Official D&D Sage Advice Compendium Updated

Sorry if someone already posted this, but yesterday the Sage Advice Compendium got updated...

Sorry if someone already posted this, but yesterday the Sage Advice Compendium got updated: http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/sage-advice/sage-advice-compendium.

New things:

[NEW]
[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Can a dragonborn sorcerer with a draconic bloodline have two different kinds of Draconic Ancestry? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]A dragonborn sorcerer can choose a different ancestor for the racial trait and for the Dragon Ancestor feature. Your choice for the racial trait is your actual ancestor, while the choice for the class feature could be your ancestor figuratively—the type of dragon that bestowed magic upon you or your family or the kind of draconic artifact or location that filled you with magical energy.

[NEW]
[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Do the benefits from Bardic Inspiration and the [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]guidance [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]spell stack? Can they be applied to the same roll? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Yes, different effects stack if they don’t have the same name. If a creature makes an ability check while it is under the effect of a [FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]guidance [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]spell and also has a Bardic Inspiration die, it can roll both a d4 and a d6 if it so chooses.

[NEW]
[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Is the intent that a bard gets to know the number rolled on an attack roll or ability check before using Cutting Words, or should they always guess? If used on a damage roll, does Cutting Words apply to any kind of damage roll including an auto-hit spell like [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]magic missile[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]
You can wait to use Cutting Words after the roll, but you must commit to doing so before you know for sure whether the total of the roll or check is a success or a failure. You can use Cutting Words to reduce the damage from any effect that calls for a damage roll (including [FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]magic missile[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]) even if the damage roll is not preceded by an attack roll.


[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Does the fighter’s Action Surge feature let you take an extra bonus action, in addition to an extra action? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Action Surge gives you an extra action, not an extra bonus action. (Recent printings of the [FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Player’s Handbook [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]no longer include the wording that provoked this question.)




[NEW]


[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Can a bound and gagged druid simply use Wild Shape to get out? It’s hard to capture someone who can turn into a mouse at will. [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Transforming into a different size can be an effective way of escaping, depending on the nature of the bonds or confinement. All things considered, someone trying to keep a druid captive might be wise to stash the prisoner in a room with an opening only large enough for air to enter.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Can a monk use Stunning Strike with an unarmed strike, even though unarmed strikes aren’t weapons? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Yes. Stunning Strike works with melee weapon attacks, and an unarmed strike is a special type of melee weapon attack. The game often makes exceptions to general rules, and this is an important exception: that unarmed strikes count as melee weapon attacks despite not being weapons.


[NEW]


[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Can the rogue’s Reliable Talent feature be used in conjunction with Remarkable Athlete or Jack of All Trades? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]No. Each of these features has a precondition for its use; Reliable Talent activates when you make an ability check that uses your proficiency bonus, whereas the other two features activate when you make an ability check that doesn’t use your proficiency bonus. In other words, a check that qualifies for Reliable Talent doesn’t qualify for Remarkable Athlete or Jack of All Trades. And Remarkable Athlete and Jack of All Trades don’t work with each other, since you can add your proficiency bonus, or any portion thereof, only once to a roll.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]The Shield Master feat lets you shove someone as a bonus action if you take the Attack action. Can you take that bonus action before the Attack action? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]No. The bonus action provided by the Shield Master feat has a precondition: that you take the Attack action on your turn. Intending to take that action isn’t sufficient; you must actually take it before you can take the bonus action. During your turn, you do get to decide when to take the bonus action after you’ve taken the Attack action. This sort of if-then setup appears in many of the game’s rules. The "if" must be satisfied before the "then" comes into play.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Is there a hard limit on how many short rests characters can take in a day, or is this purely up to the DM to decide? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]The only hard limit on the number of short rests you can take is the number of hours in a day. In practice, you’re also limited by time pressures in the story and foes interrupting.

[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]If the damage from [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]disintegrate [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]reduces a half-orc to 0 hit points, can Relentless Endurance prevent the orc from turning to ash? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Yes. The [FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]disintegrate [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]spell turns you into dust only if the spell’s damage leaves you with 0 hit points. If you’re a half-orc, Relentless Endurance can turn the 0 into a 1 before the spell can disintegrate you.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]What happens if a druid using Wild Shape is reduced to 0 hit points by [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]disintegrate[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]? Does the druid simply leave beast form? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]The druid leaves beast form. As usual, any leftover damage then applies to the druid’s normal hit points. If the leftover damage leaves the druid with 0 hit points, the druid is disintegrated.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Using 5-foot squares, does [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]cloud of daggers [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]affect a single square? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Cloud of daggers [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT](5 ft. cube) can affect more than one square on a grid, unless the DM says effects snap to the grid. There are many ways to position that cube.




[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]What actions can monsters use to make opportunity attacks? Are Multiattack and breath weapon actions allowed? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]A monster follows the normal opportunity attack rules ([FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]PH[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT], 195), which specify that an attack of opportunity is one melee attack. That means a monster must choose a single melee attack to make, either an attack in its stat block or a generic attack, like an unarmed strike. Multiattack doesn’t qualify, not only because it’s more than one attack, but also because the rule on Multiattack ([FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]MM[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT], 11) states that this action can’t be used for opportunity attacks. An action, such as a breath weapon, that doesn’t include an attack roll is also not eligible.



[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]The [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]stinking cloud [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]spell says that a creature wastes its action on a failed save. So can it still use a move or a bonus action or a reaction? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Correct. The gas doesn’t immobilize a creature or prevent it from acting altogether, but the effect of the spell does limit what it can accomplish while the cloud lingers.



[NEW]

[FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania]Does a creature with Magic Resistance have advantage on saving throws against Channel Divinity abilities, such as Turn the Faithless? [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][FONT=Bookmania,Bookmania][/FONT][/FONT]Channel Divinity creates magical effects (as stated in both the cleric and the paladin). Magic Resistance applies.





I wish the reply on stinking cloud had been more precise - since losing action loses you your bonus action too. Movement and reactions are fine but *technically* spending your action stretching is not the same as losing your action or cannot take action so this reply means...

Inside stinking cloud with failed save, I can still use bonus action abilities and spells that are otherwise legal.

If that's the actual intent, fine, but it seems off.
 

Yunru

Banned
Banned
Generally speaking it's not said that you have taken a drink, taken a turn, taken a college course etc until you have completed whatever it is that you are taking.

Ummm... no.
I've taken a computing course for a year and a bit. I haven't finished, but I've most definitely taken the course (just not to completion).
Further more, ruling otherwise means you still have your action available until you make all the attacks. So I can take the Attack action to attack a creature. Then since I haven't taken an action yet, I can kick down a door, and attack another creature. Then, because I'm an 11th level fighter, I'm stuck at the next door because I did take an action to kick down the last one, so I use my third attack against the door. But then I can't, because that would mean I've taken two actions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

log in or register to remove this ad

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
Ummm... no.
I've taken a computing course for a year and a bit. I haven't finished, but I've most definitely taken the course (just not to completion).
Further more, ruling otherwise means you still have your action available until you make all the attacks. So I can take the Attack action to attack a creature. Then since I haven't taken an action yet, I can kick down a door, and attack another creature. Then, because I'm an 11th level fighter, I'm stuck at the next door because I did take an action to kick down the last one, so I use my third attack against the door. But then I can't, because that would mean I've taken two actions.

I think the nuance of the English Language in relation to tense alludes you.

You have been taking a computer course for a little over a year. You do that by attending the classes etc.
But, you have not taken a computer course for a little over a year. You have only taken the course once it's completed.

You could say "I've taken 12 months of a computer course" and that would be accurate as you already have completed those 12 months of the course.

For example:
Has a 2nd day Calculus student taken a calculus course because he went to class on day one? No, that's a ridiculous.
However, the 2nd day Calculus student could say "I've taken 1 day of a calculus course".

See the difference?
 

Yunru

Banned
Banned
I think the nuance of the English Language in relation to tense alludes you.

You have been taking a computer course for a little over a year. You do that by attending the classes etc.
But, you have not taken a computer course for a little over a year. You have only taken the course once it's completed.

You could say "I've taken 12 months of a computer course" and that would be accurate as you already have completed those 12 months of the course.

For example:
Has a 2nd day Calculus student taken a calculus course because he went to class on day one? No, that's a ridiculous.
However, the 2nd day Calculus student could say "I've taken 1 day of a calculus course".

See the difference?

I see you trying to argue your interpretation is the correct and only interpretation, but you're wrong.

From the dictionary:
Take: "make, undertake, or perform (an action or task)."
Undertake: "commit oneself to and begin (an enterprise or responsibility); take on."

Thus you have taken an action once you have committed yourself to it and begun it. Such as by saying "I take the Attack action."
 

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
I see you trying to argue your interpretation is the correct and only interpretation, but you're wrong.

From the dictionary:
Take: "make, undertake, or perform (an action or task)."
Undertake: "commit oneself to and begin (an enterprise or responsibility); take on."

Thus you have taken an action once you have committed yourself to it and begun it. Such as by saying "I take the Attack action."

WOW. You really believe you have taken a college course just because you signed up and paid your tuition and went to it one day?

If you really do there's no point in us discussing this further because that's such a divergent view that we aren't going to find any common ground. So if you really believe that then I'll happily let you have the last word as I see no value in debating something that should be a simple axiomatic truth.
 

Yunru

Banned
Banned
WOW. You really believe you have taken a college course just because you signed up and paid your tuition and went to it one day?

If you really do there's no point in us discussing this further because that's such a divergent view that we aren't going to find any common ground. So if you really believe that then I'll happily let you have the last word as I see no value in debating something that should be a simple axiomatic truth.

Read: I don't have a counter argument so I'm going to say wow and pretend your point is absurd?
Yes, that is exactly what I believe. Because, and this seems to be an alien concept to you, taking an action and completing an action are two different things.
 

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
[MENTION=6780961]Yunru[/MENTION]

Try whatever tactic you want to entice me back into the argument. It's not going to work. I'm done wasting my time on pointless arguments.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
Read: I don't have a counter argument so I'm going to say wow and pretend your point is absurd?
Yes, that is exactly what I believe. Because, and this seems to be an alien concept to you, taking an action and completing an action are two different things.


You see, here's the thing - you *state* what the counter argument is, right after you say he doesn't have one. So, your characterization of this is pretty bogus. It treads rather like you are trying to win, rather than to understand. How do you figure that's going to play out, hm? Is it going to end well?

How about you, and everyone else, stop treating each other badly, and accept that it is entirely possible for two entirely reasonable people come to different conclusions based on slightly different perspectives and word use.

If you are not willing to do that, please leave the thread, because you will not be capable of discussion of the topic. Argument and beating of heads together is your only option at that point, and it isn't constructive for anyone.
 

Yunru

Banned
Banned
I was genuinely asking, although I could of been more verbose about it for clarity.
An ad hominem was the only interpretation I could read, but didn't think it matched Frog's norm.
I meant no insult.
 

5ekyu

Hero
Read: I don't have a counter argument so I'm going to say wow and pretend your point is absurd?
Yes, that is exactly what I believe. Because, and this seems to be an alien concept to you, taking an action and completing an action are two different things.
Actually taking a college course by signing up, paying tuition then showing for one day brings back very bad memories.:)

"Did you take Meyers Chemistry this semester?"
"Yup"
"How is it going?"
"So far, so good."

I think there is in the common language a difference between taking a course, passing a course or even completing a course.

Of course, shield master references take not taken, right?

"If you take the Attack action on your turn,..."

So, taken is not really part of the rule.

The for attack action...

"With this action, you make one melee or ranged attack. "


But SM is not one I currently see need to fuss over.
 


Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top