CreamCloud0's latest activity

i don't see why still being in that 'background lifestyle' would thus mean they shouldn't have the mechanical features of said...

okay, but that's not because it doesn't make sense for them not to have them, that's just on you and everyone else who neglects their...

Good thing this is 5th edition then and 1st is entirely irrelevant to the discussion

but the things i mentioned didn't come from neither class nor levels, species and background are things i would fundamentally expect...

I personally would not call it a WotC setting though. It's also not exactly a "5e" setting in its worldbuilding, because that...

I mean, there is one. It just came from The Edition That Must Not Be Named.

Really, I think this says it all right here. The problem with so many of the earlier settings is that 5 has added a LOT of options on...

So every edition you throw out all the lore and start fresh? That's IP suicide! I understand you hate D&D, but you're asking an...

It does beg the question: did Greyhawk not have dwarven wizards because that was an intrinsic part of the setting or was it because that...

Is it ever actually stated anywhere those things ‘aren’t for the normies’ or is that something you want to assume because most GMs...

Where do all the new 5.5 races come from? How do the new classes interact with the AD&D of it all? Dwarf wizards, what?!?

I think you’re getting too hung up on the idea of the mechanics being central. I believe what @Reynard is trying to get at is that any...

So just by way of example, one mechanical thing that is new in 5.5 that I think would impact the way we write D&D settings differently...

I don’t have the book either, but I have the same understanding. It’s not a setting, but a location, with only about 12 pages dedicated...

But they aren't new. ETA: specifically, they aren't designed with 5E as a root; the root is MtG. They are being shoeshorned into 5E no...