If you could put D&D into any other non middle ages genre, what would it be? - Page 10
Page 10 of 45 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617181920 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 449
  1. #91
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    Now you're contorting yourselves just for the sake of argument.

    Any "one hit kill" reality, where a gun doing 10% of your hit points is "mockery", is one where you need to look elsewhere than D&D. Yes, it really is that simple.
    The point is, hp are stupid irrespective of if you are fighting with a gun or a hat pin. What matters is where the hit happens, not the nature of the weapon.

    People of have gotten used to the idea of hp with traditional D&D weapons through playing D&D and knock-off video games, but that doesn't make it any less unrealistic than using hp for firearms or sci fi weapons.
    XP Oofta, 77IM gave XP for this post

  2. #92
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,180
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    You can't seriously expect people to abandon their genre expectations.

    Plus, for every person you show survived dozens of bullets, I'll show you dozens of people who were killed or out after just one.

    Try justifying that by explaining who's level one and who's level twelve...
    Most people are level 1 commoners with 4 HP. How many hits with any D&D weapon do you expect them to survive? As far as who's level 12, well obviously they're the protagonists of an action movie that have Hollywood magical plot armor. Or you justify it exactly the same way you justify getting hit in the face with a club by an hill giant a dozen times and walking away. You don't.

    Any system that uses HP is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make a lot of sense if you think about it. I don't care if it's D&D or the vast majority of video games I've ever played. But how many times in action movies or TV do the heroes get shot but it's "just a flesh wound" that they bandage up and ignore 5 minute later.
    XP ardoughter gave XP for this post

  3. #93
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    2,076
    Good examples of movies with guns where the heroes clearly have a ridiculous number of hp are the Indiana Jones and Die Hard movies.
    XP MarkB, 77IM gave XP for this post

  4. #94
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Farquhar View Post
    The point is, hp are stupid irrespective of if you are fighting with a gun or a hat pin. What matters is where the hit happens, not the nature of the weapon.

    People of have gotten used to the idea of hp with traditional D&D weapons through playing D&D and knock-off video games, but that doesn't make it any less unrealistic than using hp for firearms or sci fi weapons.
    I could list a dozen video games off the top of my head (hmm...do individual games in a series count?) set in current or sci-fi settings that use HP where you're perfectly fine until you hit zero and then die. It's a really, really common trope of fiction no matter what weapons are used.
    XP 77IM gave XP for this post

  5. #95
    Member
    Spellbinder (Lvl 16)



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Corellia (Space-Texas)
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Farquhar View Post
    Good examples of movies with guns where the heroes clearly have a ridiculous number of hp are the Indiana Jones and Die Hard movies.
    I hear today's actors receive a script and a character sheet for their roles, which tells them their level, abilities, and of course, how many hit points they have at the start of a scene.

    Also, some directors stopped yelling "action!" or "cut!". Now they call for initiative and saving throws.
    Laugh 77IM laughed with this post

  6. #96
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Old Bridge, NJ
    Posts
    2,330
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    Now you're contorting yourselves just for the sake of argument.

    Any "one hit kill" reality, where a gun doing 10% of your hit points is "mockery", is one where you need to look elsewhere than D&D. Yes, it really is that simple.
    I think you're conflating gritty with Western. Yes, many Westerns are gritty, but you can have all varieties of Western. Blazing Saddles is a comedic Western, for example. Admittedly, I can't really point out a good example of a heroic Western, as I haven't watched a great many Westerns. Trigun could arguably suffice. It's been a long time since I watched it, but maybe Maverick?

    While 5e can be modified to be grittier than its default, it isn't the grittiest game out there. However, as long as you're running a heroic Western, D&D is fine. I played in a Western themed D&D game (I admit guns did not exist, but if they had I'm certain it wouldn't have changed a thing) and it was a blast!

    Perhaps gritty is the default assumed tone for a Western, but my point is that as long as one establishes that that's not the intended tone of the campaign, there's no issue.

  7. #97
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    2,076
    There where a whole bunch of heroic Western serials made for TV in the 50s, and for cinema serials before TV. See anything staring Alan Ladd for example.

    The Lone Ranger is best remembered, and most recently remade badly.
    XP Fanaelialae gave XP for this post

  8. #98
    Member
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)



    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    444
    To call D&D or any game that uses HP "fundamentally flawed" is to expose a certain level of ignorance about game design and furthermore to impose personal taste on the public in the guise of critique. HPs do what they do, and reflect the nature of combat and damage exactly as the designers intended them to. If you personally don't like it, great, don't play. But don't pretend that your tastes in different damage systems somehow have a monopoly on what is 'correct' for RPGs generally.

  9. #99
    Member
    Pit Fiend (Lvl 26)



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Aloha, or
    Posts
    5,715
    Oh joy. I am gone for the weekend and come back to see my thread has turned into the same discussion about reality of bullet wounds vs melee weapons. Nice to see some people still trotting out the double standard no matter how many times in other threads it's pointed out how it's a double standard. And the same old myths keep getting repeated as well.

    The idea that gunshots are exponentially more fatal than something like a sword or axe is a myth. People have this weird idea (I don't know why, maybe from movies where good guys take out all the bad guys with one shot and they immediately die) that a single gun shot should be fatal in most cases, and dismiss the game part of the equation because "reality". Well, the reality is that a single gun shot is rarely fatal. Even multiple gun shot wound victims don't have a fatality rate all that high. A recent study by the Boston PD over a 4 year period has the numbers as 27% of single gun shot victims died, and 65% of multiple gunshot victims died. In game terms, these are commoners, not PCs or heroes.

    I did medivac for a bit when I was a Black Hawk crewchief in the Army, and we have something called the "golden hour". That means if we get the victim to a hospital within an hour, the chances of them surviving goes way up. If you have access to near instant magical healing in a game, the survival rate would be almost 100%. So this idea that guns need to be extremely lethal to be realistic is just wrong. It would make them less realistic by doing so.

    Additionally, PCs are supposed to be representative of the heroes and the exceptional small % of the population. In real life, the equivalent would be people like Blackbeard, Rasputin, Audie Murphy, Simo Hyh, Fazal Din, Lachhiman Gurung, Carton de Wiart, and about a thousand others. People who took severe punishment and kept on fighting.

    So can we please, please stop with this "guns need to be way more lethal than swords or it's not realistic" nonsense? The mechanics of D&D are just fine for emulating a heroic wild west genre. To argue otherwise is to hold a double standard of lethality for swords vs guns, and to ironically ignore what you're claiming you need to have: reality
    XP Oofta, Fanaelialae, MarkB, Saelorn, 77IM gave XP for this post

  10. #100
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenris-77 View Post
    To call D&D or any game that uses HP "fundamentally flawed" is to expose a certain level of ignorance about game design and furthermore to impose personal taste on the public in the guise of critique. HPs do what they do, and reflect the nature of combat and damage exactly as the designers intended them to. If you personally don't like it, great, don't play. But don't pretend that your tastes in different damage systems somehow have a monopoly on what is 'correct' for RPGs generally.

    Instead of "fundamentally flawed" how about "fundamentally over-simplifies damage" or "fundamentally unrealistic". I'm perfectly okay with HP in whatever game I'm playing as long as it's appropriate. Games have to make all sorts of compromises for the sake of fun and ease of play.
    XP Paul Farquhar gave XP for this post

Similar Threads

  1. D&D in the Middle Ages?
    By Darth Shoju in forum *Varied Geek Talk & Media Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, 28th November, 2005, 02:41 PM
  2. Government Types in the Middle Ages?
    By NewJeffCT in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: Thursday, 5th February, 2004, 10:00 PM
  3. disease in the middle ages
    By alsih2o in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, 17th March, 2003, 01:47 AM
  4. Bar games of the middle ages...
    By Arravis in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Friday, 12th April, 2002, 03:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •