Search results

Okay, that's fair. And I am doubtful Bleds felt any moral obligation to do so. At this point I assume this is about maintaining the perception of value with the IP

Question, does 2 not contradict 1? That would be my reading.

That there is a Junior and a II might complicate that? I don't think I've ever seen a naming lineage with a Junior and a II.... :)

Pardon my ignorance here, but I thought I'd seen statements that Senior did not agree with Junior in these parts. Do you recall any sources on this?

I'd love to see a citation or two for this.

Crap Dagwood's fail. Anything bigger than a crap BLT requires skill few using the technique have.

I was speaking more to the VHS? (it's been a minute, I'm fiuzzy and can't remember the product name ) based board-game

I agree with this. I am of the age that I saw the movie in the theatre and watched the TV Show in reruns for a long while. Got excited by Defenders of the Earth, etc... I was excited for this one. Though they went... places. And later, the comics serial-based set deserves reexamination.

In my part of the country, most of the muck-raking involving Lorraine I heard were of the "legal embezzlement" variety, which I'd love to hear an opposing side of the story. I enjoyed both versions of the Buck Rogers products, even if both were wonky in their own ways. The video-based games is...

But sometimes it is. I used to work for a place before this AI boom that was on the front end of using large models for recognition of patterns in images for sciency purposes. The training data was largely highly proprietary digital imagery owned by the client. That is very copyrightable.

With the right roll on the right crit table....

My copy of this dissappeared a few years ago, it was part of my "bad examples" game collection. My memory of it was it was a little too kind to the Nazis, even with it being a rebellion game..

For Faerie, Queen, and Country and Galactos barrier were interesting.

I honestly had higher hopes that there would be a mention of the books..

It is indeed the Kafer sourcebook.

Wow. Now that's a reference.

That seems in line with what I remember paying for lead 25 years ago at that scale.... If anything, these may be too inexpensive.

Ah. I think I read that backwards. I've only found digital of the 78 rules in that little wormhole.

Allegedly, you're looking for this. https://www.ebay.com/itm/297230619718 Disproportionately expensive compared to other issues. Probably for this reason. :) Related thread: Anybody remember the "Warlock" supplement?

It was the 80s, man!