Charlaquin's latest activity

Because that’s how game rules work…? I don’t feel like “rulebooks should explain the rules clearly and explicitly” requires justification…

I’m open to that being possible, but it needs to be clearly and explicitly stated that this is the intent.

This distinction was a lot clearer in the 2014 rules, when being invisible was an entirely separate condition from being hidden. Being...

Oh, sorry, I had meant it wouldn’t have required a change from the way it worked in 2014. So the fact that it changed to no longer work...

It wouldn’t have required a change at all, visibility and detection were treated separately by the 2014 rules. They actually had to make...

I mean, it wasn’t defined as a condition, but this was basically how it worked prior to the 2024 revision. Being invisible made it so a...

The problem is, “some action that reveals you” is not fully defined. I mean, we know that attacking, casting a spell with a verbal...

Huh. That’s pretty much exactly how my group runs stealth in pretty much any d20 based game. Since before 4e came out, regardless of the...

Here's what's in the 4e Rules Compendium:

The final version probably ended up in the Essential books - the D&D Rules Compendium (2010), which seems to match the errata from what...

There are many assumptions in the 2024 Stealth rules to trip you up, but one of the actual oversights (and there are several of them in...

This one: It is probably a little too complex to fit 5e’s design aesthetic, especially early 5e, but it serves as a solid starting...

Again, there is no FUNCTIONAL difference between those two things.

Gleemax would have been the move, for sure

Regardless of how rocky the process of getting there was, my point is that they did eventually land on pretty much perfect stealth...