I Do Declare! Do you? (POLL) - Page 5

Poll: Does your table use a declaration phase?

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 49 of 49
  1. #41
    Member
    Novice (Lvl 1)



    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Lost in Anauroch
    Posts
    50
    Not necessarily, it's just different ways of playing the game.

    I just like the "snapshot in time" every round, everyone declares at that moment what their intention is, poof resume action, time freezes again, everyone declares, etc etc. In my experience it allows me (as a DM) to describe the round as a whole.

    The other way of seeing it is considering that everything happens sequentially, and you do descriptions in between each PC / Monster decision. I don't think there's anything wrong with either.

  2. #42
    Member
    Greater Elemental (Lvl 23)

    TarionzCousin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    5,884
    @Morrus Is this the most lopsided poll in the history of ENWorld?

  3. #43
    Member
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)



    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    3,967
    Did wind up voting for "used to but not now" cuz we have played systems with declare and resolve as separate stages.

  4. #44
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,023
    The general assumption with cyclical initiative is that everything is taking place at about the same time. We just represent it sequentially for ease of play. Nobody actually thinks it means everyone is waiting around for their turn. However, it is true that it isnt really easy to imagine things happening simultaneously. Mostly you dont think about it. I think declaration stages can reduce that issue, but honestly its only a matter of degreethe game still stops for everyone to resolve their actions individually.

  5. #45
    Member SILVER SUBSCRIBER
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    ParanoydStyle's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Not In America, But Under
    Posts
    202
    Should have an "only in Shadowrun" option, since I think that is the only game where I have used "declare actions in reverse initiative order then resolve actions in initiative order as declared" and I'm sure it's the only game I've played that asked me to.
    Last edited by ParanoydStyle; Friday, 22nd March, 2019 at 03:42 AM.

  6. #46
    Member
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)



    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    3,967
    Quote Originally Posted by Sword of Spirit View Post
    The general assumption with cyclical initiative is that everything is taking place at about the same time. We just represent it sequentially for ease of play. Nobody actually thinks it means everyone is waiting around for their turn. However, it is true that it isnt really easy to imagine things happening simultaneously. Mostly you dont think about it. I think declaration stages can reduce that issue, but honestly its only a matter of degreethe game still stops for everyone to resolve their actions individually.
    Actually, most of the gsmes i played in had a different set of assumptions.

    Rather than "all simultaneous" or the notion of "standing around" the assumption is that characters are always active, doing stuff, ducking, looking, etc - looking for the opening to get time to do what you need. .

    The "initiative order" is simply when your opening occurs.

    Thats sort of why you get AO, the enemy is exposing themselves, letting a shot thru that they would have avoided otherwise. So, there are plenty of swings, partial casts, etc that are off-camera all the time but the opening comes (is forced) and you take your shot.

    This assumption then avoids the conflict between a model of simultaneous vs sequential since it supports sequential all the way.

    For some, the "clock" of "six seconds" might seem tight but if so just assume 12 seconds and adjust the perception. Or just accept things happen fast in a world of magic and dragons.

  7. #47
    Member
    Greater Elemental (Lvl 23)

    Blue's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cedar Grove, NJ 07009
    Posts
    4,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenstone.Walker View Post
    I like declaration but my current players hate it. The thought of somehow losing an action is apparantly the most henious thing that can ever happen at the table, at least according to the reaction I got from them when we tried a couple of alternatives.
    When you get one action every 15-20 minutes because of the speed of combat, then losing an action is the most heinous thing. It's long stretches of boredom, which is the most critical lose condition of any game.

  8. #48
    Member
    Guide (Lvl 11)



    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue View Post
    When you get one action every 15-20 minutes because of the speed of combat, then losing an action is the most heinous thing. It's long stretches of boredom, which is the most critical lose condition of any game.
    Having seen some people post about losing actions because of the situation changed after declarations, I have to say that over 25 years of playing D&D using declarations this has never happened in any group I have played it--EVER.

    I suppose it depends on how rigid and detailed your declarations have to be and the table you are at...

  9. #49
    Member
    Greater Elemental (Lvl 23)

    Blue's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cedar Grove, NJ 07009
    Posts
    4,868
    Quote Originally Posted by dnd4vr View Post
    Having seen some people post about losing actions because of the situation changed after declarations, I have to say that over 25 years of playing D&D using declarations this has never happened in any group I have played it--EVER.

    I suppose it depends on how rigid and detailed your declarations have to be and the table you are at...
    Agreed to a point. Even something generic like "I'm going to move and attack a goblin" can be pretty loose when there's lots of goblins, but restraining when there is only one and monsters of other types. Yet once you get to the non-rigidness of "I'm going to move if needed and attack a foe", you've diluted it down to the point that there is little reason to declare.

    Back in AD&D when we declared I have seen characters lose actions. Enough that I played more ranged characters (archers or casters) who were less likely to do so until the DM house ruled re-purposing missed actions at the end of initiative.

    But I do agree with your basic intent - if you are going to be declaring, allow and encourage general instead of highly specific declarations to avoid lost actions which lead to having players bored for long stretches of time.
    Last edited by Blue; Friday, 22nd March, 2019 at 04:18 PM.
    XP dnd4vr gave XP for this post

Similar Threads

  1. When to declare immediate actions?
    By JesperKT in forum *Pathfinder & Starfinder
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Friday, 1st May, 2009, 02:30 PM
  2. DMs, How Often Do You Declare Circumstance Bonuses/Penalties?
    By el-remmen in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Wednesday, 27th September, 2006, 01:27 AM
  3. [OT] I hereby declare it to be BBQ season!
    By Piratecat in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: Monday, 14th April, 2003, 02:13 AM
  4. Declare a Race and Class, then Roll!
    By jester47 in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: Tuesday, 18th March, 2003, 05:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •