Search results

If you are referring to the OGL, it was released after Hasbro had already acquired WotC and D&D.

What do you mean by more stufff? If you're talking about the fact that Level Up has more stuff than 5e, I'm aware, I have the game. In my question I was talking about an SRD for Level Up, not for 5e. Or did you mean something else?

I apologize for what is probably a dumb question. What you are trying to do is to produce an SRD for A5e in which the text is not a derivative product of the 5.1 SRD; is that correct?

But if someone stops subscribing from Paizo, you keep all the books (and the PDFs) that you bought. It's a big difference. The Paizo model is more like a traditional magazine subscription, except that you pay as you go. The WotC model is like streaming services. That's what I was saying.

Point being I was talking specifically about a specific thing you wrote. You were simply misremembering a video you probably saw only once a year and half ago. No big deal. I misremember stuff all the time.

I was refuting your point about access to all the rules being free according to that video. Nothing more.

Paizo subscriptions are very different though. You subscribe to a certain line of products and you basically auto-buy each new release them and you get a free PDF included.

They proposed making characters for free, but full access to the rules would require a subscription. I can send you the whole video if you want.

In that video they proposed a subscription to get access to the full rules.

I'm wondering, or rather I should say hoping, if there's a pro-OGL "faction" within WotC management and if they might use the survey as a tool to try and push their view.

Further proof that rouge is almost as old as the game itself...

The list of publishers is nice, but - IMHO - it is not too meaningful until we see the license itself and what material each publisher will release under it.

The 5e versions. The others are not affected by the OGL.

That was my thought as well. it would explain the delays in the marketing campaign and the general lack of information.

Personally, OGL or not, I've got zero interest in playing in this glorious digital environment.

Yes, I'm not happy about the store at all. The one good thing I can say about it, is that I've been reimbursed shipping costs, since the EU store now also has free shipping.

In all my years of playing AD&D, I never, even once, found myself in a situation in which I wasn't sure how to apply a modifier to AC.

Well, Codega twitted that they asked some "pointed questions", so it's likely that the OGL question was raised.

This seems a bit dismissive... ;) I appreciate the design of AW, but I'm not interested in the experience it provides except for the occasional one-off.

The introduction to the draft contains the following text: This seems a strong indication that they are planning to allow 3PPs to publish on DDB in some form.