Search results

They're of course not revealing how the Pact of the Blade and associated invocations have changed. Everyone still wants to know, if it's 3 attacks at high levels.

-Switching spells on a long rest is useful, half of the time I felt picking the Ranger spells weren't going to be good choices either. At least you can get one that's effective to have for the day. -I guess the fighting styles opening up, does make the strength ranger more viable, as you can get...

But a Druid can pull rabbits out of their hats, with at least one of their summoning spells or Find Familiar or something.

A lot about the Necromancer might be about how they change Animate Dead, and they might need to start from scratch on the Necromancer.

I think the Artificer's core identity is strongly steampunk, rune magic stuff would be a secondary flavour like Urban Rangers and Urban Barbarians. Among changes I hope they do, give them the new True Strike as a cantrip or let them be the 2nd best (of the published by WotC classes Rangers...

I've wanted 5e to have Nethermancy back as a subclass of Wizard, I thought the Shadowcaster was a neat idea in 3.5e despite Tome of Magic being a failure in many ways. I'd see it as something between Illusionist and Necromancer much like how the War Mage is between Evoker and Abjurer. Or at...

Abjurer is the one type of Wizard I feel would bother to learn how to use Heavy Armor, but it would be at least 1 or 2 investments of feats to get (assuming single class Wizard). They'd probably have protective sigils written all over their armor.

I think there's quite a lot of differences between the Artificer subclasses, an Artillerist is quite different from the others. Maybe Battlesmith and Armorer are similiar, but they still play quite differently.

Looks more like a Tiefling female to me, even though they've canonically said back in 2e that Tieflings are more commonly intersex or non-binary (depending on ones interpretation) than other species.

Looks like we already got an example of Drizz't being in the PHB art, even if the picture isn't about him.

In my opinion it's Crodlu from Dark Sun and Chocobo being the same thing. A Crodlu sort of is a dinosaur, and a lot of dinosaurs actually had feathers.

I think it's going to be Xanathar's Guide to Everything (2025 edition).

The idea that Aquaman is only useful when he's near a body of water. It's been a reoccurring joke with the character.

I always thought of them more as a Druid that can use a bow, even though it's probably more of a Ranger/Druid mix. I guess the "Seeker" is more a multiclass build, but Primal Strike as something that adds Fire, Cold, Lightning or Thunder to a Bow attack would be key to what I saw in that...

That's a thread for next week when we get all of the classes.

It could be some spell like Moonbeam, but it doesn't really look like a pillar of moonlight.

I think that's actually the picture of Turn Undead in action, because they keep re-using that one.

The metal armor restriction was one of those things they should have done away with a while ago. 3e had ridiculous things to get around it, like Fullplate Wooden Armor.

I felt the Seeker class in 4e was unnecessary as a full class, but maybe picking "Warden" allows one to be more of a "Seeker", though they probably need some of those Ranger spells based on using arrows.

The "Aquaman Problem"