D&D General "Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D

Would much be lost if some of these problematic works were just discontinued? No warning labels, no ammendments. Just removed?

It seems to me that with the same effort that would go into 'fixing' these works, you could create something entirely new that has none of the baggage.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zardnaar

Legend
Would much be lost if some of these problematic works were just discontinued? No warning labels, no ammendments. Just removed?

It seems to me that with the same effort that would go into 'fixing' these works, you could create something entirely new that has none of the baggage.

Probably not. A few people salty usual suspects.

I would prefer they didn't I might want to buy them one day for whatever reason. Also goes against that support every edition a while back thing they had going on.

I missed a lot of product back in the day so never got a chance to read it.

Might ready own it I forget what GAZ pdfs I do own. Eventually want to get them all along with the B, X,C,M,I series which I haven't completed.

That's just me though wouldn't be to super salty but don't like being told what I'm allowed to read or not.
 

Would much be lost if some of these problematic works were just discontinued? No warning labels, no ammendments. Just removed?
I think this is the big question really. Sometimes stuff does just disappear. Like the early series of Doctor Who, for no reason other than the videotape was recycled. And consider the product under discussion here, which I haven't read, and don't want to read. It sounds like a really poor quality piece of work with no intrinsic value, irrespective of the issues. Is it worth going to any effort to save it for posterity?

On the other hand, one can't help but think of piles of burning books, which historically has not been a good thing.

Which is why I'm sitting firmly on the fence, despite the splinters up my backside.
 

Zardnaar

Legend
I think this is the big question really. Sometimes stuff does just disappear. Like the early series of Doctor Who, for no reason other than the videotape was recycled. And consider the product under discussion here, which I haven't read, and don't want to read. It sounds like a really poor quality piece of work with no intrinsic value, irrespective of the issues. Is it worth going to any effort to save it for posterity?

On the other hand, one can't help but think of piles of burning books, which historically has not been a good thing.

Which is why I'm sitting firmly on the fence, despite the splinters up my backside.

There's probably a few hardcopies floating around.

Ouch surprisingly expensive on eBay.
 


MGibster

Legend
In an earlier post, one ENWorlder referred to GAZ10 as "Garbage Pail Kids." Note: the Garbage Pail Kids came out in 1985, in the same era as GAZ10. Others have mentioned "Looney Toons." I feel both of those are spot on. GAZ10 has a "gross" Garbage Pail Kids vibe, plus a zany Looney Toons vibe...plus (unfortunately) Looney Toons' 1940s racial stereotypes. Even Garbage Pail Kids (probably) stayed away from racial stereotypes.
Specifically I referred to the name Chief Sitting Drool as a name that sounded like it could belong to a Garbage Pail Kid and probably the least offensive joke in the book. And, no, I don't consider that particular joke to be a racial stereotype.
 


Zardnaar

Legend
Specifically I referred to the name Chief Sitting Drool as a name that sounded like it could belong to a Garbage Pail Kid and probably the least offensive joke in the book. And, no, I don't consider that particular joke to be a racial stereotype.

Insulting to the individual in a ham fisted 80's satire way?

They're mocking Sitting Bull?
 



Remove ads

Top