Search results

it as a concept if not by name still stands it can be reborn as soon as we have substance to it, it needs definition in areas and to be made cool that is all it takes. doubt it could sell a book all by itself but I got eberron for the artificers the rest was just cool stuff

those are pure mechanics we likely do not have the conceptual space for 4 more casters to occupy. those casting class slots assume the mechanics for them could be refined to the desirable point.

the mechanics are not well built for it you can do a lot of things does not mean you can do it well, that and the adventure types would need to be refined. what are the plots in these things beyond the romance aspect anyway? which 3-4 classes do you mean more or less?

my contemporaries and younger have tried to make "chat"one

improving the social aspect of the game is long desired but will take nothing sort of 6e to, my point is the more specific ideas of the setting the things we could do in principle tomorrow. I do wonder if the designers simply do not care? whenever you describe the factions mechanics always...

I can understand the desire to have a more clear definition of psionic classes but do the others have much of a better definition? tell me people who can describe the dnd class of druid both rapidly, clearly and without having to directly reference itself? dune has mind powers and was...

something are a class because to do the concept it needs a full class or it will just suck. romantacy is a poor fit for how dnd is built and also has world-building worse than Harry Potter, some ideas are stealable sure but not much is worth taking as it is simply incompatible concept-wise, it...

the first sounds like jargon, literal semantics why would I care what they call the rose it equally smells of nothing. no overlap is hard and very costly I would prefer less overlap in what the casted abilities do just so wizards do not steal all of it again. the guys who only want one are...

okay, so what do you mean by theme? the overall theme or each subclass theme? I can tell you each subclass as I see it, mind, body, kinesis, soul, freaky stuff. with some others

I thought it was agreed that meta plots suck by the 00's?

are the factions defined by mechanics or thematic? are they about crunch or fluff? as what the arguments are about says a lot about how to solve it?

we do not need druid or barbarian or anything beyond 4 classes. we do not need and but humans. we do not even technically need any leisure activity.

battlemind would work as a start for a psychic half caster(like paladins or rangers)but need a better name badly a wizard dabbling in psionics would be a viable sub-class I assume that is what is meant by cerebremancer? sad yes but I doubt we would get more than one full psychic spell caster...

my point is we are unlikely to get more than one psionic caster class(if we are lucky we would also get a half caster) thus I was thinking more of merging the ardent and the psion together as they should not be too difficult to do?

I was onder the assumption the ardent and the psion where different classes yes

sorry whenever I hear egregore I think of the fungus from Destiny. no idea whether we would even be able to get one psionic class let alone two ardent and psion where different in the past. yes we need at least something to have that mind armour as an option

if tulpas are to be used I want reference to the concept real history as it was derived from a meditation technique towards enlightenment, might as well let people learn something. he is basically perfect for the average dnd party

the different thematics could likely live with fairly well as different sub classes. mechanics and resources are far harder it should be one option just to make it, unlike wizards who have way too much of a consistent fashion taste. also the end point of a tattoo-covered esoteric is to become...

wait it just looks like minecraft

nah mine sucked I was less miserable. this the anime the french some how stuff up the name.