Konrad Zielinski
First Post
The weapons table on page 76 of OLD appears to have the statistics for Scythes and Sickles around the wrong way. As it lists sickle as being Large and doing more damage then a Scythe.
WOIN Official Errata Thread
David Applegate
Explorer
Starship Construction Manual
P15 Note SPEED as total power from sub-luminal engines dived by the ship’s hull class.
Divided
---
p56 Talon has Training Hall (4), but not stats in facilities.
P15 Note SPEED as total power from sub-luminal engines dived by the ship’s hull class.
Divided
---
p56 Talon has Training Hall (4), but not stats in facilities.
ProudPotato
First Post
N.E.W
1. When i take a career, can i take the same skill twice? What about species-related skills?
2. Suppose i take the academy's "basic training" exploit, which grants skills at rank one. If, as part of the same career progression, i take an academy skill that's included in basic training, do i have it at level 2?
1. When i take a career, can i take the same skill twice? What about species-related skills?
2. Suppose i take the academy's "basic training" exploit, which grants skills at rank one. If, as part of the same career progression, i take an academy skill that's included in basic training, do i have it at level 2?
You're correct. That should be REP +1.
Nope, you have to take two skills.
No. That exploit ensures you have a certain level of proficiency, but it doesn't increase it higher.
raspberryfh
First Post
The N.E.W. book gives helmets a tech level of 9A. Was this intentional, since we have helmets in the modern era that provide reasonable protection against injury (and helmets have been around for a long time).
The Prodigy origin only grants 3 attributes instead of 4. The exploit seems powerful, but not so much better than other origin exploits as to justify a handicap in attributes. For my campaign, I added +1 Rep to it as well, but I'm curious if this was intentional for a reason I've missed?
The Prodigy origin only grants 3 attributes instead of 4. The exploit seems powerful, but not so much better than other origin exploits as to justify a handicap in attributes. For my campaign, I added +1 Rep to it as well, but I'm curious if this was intentional for a reason I've missed?
Ah, it became Diplomat.
REP +1 is correct. Going in errata.
Similar Threads
