L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
Before we continue, I want to make sure I understand the nature of your post. I was being completely sincere when I said "I know you intend well", which was based on my extremely limited exposure to your posts in the Survival threads, which seemed to be lighthearted and friendly.*As a side note, I should inform you that I, in particular, do not enjoy posts that use "straw man," "ad hominem," "appeal to authority (ad verecundiam)" and other references to logical fallacies, either formal or informal, because when this is done, it is almost always done incorrectly. Usually, the person doing so has, at best, a shallow understanding of "internet argumentation," and perhaps a recall of Logic 101 in undergraduate. Moreover, it usually means that the person is more interested in arguing about arguing than a substantive discussion. Other's opinions might vary- but that is mine.
lowkey13 said:Again, how a table runs is its own business. But I wouldn't want to play at that table. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But imagine you are a particular player that enjoys overcoming challenges. Let's say that, to use an example, you wanted to beat someone at chess. And then you beat him. Great! But if you learn that the player let you win ... not so great. The challenge was illusory. There was no thrill in victory, because the outcome was pre-ordained.