I don't feel like these discussions are particularly useful or achieve their intended purpose, mostly because they lack nuance. Usually they just result in folks pointing out the obvious and congratulating themselves on their ability to perceive the wrongs of the past. Don't get me wrong, that's important, but in and of itself it isn't especially important.
If we really want to learn from the mistakes of the past we need to examine them far more critically and ask why they were present in the first place. We need to be willing to admit our own culpability (either personal or by class) as well as ask tough questions about our hobby, its industry and its fans.
For example, let's talk about that harlots table. Let's examine the inclusion, asking not only why it was there but also why it took the form it did. Let's look at those terms in the context of the author and the fans of the time. Let's look at the response to it and find out when it was disavowed and under what circumstances.
All that takes work and a willingness to do more than agree that a bad thing is bad. Are folks participating in this thread willing to do that work for all the problematic bits of D&D -- old and new; I don't know why we are giving WotC a pass. I doubt it and so I don't forsee a valuable, educational discussion.