Search results

Almost all human beings are going to take you saying thier ideas suck the same as them sucking no matter how good you are at communicating. I've seen a lot of managers over the years heartbroken when they figure that out.

Probably about the time we started thinking of people as replaceable units in the corporate machinery instead of human beings and teaching everyone that the shareholders were more important than the company, our ethics, morals and all living life on earth.

I think RTD started out great and flamed out and that Chibnall was a train wreck. Moffat unfortunantly had to go and intentionally break ever single sacred cow of the show to make the point he was the director. Some fun episodes but he's a big part of the reason the show hasn't recovered ...

I find explaining to people the consequences of their current behavior and how it is working against them to work far better than punishing them. Punishing employees can generate short term behavioral changes but almost never generates long term changes. It's a waste of your time and their...

I'd limit it to natural poisons only allowed vs enemies of the balance but sure....

nice very long do it my way or hit the road. My previous statement stands. If the game is going well they'll want to sit and talk about it. If not your just back in High School being forced to talk about something that you weren't into to begin with.

We'll have to agree to disagree. I think the series would have been far better without them.

Avenger of the Green.

but since 1e there have been players that love that stuff. This is the problem with rules for everything. My game may not be ok for your players and your game may not be ok for my players. If a group of players want to play D&D (Paranoia Edition) more power to them.

OH god no. He killed the show with the absolute Narcississtic need to outdo himself every episode till it just felt stupid. I simply want good writers and a director that is ok just making good shows and hoping for great ones instead of trying so hard to make great ones he misfires more than...

I think some people that truly love the idea of sandbox play with no rules>not sure it could actually exist> get confused with the concept of Tyranny of Choices. Most people are overwhelmed by a large number of choices and sieze up and make no choice. It's so universal it's a serious part of...

problem is then it starts to feel like High School or a Job. If they want to stay everything is going well if you have to make them stay then why are they there?

I'd not call it ranger. Just take the sacred cow off the chopping block. But the idea is sound especially if you tie them to neutral to neutral evil Druidic Orders who want to take down monsters, hero's or any other enemies of the balance.

and with that welcome to section 13 or Star Trek Discovery. Or possibly Watchmen.

I'd expand that to dissonance between those how want one kind of a game vs the other. I've seen players ruin the game for each other because they weren't willing to compromise on their vision of the game they wanted. IT's not just GM's vs players. I know players who get bent out of shape if...

This is something the few who've never had to deal with the narcissist, or players that just push even when you draw your lines will never get. And sometimes it can be your friends, family, or coworkers just to make it even more uncomfortable. It was never lost people are the same now as...

True I'm mostly pointing out it's normal human behavior and some take it way too far. . I don't blame people for wanting to be awesome. Just too much awesome can be a pain, think a party of 5 Barney Stinsons. Even on player like that gets old fast if you are trying to do a group game.

Orrre statistically one out of 4 of the ones that get rolled should be. But I'd wager most +1 weapons placed in any game never get rolled. DM just says you get a +1 thingy