[Pathfinder][OOC] Hall of the Dwarven Lord

[Theroc]

Originally Posted by Walking Dad

Are the new rules to much? We could re-start just after meeting the wizard and make the small hop to Pathfinder Rules:
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Reference Document

Well, I personally got a bit confused, I'll check pathfinders RD and see if that's a bit easier.

[Leif]

WD, I'm for making this a Pathfinder rpg game! Let's see, I think that will make this my 4th PFRPG game, so far. (Maybe 5th?)

[HolyMan]

Originally Posted by Theroc

Well, I personally got a bit confused, I'll check pathfinders RD and see if that's a bit easier.

Posts say 1,001 congrats Theroc and I to had trouble with the true20 rules I believe they wanted to be more free flowing a do whatever you like style game and the damage system would make up for all the other rules not being present I couldn't make heads or tails of it lol

Three votes pathfinder need only one more player right?

HM

[Walking Dad]

Option A:
So, vote is continuing this adventure, using Pathfinder and restarting at the meeting with the wizard/ unknown 4th player?

Does anyone want to change/ re-create his character?

Option B:
So, you like Pathfinder rules and are not afraid trying something new and sign in here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/talking...ksun-game.html

Option C:
Both A & B.

[Leif]

I've already agreed to Option C, haven't I??

[Theroc]

Mmm... was thinking of attempting option C, but I'm a bit confused with option A, as I haven't read the entire thread. Will I need to to know how to start things off?

Also, it seems Pathfinder adjusted classes and added/changed some feats. Are there any other major changes I'll need to take into account when creating a character?

[Leif]

As best I remember, Theroc, Option A is more or less a total re-start. Nothing significant happened before we got the party together, of that I am certain.

[Theroc]

Originally Posted by Leif

As best I remember, Theroc, Option A is more or less a total re-start. Nothing significant happened before we got the party together, of that I am certain.

Oh, I didn't know where the "Wizard" came in or what part he played, so I was a bit lost.

So, can anyone inform me of any significant differences between standard 3.5 and Pathfinder, besides class and feat tweaks?

[Leif]

Originally Posted by Theroc

Oh, I didn't know where the "Wizard" came in or what part he played, so I was a bit lost.

So, can anyone inform me of any significant differences between standard 3.5 and Pathfinder, besides class and feat tweaks?

The wizard that we had was just like the wizard in most adventuring parties. No mystery there.

The whole point of Pathfinder was to make it work like 3.5, but with a few of the "problems" fixed. I never was really conscious of any of these prfoblems, so I'm not even sure what they supposedly are/were. But, like a few of these deatils are that rogues have d8 hitdice, sorcerers and wizards have d6, and things like that. If anything is different, it's safe to assume that the change will favor the player.

[Theroc]

Originally Posted by Leif

The wizard that we had was just like the wizard in most adventuring parties. No mystery there.

Wizard was a PC then? I somehow had gotten the idea that the Wizard mentioned by WD was an NPC, hence all my confusion.

If not, then I'm not nearly as confused as I thought I was.

[Leif]

Yes, wizard originally was a pc, but had some posting/"disappearance-from-ENWorld" issues, if memory serves.

[Theroc]

So, basically, same as when we were looking at true20, but this time with Pathfinder rules.

So, a healer is still needed, yeah?

[HolyMan]

I'm the new Wizard remeber when they recurited me and you went on reserve? I believe WD wants to start when they group found me.

Also I will do option A, but only if I can see a stat block on a Pathfinder Gelantious Cube

And we are short a Rogue and a Cleric

HM

[HolyMan]

Hey Theroc I notice you giving the druid class a going over how about you try a Dwarven Subterraen (i know i missed that one up) Druid?

HM

[Leif]

Originally Posted by HolyMan

I'm the new Wizard remeber when they recurited me and you went on reserve? I believe WD wants to start when they group found me.
Also I will do option A, but only if I can see a stat block on a Pathfinder Gelantious Cube
And we are short a Rogue and a Cleric
HM

I thought I could give you the stat block, HM, but turns out that the critter book is the one PF book that I don't have yet. Up to the recent release of that book, PF was using 3.5 monsters, so a 3.5 G. Cube is probably a very good approximation.

I guess you guys would gang up and stone me if I wanted to change to a monk or something now, wouldn't you? (psst - I don't!)

[HolyMan]

Thanks anyway Leif I always thought G cubes were easy till I ran into one I mean an AC so low even the wizard can hit it lol

Have you checked out the new guy thread in Talking the talk think you have had your name mentioned a coupel times should stop in

HM

[Leif]

Originally Posted by HolyMan

Thanks anyway Leif I always thought G cubes were easy till I ran into one I mean an AC so low even the wizard can hit it lol

Have you checked out the new guy thread in Talking the talk think you have had your name mentioned a coupel times should stop in

HM

Whaaa? Which thread is that? They're talking about me? No way!

[Theroc]

Originally Posted by Leif

I guess you guys would gang up and stone me if I wanted to change to a monk or something now, wouldn't you? (psst - I don't!)

I like the PF class changes. Was thinking maybe a Druid/Ranger or something, but not sure.

[Leif]

Not me, man, I'm sticking Fighter, Pure Fighter, and Nothing But Fighter all the way! Bad-a** to the MAX!

[HolyMan]

Originally Posted by Leif

Whaaa? Which thread is that? They're talking about me? No way!

nothing toooo......bad think they said you was chatty lol

post counts came up and i remebered you and Rhun's post war we talked about when I first started in EnWorld

HM

edit Fighters in Pathfinder kick major G cube (hey they don't have @$$ES do they?)