View Profile: ParanoydStyle - Morrus' Unofficial Tabletop RPG News
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Friday, 21st June, 2019, 08:18 PM
    So I couldn't be at Origins this year. Very literally. I was invited there as an author guest, actually, back in March or April, but then was disinvited less than 2 weeks before the convention. I felt heartbroken and betrayed by the last minute disinvitation like anyone would. That's not what this thread's about and I'm not taking questions on it (PM me or something if you're dying to know but I...
    0 replies | 156 view(s)
    1 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Wednesday, 19th June, 2019, 09:14 PM
    Huh, that's weird. Could have sworn...hmm, well I stand corrected. Dueling fighting style is a fair bit better than I thought.
    76 replies | 3136 view(s)
    1 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Wednesday, 19th June, 2019, 09:11 AM
    (I absolutely loathe PbtA. I think my loathing for it is (perhaps excessively) well documented over the history of the internet. Nothing personal against D. Vincent Baker, Ron Edwards lassoed him to help playtest my game one time, which was surreal in a kind of wonderful way, I just think that the PbtA system is terrible and has done terrible things to the hobby. I think its legacy of "success...
    93 replies | 4452 view(s)
    1 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Tuesday, 18th June, 2019, 09:51 PM
    I'd be surprised if someone else hasn't already pointed this out three pages into the thread, but you cannot, in fact, have both of these things. Unless I'm misunderstanding the 5E rules, which is possible. (Doesn't matter much in this case, as the error appears both on the 11th level fighters and the 1st level fighters, but I think the +2 bonus to damage from dueling requires you to have your...
    76 replies | 3136 view(s)
    0 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Tuesday, 18th June, 2019, 08:58 PM
    Well first off, the same reason I'm okay with violence in videogames and on TV: because it isn't real. And that is all I'd feel the need to say if this wasn't a topic I've thought a fair bit about. To go a bit more in depth: Human beings have celebrated and glorified violence--usually but not always with a focus on courage, honor and valor--for our entire history. The need to do violence is...
    350 replies | 10604 view(s)
    2 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Tuesday, 28th May, 2019, 06:44 AM
    IANAM but I feel pretty safe saying the answer to that is yes, as long as by "here" you mean the P, P, P, DMs G & KS A forum, which you must since that's where you posted this question.
    2 replies | 197 view(s)
    0 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Tuesday, 28th May, 2019, 12:28 AM
    It is with no real regret and only mild sadness that I announce the cancellation of Project Dragonrun. Between the announcement of Shadowrun 6th Edition (which I am going to give all possible benefit of the doubt because I WANT it to be good) and my discovery of other 5th Edition Cyberpunk offerings like Dragon Turtle Games' Carbon 2185 I think that Dragonrun would almost certainly be a...
    12 replies | 663 view(s)
    0 XP
  • ParanoydStyle's Avatar
    Tuesday, 28th May, 2019, 12:22 AM
    I have nothing substantive to say, just that the very title of this thread and the most cursory glance at the original post makes me happy and reminds me why I liked to come here.
    33 replies | 1166 view(s)
    0 XP
No More Results
About ParanoydStyle

Basic Information

Date of Birth
March 18, 1986 (33)
About ParanoydStyle
Introduction:
Expert GM Seeks Victims I Mean Players
About Me:
Hello! I'm Devon. I write things, make games, and write games! I was the co-founder of End Transmission LLC which published my RPGs SPLINTER, Phantasm(2010), Psionics, the DicePunk SRD, Systems Malfunction, and more (including sourcebooks and adventures for several game lines) before the company went sadly kaput. Most or all of those products are still available on DriveThru RPG. I have also written a whole bunch of stuff for Shadowrun 4th Edition, adventures, fluff, fiction, etcetera.

So here's the rub. It is a really hard to make a living out of D&D...but the RPG industry (and the temptation was there to use scare quotes around the word industry) is the only one I have any training in. Just getting and keeping a real job might be impossible for me because of my Crohn's Disease and mental healthy issues.

So, I'm going to be making RPG content and releasing it for free. Hopefully I'll keep up a steady stream of content that people will see and like. If I can make Patreon work, that would be great. I will probably launch another Kickstarter before too long as well. If you buy my games/fiction, especially if you buy them direct from me, you help enable me to keep making things up and giving them away for free, and that is, not that I'm biased a saintly action.

Follow me on the twitters! @ParanoydStyle is my old twitter with more than 3,000 followers, @GMRichSanchez is my new twitter with less than 3 followers. I mostly get drunk and have opinions but I occasionally post random RPG gaming thoughts too.
Location:
Not In America, But Under
Disable sharing sidebar?:
No
PayPal Email:
devon.oratz@gmail.com
Sex:
Male
Age Group:
31-40
Social Networking

If you can be contacted on social networks, feel free to mention it here.

Twitter:
GMRickSanchez
My Game Details

Details of games currently playing and games being sought.

Town:
Online
Country:
USA
Game Details:
I ran out of words. I don't have a "game" right now. I do have a neat introductory flier on my GMing style for 5E that I just whipped up, but I tried to paste the text in here and it got cut off less than halfway through.

So basically, watch this space. When I have a game to tell you about in detail, I'll put that info here.
More information:
https://ko-fi.com/W7W7RKTP
My Character:
"If you must" lol.

Signature


Hey! I'm Devon! My "old" (mostly unsupported) games are available here: End Transmission Games.

As a solo act, I'm an indie novelist and my debut horror novel is called Vampires Will Never Hurt You.

My new games and my D&D 5E homebrew content are...somewhere. They're between homes right now. Last and least, I blather on about whatever crosses my mind--which is usually D&D or TTRPG related--as @GMRickSanchez on Twitter.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
202
Posts Per Day
1.32
Last Post
[Shadowrun 6E] What is the verdict? Friday, 21st June, 2019 08:18 PM

Currency

Gold Pieces
0
General Information
Last Activity
Friday, 21st June, 2019 10:40 PM
Join Date
Wednesday, 23rd January, 2019
Home Page
https://ko-fi.com/W7W7RKTP
Product Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Written
0
My Game Details
Town:
Online
Country:
USA
Game Details:
I ran out of words. I don't have a "game" right now. I do have a neat introductory flier on my GMing style for 5E that I just whipped up, but I tried to paste the text in here and it got cut off less than halfway through.

So basically, watch this space. When I have a game to tell you about in detail, I'll put that info here.
More information:
https://ko-fi.com/W7W7RKTP
My Character:
"If you must" lol.

Friday, 21st June, 2019


Thursday, 20th June, 2019


Wednesday, 19th June, 2019


Tuesday, 18th June, 2019


Monday, 17th June, 2019


Tuesday, 18th June, 2019


Tuesday, 23rd April, 2019


Monday, 8th April, 2019

  • 02:27 PM - Draegn mentioned ParanoydStyle in post Dragonrun
    ParanoydStyle The Dark Eye is a German fantasy game. Both The Dark Eye and Shadowrun were produced by FanPro when wizkids ran the show. Both use the point buy system. In my own game I have expanded the backgrounds. Backgrounds now are an improved life path system.

Thursday, 4th April, 2019

  • 06:49 PM - Celebrim mentioned ParanoydStyle in post Why the hate for complexity?
    Funny to watch the younger professionals fan boying over the older professionals, though I will second ParanoydStyle's comment and say that 3e D&D was and is my favorite RPG game system ever. D&D spells are in and of themselves what takes a D&D game from more rules medium to rules heavy (though the introduction of feats goes a long way toward that as well). By page count half of a given players guide will be spells in any edition of the game, and over the long run spells tend to cause the most bloat and the most opportunities for breaking the games balance. In 1e Haste was really good, but technically had to put up with it aging you by 2 years every time you cast it. If I had to make any criticism of the work the 3e team did, it was failing to appreciate how many spells in 1e were good, but had horrific side effects to balance them sometimes hidden away in the text of the DMG, or which were good but tactically suppressed because spells like Fireball and Lightning bolt were so over powered in 1e/2e. I think the team did an excellent job of balancing direct damage, which had been such a go to ...

Tuesday, 2nd April, 2019

  • 03:39 PM - Aldarc mentioned ParanoydStyle in post Keep On The Borderline
    My take on this is you haven't actually said a darn thing in this thread that is cogent. You are just thread crapping because you don't like that someone doesn't like a module you do like, and so you're more interested in being insulting to the participants than actually developing your own ideas.I sought to lift up a post that spoke well to what I regard as an appeal of KotB, and I did so. I then added how others have used KotB for other popular modes of play. You responded in a rant that sought to debate the merits of those terms. That is not a debate that I find particularly relevant for this thread. I doubt that ParanoydStyle was seeking for such things in this thread. But people have self-professedly used it for Sandbox or Story Now play regardless of whether you find this jargon meaningful or not. But discussing KotB seems more on-topic than debating jargon. I'm not sure I agree, simply because I've pulled modules out that have plenty of moving parts and adapted 'sandboxed' them (at least in a narrow-broad-narrow framework).Again, I believe that this is indicative of gamemastering preferences. Some have an easier time adding things. Some have an easier time altering/removing them.

No results to display...
Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Friday, 21st June, 2019


Wednesday, 19th June, 2019

  • 05:53 PM - BluejayJunior quoted ParanoydStyle in post How many 1st level Fighers can an 11th Level Fighter Kill?
    Oh, and the rule of the 11th level fighter not having any magic items does not seem reasonable for 11th level. Like, while this verges upon the talked-to-death-then-back-to-life-then-talked-to-death-again "fighters can't have nice things" debate, I feel like the game's default assumption is that an 11th level fighter would have at least a magic weapon and magic armor, and if not a magic shield, then the magic weapon or armor would most likely have an ability, plus some minor magic items you could replace with potions of healing for the sake of simplicity. (I am pretty sure the "character wealth by level" table, vague as it is in 5E, allows for an 11th level fighter to "buy" all of these things using the "magic item value" table, as ULTRA VAGUE as that is in 5E.) Somebody else already pointed out that the dueling style and a shield, do in fact stack. But I also want to point out that the default assumption for 5E is no magic items. While in play, it is likely that an 11 level fighter has some sort...
  • 04:36 PM - DMMike quoted ParanoydStyle in post Systems You'd Never Play after Reading Them
    The Truenaming rules from 3e. The concept of Truenaming is aweome, but putting several additional layers of die rolls in between you and the desired result, meant it was not going to work very often. I feel obligated to defend Truenaming since I mentioned using Tome of Magic earlier... Not sure where you're getting the "additional layers of die rolls," unless you're referring to the requirement to make a Truespeak roll, which isn't any different from a fighter making an attack roll. The tricky part about Truenaming was the DC increasing by twice your opponent's CR. As far as I could tell, that required your truenamer to be min-maxed in order to be effective against any higher-level opponents. I played a Truenamer in 3.5 once. The system is utterly broken (in a bad way) but it was still really awesome in concept. Ugh. Do we need a new thread for this? I just think that the PbtA system is terrible and has done terrible things to the hobby. I think its legacy of "success with a com...

Tuesday, 18th June, 2019

  • 10:56 PM - Azzy quoted ParanoydStyle in post How many 1st level Fighers can an 11th Level Fighter Kill?
    I'd be surprised if someone else hasn't already pointed this out three pages into the thread, but you cannot, in fact, have both of these things. Unless I'm misunderstanding the 5E rules, which is possible. (Doesn't matter much in this case, as the error appears both on the 11th level fighters and the 1st level fighters, but I think the +2 bonus to damage from dueling requires you to have your off-hand free.) No, shields are fine—you just can't use a weapon in the other hand. This was covered in Sage Advice.

Thursday, 2nd May, 2019

  • 08:19 PM - Len quoted ParanoydStyle in post I have an issue with swarms
    I have no idea how low level parties survived encounters with swarms in 3.5. Torches and lanterns.
  • 08:35 AM - schneeland quoted ParanoydStyle in post Shadowrun Sixth Edition Announced!
    ... Shadowrun 5E had completely incoherent and contradictory design goals seriously exacerbated by a major lack of any kind of strong top-down direction or vision. Competing bad ideas included grognards frothing at the mouth to undo virtually everything 4E had accomplished, turning commlinks back to cyberdecks, etcetera etcetera. Call that the 'I Miss The 80s' faction. And yes, nostalgia was their sole design strategy. Well, something that recreates the 80s cyberpunk feeling would have been quite attractive to me, but if that was the goal for SR 5e, it was well-buried within that massive rules tome. I played a lot of Shadowrun until the end of 2nd edition and had planned to come back with 5th., but I didn't even start playing because all my motivation died away while reading the rules Probably the single strongest influence over the design of 5E was a man who unironically believed that it was not a priority for games to be fun. So I guess we can say the design succeeded here.
  • 02:49 AM - Retreater quoted ParanoydStyle in post Shadowrun Sixth Edition Announced!
    How and why would this stop you? Shadowrun and Shadowrun: Anarchy are designed to scratch two very different itches. The former is a very crunchy simulationist tactical RPG. The latter is a Story First storygame. I don't see how one precludes the other. I was mistakenly under the impression that Shadowrun 6e would take over Anarchy's spot, as I thought the point of Anarchy was a "rules lite" version of 5e. That's how it was sold to me at GenCon at the Catalyst booth. And the way it was run for us when we played it at Origins. We didn't do any of the "shifting narration" or "getting complication points" stuff that's present in many of these storygames. (I just don't understand the concept of that, anyway.)

Wednesday, 1st May, 2019

  • 11:55 PM - Staffan quoted ParanoydStyle in post Shadowrun Sixth Edition Announced!
    I don't know what Genesys is, but nonetheless ding!ding!ding! we got a winner! You're absolutely right. Genesys is the generified (shut up spellcheck, that is a perfectly cromulent word) version of the system used in FFG's Star Wars RPGs. If Numenera was Star Wars, Genesys would be the Cypher System.
  • 11:46 PM - Abstruse quoted ParanoydStyle in post Shadowrun Sixth Edition Announced!
    9) "The action economy and initiative system are getting an overhaul to speed combat, reduce analysis paralysis, and to prevent faster characters from dominating every combat encounter." As written, this SOUNDS AWESOME. I just desperately hope it doesn't MEAN "we're switching over to a hard limit of one action per character per turn because that's how D&D5E does it and have you seen how much money they're making!?!?". I haven't seen the full system yet (I've got a review copy coming my way soon where I'll do a full breakdown), but the way it sounds is they're switching to a fixed initiative system like D&D's where you roll once at the start of combat then just go around like that. However, you will be able to move around that initiative order in various ways (spending Edge, use of gear/cyberware/spells, stuff like that). They've also streamlined actions down to two categories, Major and Minor (previously it was Complex, Simple, Free, and Movement I believe). You get one Major and two Minor actions ...
  • 12:35 AM - Bacon Bits quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    Generally, the buzz I've heard from players at my FLGS is that the Ranger is just ridiculously awful, period. It's not that bad. If you know how the class works, Hunter is extremely potent. The level 3 and level 11 abilities are all good. Particularly when you go ranged, and doubly so when Feats aren't available. With Feats, Fighters are able to keep up a little too well. The class itself has got four core problems: 1. Favored Terrain and Favored Enemy are the primary, defining abilities of the entire class, and they don't do anything. In the overwhelming majority of encounters and overland travel in the campaigns I've played in, they're functionally non-existent abilities. The DM often has to go out of their way to make them do something. Their benefit is that they eliminate penalties that usually get hand-waived away (Favored Terrain) or they grant benefits for rolls you essentially never need to know or for which you have to succeed (Favored Enemy, knowledge and tracking, respectively). ...
  • 12:18 AM - TwoSix quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    I was not completely honest and accurate in how I framed the question, I suppose. What I really meant to ask was "Does the D&D5E ENGINE require Sub-Classes to work or can it get by on just classes?" All the engine really requires to be playable are the 6 stats, the number of Hit Die/Hit Points, and a list of things the character is proficient with. Everything else is really just codifying progression, power levels, and setting flavor. They could have just as easily written every subclass as its own class, or combined classes into a core 4, or just had one "class" with a menu of feat options. Outside of theoretical constructions, though, the established 5e ecosystem is for class design that has room for at least 3 subclasses with distinct options for at least 4 different levels.

Tuesday, 30th April, 2019

  • 02:12 AM - Mike Myler quoted ParanoydStyle in post Mythological Figures: Saint George (5E)
    Um, actually that sounds quite a lot like how I handle divine magic in D&D. Generally speaking, Clerics and characters proficient in Arcana and/or Religion describe clerical spells as miracles, and never use the word "spells" to describe them. In 3.5 I had Elistan (D&D Joseph Smith) of Dragonlance fame experience a crisis of faith because he did not have a 5th level spell slot prepared to cast raise dead on an important character. He felt like Paladine had abandoned him: to me, this was a logical consequence of the character not knowing that he's a character in a game, let alone its rules. But...I...digress... St. Peter not having Dragon as a favored enemy just seems WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. St. Peter and the nameless Dragon (generally considered to be Satan) are both very interesting mythic figures for what they represent, and only become more interesting in a D&D context as Saints exist outside of monotheism and Dragons are more complicated and more nuanced than mere vessels of Satan. I've never no...
  • 12:14 AM - ad_hoc quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    Again, though...that may be how the "game" is designed but I think I just explained I was talking more about the ENGINE than the game. I don't see the difference. This question is nonsensical to me.

Monday, 29th April, 2019

  • 11:43 PM - pemerton quoted ParanoydStyle in post God Games (NOT D&D)
    It's a mode of a game about being murder-hobos where it happens that you hobo-murdered your way into becoming a god.That's not a very good description of the 4e game I was talking about.
  • 11:19 PM - Tony Vargas quoted ParanoydStyle in post God Games (NOT D&D)
    Hey, you guys ever play any RPGs where you play as a god or demigod or some kind of autonomous divine entity? (The angels in In Nomine would not count.) I was going to say no, but now that you mention it, I was in an odd Hero System game back in the day, where we were dark takes on divine archetypes. The ones I remember were: 'I' - a nigh-omnipotent alien thought-entity that accidently annihilates all life on earth, so re-creates it; a rogue angel that nurtured and hyper-evolved a surviving patch of slime pre-dating said annihilation into some Deep-One-like sentient carnivores; and a conceptual divinity that started as a harvest goddess and eventually became Death. I think there was a succubus and vampire in there, too, for some reason, and maybe an analog to Prometheus?
  • 10:49 PM - ad_hoc quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    What I really meant to ask was "Does the D&D5E ENGINE require Sub-Classes to work or can it get by on just classes?" This is how the game is designed. The real question here is whether a new class is warranted. The game is designed to allow for new subclasses, but the room for new classes is extremely limited. Generally, the buzz I've heard from players at my FLGS is that the Ranger is just ridiculously awful, period. Group think is a thing. While the Ranger is the least liked class, the majority of 5e players still like it just fine. Something has to be least popular, that doesn't mean it is bad.

Saturday, 27th April, 2019

  • 05:49 AM - Elfcrusher quoted ParanoydStyle in post [5E] Apparatus of Kwalish
    But the Apparatus of Kwalish is a "car" about as much as you are a rooster. Where I come from, if you go around calling a man a cock, you'd better be prepared to step outside.

Wednesday, 24th April, 2019

  • 12:43 AM - the Jester quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    ANYWAY: it strikes me that the more classes become available, the LESS NECESSARY sub-classes become, as the point of sub-classes was to allow for ample character differentiation in a game with relatively few classes. Thus: poll. Just because some guy on the Internet publishes a class doesn't mean I'm letting it into my game. In my opinion, to justify adding a full class, it has to have a strong, coherent identity that can't be properly created with existing options. It has to be a big concept, too- big enough to contain subclasses. If it isn't, it's better designed as a feat or subclass. Not every concept deserves or needs a full class.

Tuesday, 23rd April, 2019

  • 08:22 PM - Tony Vargas quoted ParanoydStyle in post Do classes built for the 5E D&D *ENGINE* NEED sub-classes?
    ANYWAY: it strikes me that the more classes become available, the LESS NECESSARY sub-classes become, as the point of sub-classes was to allow for ample character differentiation in a game with relatively few classes. Thus: poll.Sub-classes make up for 5e's relative (to 3e & 4e, which is maybe not that fair a comparison) lack of player-side options, especially if the DM isn't using any optional rules. Heck, without optional MC rules, sub-classes backfill classic D&D character types like the elf fighter/magic-user (Eldritch Knight or Bladesinger). A sub-class is a package-concept that gets close to what you might have done with feats, multi-classing, PrCs, backgrounds, themes, PP/EDs, hybrids, gestalts, or whatevertheheckelse was (and still is, thanks PF) available at the height of D&D's player entitlement phase. The more you homebrew & 3pp in player side options, the less the few-sizes-fit-enough model of the sub-class matters. You can't get rid of it, per se, because it's integral to the 5e ...
  • 04:41 PM - Umbran quoted ParanoydStyle in post God Games (NOT D&D)
    Hey, you guys ever play any RPGs where you play as a god or demigod or some kind of autonomous divine entity? (The angels in In Nomine would not count.) Which are your favorite TTRPG "god games" and why? Tell me a little bit about them. Nobilis is a game in which you play the the personification of a concept/aspect of reality. You may be the Noble of Time, for example. Or Doors. Or Christmas. Within your sphere, your power is great, outside it... not so much. I think Wikipedia does a better job than I could at giving an overview of the system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobilis


Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

ParanoydStyle's Downloads

  Filename Total Downloads Rating Files Uploaded Last Updated

Most Recent Favorite Generators/Tables

View All Favorites