If you could put D&D into any other non middle ages genre, what would it be? - Page 33
Page 33 of 45 FirstFirst ... 232425262728293031323334353637383940414243 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 449
  1. #321
    Member
    Hydra (Lvl 25)



    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12,963
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    @CapnZapp I still feel that your argument that D&D favours moving to close in to melee rather than using cover feels more like theory crafting than actual gameplay practice. But even conceding that it might occur in standard D&D, I still don't see that it will be a factor in a Western setting.

    In a Western setting, ranged combat is king. Your primary damage dealers are pistols and rifles and shotguns, with things like knives and tomahawks coming in second and also being throwable.

    So, in this setting, where's the motivation to charge into melee? What purpose is there in a character running around in the open? Sure, the HP model may somewhat mitigate the downside of such a tactic, but what's the upside? Why wouldn't people make tactical use of range and cover in those circumstances?
    I'm afraid you need to go into specifics.

    As long as we just take "ranged combat is king" for granted, sure enough, there's little motivation to charge into melee.

    But how to accomplish the change?

    I'm sure you agree D&D as written is very much a game with prolific motivation to charge into melee. Something needs to change. And that something is crucial to giving an answer.

  2. #322
    Member
    A 1e title so awesome it's not in the book (Lvl 21)

    MarkB's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,816
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    I'm afraid you need to go into specifics.

    As long as we just take "ranged combat is king" for granted, sure enough, there's little motivation to charge into melee.

    But how to accomplish the change?

    I'm sure you agree D&D as written is very much a game with prolific motivation to charge into melee. Something needs to change. And that something is crucial to giving an answer.
    Well, to me, that something is the change from "guys in plate armour with huge axes fighting big monsters" to "guys in shirts with pistols fighting other guys in shirts with pistols", but clearly your mileage may vary.
    Laugh Jer laughed with this post

  3. #323
    Member
    Guide (Lvl 11)



    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Farquhar View Post
    Star Wars is a prime example of the being no one correct approach. Edge of Empire and Star Wars D20 used hp, Star Wars D6 did not.
    And the d20 versions of Star Wars are very much D&D with guns... in space. It works fine for me and my group.

    In the session that I ran last week, the party got set upon by a troop transport full of soldiers. The cleric healing/medicine focused jedi got shot eight times in the first round of combat. No one was complaining about the realism. They were mostly worried about not letting their cleric medic get killed.
    XP Satyrn, Matthia05718273 gave XP for this post

  4. #324
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,166
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    This is a straw man. You don't need D&D or hit points to run reasonably fast paced combat. Nobody has called for an "overly realistic simulation".

    The difference is instead the hit points itself. The presence of absence of a "backpack shield generator" informs how your characters act during play.

    Neither is bad. But disregarding criticism against one as merely a call to "modeling real combat" is.


    You've said basically "it won't work because any single shot should kill you". It's been pointed out time and again that the same could be said of any weapon that does damage. You've never been able to clearly state why a gun should be handled differently. Well, other than "because I said so".

    On the other hand when you come up with some specific house rules for how you would handle it, feel free to start a different thread. Don't think it will ever work and we should use a different system? Then why you shouldn't be posting to a D&D board.

  5. #325
    Member
    Titan (Lvl 27)



    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    San Jose/Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    15,166
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    My point is that any movement not modeled by D&D is "ducking and weaving" even if it means backing up a staircase and then climbing back up.
    And how that isn't relevant. Since it isn't modeled.
    You mean it isn't mapped to an actual move action. It's modeled in attack rolls, however. It doesn't take six seconds to swing a sword once - let alone the full minute of a 1e combat round - there's a lot of attacking, parrying, dodging, "ducking & weaving" if you like, and movement in the course of the round.

    5e lets you attack within a move action, so you can model moving-and-fighting a little more closely than in the classic game, which just assumed that any 'melee' was a mass of fighting individuals moving around and you couldn't even take aim at one of them in particular.

    And, yes, all that is a big fat abstraction. Melee characters aren't /really/ meant to be interpreted literally as figures that stand perfectly still in base-to-base contact and trade thwacking great blows at six second intervals.

    What is relevant is the player's choice; how to move his or her character across the battle map.
    I'm claiming that the damage model impacts the player's decisions for movement.
    Certainly the melee system in some editions has led to decisions that resulted in 'static' melees where everyone tried to move no more than 5' per six-second round so as to get in their full attacks. While that was criticized, it was hardly grounds for claiming that D&D couldn't handle melee, and could be defended with visualization of more 'realistic' (if you needed realism) or 'dramatic' (if you wanted genre fidelity) movement that just netted out to that 5'/round nudging about.

  6. #326
    Quote Originally Posted by Oofta View Post
    You've said basically "it won't work because any single shot should kill you". It's been pointed out time and again that the same could be said of any weapon that does damage. You've never been able to clearly state why a gun should be handled differently. Well, other than "because I said so".

    On the other hand when you come up with some specific house rules for how you would handle it, feel free to start a different thread. Don't think it will ever work and we should use a different system? Then why you shouldn't be posting to a D&D board.
    The entire point of guns is to kill someone before he comes close. In a D&D/HP system that is simply not possible. You can set up any amount of level appropriate ranged combatants and barring environmental obstacles like cliffs you will never be able to kill someone before he can punch you in the face.
    That changes the usage of guns completely compared to real life.

    Melee weapons on the other hand still work like they are supposed to. You get close and you kill the enemy, it only takes longer. The only problem is with 1 hit stealth kills, but that is a separate issue and ranged weapons suffer from it, too.
    XP Lanefan gave XP for this post

  7. #327
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Sacrosanct View Post
    This thread is about what other genres would you like to apply D&D mechanics to.

    I have toyed with the idea of a weird west campaign, which is why I wanted to discuss some implementation specifics. All of that has been derailed of course by "guns and D&D don't mix".

    I think you could also do something like Team Fortress or Halo with either pseudo-modern or futuristic combat. It's really not that far off from D&D with it's classes and archetypes. Plate becomes advanced armor, combine it with a girdle of strength for a mech suit. Use strength for heavy gun's attack bonuses because you have to control the recoil. Dex based classes don't need a lot of modification. Maybe give people some variant of light sabers. Replace gold with the ubiquitous "credits" of course.

    But I already borrow a lot from other genres in my current games that don't need any adjustment. Horror, lost jungle kingdoms, borderline steam punk ... all have fit in at one point or other.
    XP Sacrosanct, Satyrn gave XP for this post

  8. #328
    Member
    Grandmaster of Flowers (Lvl 18)



    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    2,067
    Quote Originally Posted by CapnZapp View Post
    This is a straw man. You don't need D&D or hit points to run reasonably fast paced combat. Nobody has called for an "overly realistic simulation".

    I think the main strength of 5e rules is it's ability to resolve combat quickly and with a minimum of fuss.

    I have played games with cover and action points and they are sloooooooow. Like set aside a whole Sunday for a single fight and don't expect to get home before midnight.

  9. #329
    Member
    Time Agent (Lvl 24)



    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    4,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Derren View Post
    The entire point of guns is to kill someone before he comes close. In a D&D/HP system that is simply not possible. You can set up any amount of level appropriate ranged combatants and barring environmental obstacles like cliffs you will never be able to kill someone before he can punch you in the face.
    That changes the usage of guns completely compared to real life.

    Melee weapons on the other hand still work like they are supposed to. You get close and you kill the enemy, it only takes longer. The only problem is with 1 hit stealth kills, but that is a separate issue and ranged weapons suffer from it, too.
    Really? There's no other weapon in the PHB who's purpose is to kill the enemy before they get up close? Have you never played with someone who has archery style and sharp shooter?

  10. #330
    Member
    Titan (Lvl 27)



    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    San Jose/Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    15,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Oofta View Post
    Really? There's no other weapon in the PHB who's purpose is to kill the enemy before they get up close? Have you never played with someone who has archery style and sharp shooter?
    I'm not sure which is more out there, the denial that ranged weapons can & do kill in D&D (ask any number of imaginary orcs with imaginary elven arrows sticking out of them - the death toll over the last 45 years must have been staggering), or the denial that people /do/ close with gunmen in spite of being shot at, or even actually hit several times?
    XP Sacrosanct, Fanaelialae, MarkB gave XP for this post

Similar Threads

  1. D&D in the Middle Ages?
    By Darth Shoju in forum *Varied Geek Talk & Media Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, 28th November, 2005, 02:41 PM
  2. Government Types in the Middle Ages?
    By NewJeffCT in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: Thursday, 5th February, 2004, 10:00 PM
  3. disease in the middle ages
    By alsih2o in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, 17th March, 2003, 01:47 AM
  4. Bar games of the middle ages...
    By Arravis in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Friday, 12th April, 2002, 03:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •