Luke Crane Resigns From Kickstarter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kickstarter's Head of Community (and the creator of The Burning Wheel RPG) has resigned after public criticism with the way he launched a project on the platform last month.

jsUiD5vf.jpeg


Kickstarter told Polygon that "After a discussion about what is best for Kickstarter and our team, we came to the mutual decision with Luke Crane for him to leave Kickstarter. We recognize the many years of work Luke has done to help bring creative projects to life at Kickstarter and we are committed to ensure continued support for our team and for our backer and creator community through this moment of change."

Crane used to be involved with the games side of Kickstarter, but more recently has been Head of Community. The current Director of Games Outreach at Kickstarter is Anya Combs, who has been in place for over a year.


The Perfect RPG was an anthology of tabletop RPGs from a variety of creators. Amongst those creators was Dungeon World's Adam Koebel, whose livestream was cancelled in 2020 after including a non-consensual sexual assault scene. Several designers withdrew their support for The Perfect RPG when they only found out after the project was launched that Koebel was involved, and Crane cancelled the project amidst a great deal of criticism, claiming that the creators were harassed into withdrawing their support (a claim which several creators have said is untrue). The list of creators has since been removed and replaced with the words "Redacted to reduce future harassment".

His most recent update on the cancelled project is an apology to those affected.


Hello.

I apologize for such a long silence in the wake of the project launch last month. I’ve been in a lot of conservations, and doing a lot of listening. I waited to post anything because I wanted to be sure to be as thoughtful and considered as possible:

When we began the Perfect RPG project, my only goal was to launch a small collection of micro-games designed by my friends and others whose work I respect in the community. On the day it launched, while the project was falling apart, I did not fully understand what was at stake and what had happened—in the shock of the moment my communications were insensitive and desultory.

So here and now I wish to unequivocally apologize to you, and everyone affected, for the harm I’ve done to the community with this project. I am grateful for your input over the last month, and have done my best to listen with an open heart. I thank you for sharing your opinions and feelings, and know that I have violated the trust you placed in me. I am sincerely, deeply regretful.

In creating the project, I made a series of missteps and miscalculations that added up to a gross oversight on my part and, accordingly, I am fully responsible for the current situation and its effects. So I would like to add some clarification around some of the particular points raised, in the hope that it will help the community as a whole move forward in a productive way: There was no deceit, deception or bad faith in any of my actions around the project. I understand that I should have disclosed the participant list to all contributors beforehand, and I feel terrible that my poor planning placed some creators in a difficult position. Likewise with the unusual order in which contributors were listed—I was seeking to highlight the first creator on the list, who was my primary playtester for this project. In hindsight this was a poor idea that came off as duplicitous, for which I apologize.

The Indie RPG community is close-knit and passionate—it is one of the things I've loved the most about being a member. I have worked for 20 years to build and advocate for this community and expand it past its roots. It is very much my life’s work. To see it hurt through my actions has been devastating. Therefore I am now doing my best to repair the harm I have caused and make restitution to anyone negatively affected by my actions.

I recognize that this statement reflects an as-yet incomplete understanding of the impact of my actions, and only a start to making things right. I am actively looking for other ways to redress the wrong I’ve done. To begin this process, I have reached out to all the contributors of the project and I am in discussions with them, listening to their perspectives and asking them for input. I hope that with their help, and the help of this gaming community, I can demonstrate my continued commitment to building better games for all of us.

Sincerely,

—Luke
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

G

Guest 7025638

Guest
Er, just a heads-up here...the problem you might be unwittingly sailing into is that the person you're arguing with is this site's owner; and as such - like it or not - he to some extent can tell you what to do.
I know exactly who he is, and what we’re talking about (and how) is far from that said extent.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



darjr

I crit!
Did you literally just order me not to say something while defending your own right to say what you want? Is somebody going jump out from behind a plant pot and reveal I'm being Punked or something?
Me! It's going to be me! .... now if only I knew what to put in the pot ....
 


darjr

I crit!
It probably would have been had he (1) not marketed himself as a safe and inclusive streamer, and (2) appropriately apologized and recognized what he did.
I don't think so, he proved to be unsafe. His apology was, to me, insincere. I would NOT want anyone working with me on a project to be exposed to him. Flat out.

He does still work for Peter Adkison on the Chaldea comic doesn't he? If so he's working there.
 


Arguing for and defending an abuser to be let off the hook while at the same time arguing that people who might be working with said abuser SHOULDNT be told that they are working with said abuser is problematic.

After this comment, i went online to read what happened. Particularly, i was curious about why the term abuser was used.

Now that i have:

It would have already been a serious issue if it had happened privately, at the table.

The fact that it was done while streaming makes it even more serious.

However i think a conversation is needed about this new medium of streaming. And what boundaries/expectations need to be drawn/set befofe starting such a creative endeavour with a group.

i recently found out about what Bertolucci and Brando did in Last Tango. Instead of landing Brando and Bertolucci a prison sentence, the film won awards and got nominated for Oscars...


The reason i'm mentioning it is because there's different levels of abusive behaviour. Putting them all in the same bracket of "abuser" isn't helpful, i don't think.

Going back to AK, I'm not going to downplay what the guy did in this instance.
But if you're going to assume that particular stance that i put in a quote for his behaviour, what would you expect for someone that is on the sex offender register? Surely the severity is not the same, i mean was he convicted of a crime? Should he be, in your opinion?

I do think we should scrutinise media, and creators. The music industry, and the movie industry are big ones, who are in dire need of proper scrutiny. Media outlets. (Media ownership, and how that impacts our frail democracies. But i digress). That doesn't mean that the smaller ones should be free of scrutiny, either.

But i'm not sure that automatically assuming the position of outrage and "burn them at the stake" attirude is the right approach either. People make mistakes. We all do. We need to be able to talk about it. Demonising people isn't the answer, I don't think.
 
Last edited:

darjr

I crit!
I think there were a lot of people hoping that he would see, really see, and make amends, to become a better person. His behavior after let a lot of those folks down. There are other things that have come to light after as well. As with Hollywood we only see the iceberg above the waters. It is THE reason people are so adamant and reluctant to work with him and now possibly Luke. It's because they did not seem to take what happened seriously. Almost the opposite in both cases. Anyway I'm totally on board with redemption. But there needs to be some, really be there.
 

ShinHakkaider

Adventurer
Yes. It should have been a topic for like a week, not for a year (and more..).
Luke...Luke Crane? Is that you?!?
After this comment, i went online to read what happened. Particularly, i was curious about why the term abuser was used.

Now that i have:

It would have already been a serious issue if it had happened privately, at the table.

The fact that it was done while streaming makes it even more serious.

However i think a conversation is needed about this new medium of streaming. And what boundaries/expectations need to be drawn/set befofe starting such a creative endeavour with a group.

i recently found out about what Bertolucci and Brando did in Last Tango. Instead of landing Brando and Bertolucci a prison sentence, the film won awards and got nominated for Oscars...


I'm not going to downplay what the guy did.
But if you're going to assume that particular stance that i put in a quote for his behaviour, what would you expect for someone that is on the sex offender register? Surely the severity is not the same, i mean was he convicted of a crime? Should he be, in your opinion?

I do think we should scrutinise media, and creators. The music industry, and the movie industry are big ones, who are in dire need of proper scrutiny. Media outlets. (Media ownership, and how that impacts our frail democracies. But i digress). That doesn't mean that the smaller ones should be free of scrutiny, either.

But i'm not sure that automatically assuming the position of outrage and "burn them at the stake" attirude is the right approach either. People make mistakes. We all do. We need to be able to talk about it. Demonising people isn't the answer, I don't think.
I used the word abuser not because he committed a crime or should be charged with one. I used the word because this was someone who marketed himself as safe and promoted safety and inclusiveness at TTRPG tables and within the community at large.

What he did on that stream wasn't spur of the moment. There's a video out there on youtube where the young lady who was the player in that scenario states that Adam asked her about her PC's and possible story directions for her PC in the future. He knew what he was going to do before he did it and KNEW that his players if asked before hand would have objected to what he was going to do.

THAT'S why I called him an abuser. And THAT'S why he caught and still continues to catch flak for what he did. That and his non apology. And yes had it been at a private table it still would have been messed up and wrong. But this was done live on stream on a fairly popular streamed game. The faces of the other players during the stream says it all. They were stunned by what happened. Especially coming from Koebel.

And as far as "mistakes" and "forgiveness" goes?

It's my experience that people who like pushing boundaries and then do "non-apologies" are not to be trusted. AT ALL. Because for them? It's just them testing boundaries to see what they can get away with next time. Typical narc behavior.

You can usually tell the difference between them and the people who are legitimately apologetic and want to do the work not to make the same kind of mistake again.

Koebel is the FORMER. Not the Latter.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top