Minigiant's latest activity

It's 5e they wanted a billion from

I think the issue is that some people want to play non-traditional archetypes like the smart, wise, Barbarian chief or muscle wizard or...

I meant the later expected number WOTC wanted. WOTC thought 5e was a dead end and started with a low number. Then when it actually made...

Yes but I think the key issue is that every ability score doesn't matter to every class.

5e reached WOTC's 4e numbers in a different economy. Maybe. 5e didn't reach WOTC's 5e number.

SAD and MAD design both end up lock you into sameness unless you purposely designed the ability scores to prevent it

The issue is players not staying in their lane. D&D moved away from being a company of adventurers to small squads. So "redundant" PCs...

4e needed tech to handle the fiddly bits. A year in 4e got really fiddly because the easy stuff was handled in the 1st set of core...

It thinks that the Martial Caster divide is solved by determining which 3? "Powers" each martial has. Then giving them a scaling class...

I did not say 2e was a failure. Im saying after time and poor decisions it became one. I.e. not an edition issue,

To make and have unique experiences with the same class. It's basically, 2 wizard players can play different types of wizard because...

Mostly at the edges. Dexterity is still Initiative and a stupidly large number of skills, and has been for as long as there have been...

In my experience, it comes down to two things: 1- "Martial" classes (ie, ones that are intended to solve problems with more mundane...

No you don't. Like I said before, the Barbarian, Fighters, and Monks (I'll use the Playtest term Warrior Group) are balanced with...

It's sensible but annoying to track