Lakesidefantasy's latest activity

You're entitled to do so. Player engagement is a spectrum, it does not require "extremely enthusiastic buy in" for a player to start...

i think the real question is how low do you need to take the magic to feel 'low magic', like, especially with only humans around how...

Yeah. They could use that or make another one. A non-magical Bard is also a possibility.

The setting would use fighter and rogue, the non-magical versions only. I know there's a non-magical ranger out there. That one would...

I don’t think it’s unachievable. Have you looked at the Exodus tabletop rules? They are still recognisably 5e despite having none of the...

If I could do it myself I wouldn’t need someone else to do it for me.

That idea is silly. The rules are deliberately generic so they can be easily customised, any setting designed around them would be...

That's reality for ya. I vote "round". Texture matters the most to me. The other two are flavors, and I leave that to the DM.

Sword and Sorcery as Crom intended!

True, but were there even wizards? I thought they were called Magic Users. Then again, there was a list of titles for your magic user...

There were no sorcerer’s in 1987. 🤐

I think it would be hard for an adventure to have a session 0 included in it. To me, a session 0 is something for DMs and players to...

I'm currently at the tail end of a Greyhawk campaign I've been running for a year. As commonly happens, we reached a point many levels...

If the red wavy lines obscure the map to the point of unreadability it might be one of the 1e-era SOLO modules (there's a BSOLO, two...

It was a great opportunity for WotC to introduce some of those tools into D&D. I used to love when each new Paizo AP would introduce a...