over there.