dcollins
Explorer
No, that's not altogether a helpful response. Unfortunately, it seems to be inspired by the assumption that no one here could read or understand the legalese.
The major problems with what has been written are yet unanswered, including:
- Is this intentionally forbidding non-ESD conversions, or is that just an oversight?
The "legal out" at the end is of course easy to imagine the corporate motivation for. However, the explanation given above is truly not compelling. If copyright violations were endemic, cancelling this supplemental license would not change the situation.
The major problems with what has been written are yet unanswered, including:
- Is this intentionally forbidding non-ESD conversions, or is that just an oversight?
The "legal out" at the end is of course easy to imagine the corporate motivation for. However, the explanation given above is truly not compelling. If copyright violations were endemic, cancelling this supplemental license would not change the situation.