Favourite D&D edition that’s not 5E

Favourite D&D Edition

  • OD&D

    Votes: 18 6.1%
  • AD&D 1E

    Votes: 42 14.3%
  • AD&D 2E

    Votes: 72 24.6%
  • D&D 3E/3.5

    Votes: 79 27.0%
  • D&D 4E

    Votes: 73 24.9%
  • Other (not 5E)

    Votes: 9 3.1%

I

Immortal Sun

Guest
4e was much better received than popular opinion might lead one to believe. In fact, it was very successful with new players, its problem was that it didn’t appeal to established players, who were very much necessary to bring in new players at the time.

True, perhaps once "new players" become a more established group we'll see a 4E revival.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
True, perhaps once "new players" become a more established group we'll see a 4E revival.

Sadly, the lack of established players bringing new players into 4e severely bottlenecked the edition’s growth. There’s definitely a market out there for an updated 4e clone, but it’s a niche one.
 

I

Immortal Sun

Guest
Sadly, the lack of established players bringing new players into 4e severely bottlenecked the edition’s growth. There’s definitely a market out there for an updated 4e clone, but it’s a niche one.

I always try to offer to run 4E for folks, but always get dirty looks when I do.
 


Raith5

Adventurer
While I played a lot of 1e and 2e, I think 4e is a my favorite edition. It wasnt perfect and I understand why many people did not roll with it, but I really appreciated the new take on D&D and was ready for something different when it came out. I really liked the variety and unpredictability of the monsters, the way that martial characters worked and the tactical options in combat.
 

MerricB

Eternal Optimist
Supporter
I went with AD&D (1st edition). There's a certain purity in the concepts of the game back then, and it's had enough time for some of the oddness of Original D&D to disappear. Yes, it's got lots of things that are still odd about it, but we ignored most of those when playing it.

2E did a lot of interesting things with the game, but I felt that, mechanically, it lost something, even while making things more consistent. For one, I don't like how 2E deals with specialist wizards - the original illusionist was far more to my taste.

I've run a fair deal of original D&D of late, but I think that if I was planning to do another long-form non-5E campaign, I'd run AD&D again.

Cheers!
 


Shiroiken

Legend
Interesting how close everything is from 1E to 4E. I'm a bit surprised that OD&D doesn't have more, since it includes BECMI, which had a solid following through most of AD&D.

For me, it's 1E if only one can be chosen. Like many, we played 1.5 edition, which was a mishmash of both editions, taking the best of both. While both 3E and 4E revolutionized the game, I was never quite comfortable with their "crunchiness." I obviously believe that 5E really is the best edition, because it kept the style/flow of AD&D and installed just the best crunch from 3E and 4E.
 

S'mon

Legend
Went with 1e as the definitive edition. For actual play I prefer Swords & Wizardry, an ODnD clone.

Interesting how different these results are from what is recorded as being played out in the wild, where BX clones are popular and 2e and 4e are unloved.
 
Last edited:


Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top