Search results

The question is, How is necromancer games able change the feel of the game without redefining anything. :erm:

High quality ink and paper. Thats about it

well anyone who fights with melee weapons is a fencer (or just swords, i forget) but regardless it a trivial complaint.

indeed. Also I think the knowledge is more accessible then it used to be. more and more documents are being translated, and authentic sword fighting is at the cusp of breaking into the US where before you had to study in Europe. Thats not to say you couldn't study in the US, it was just harder...

go half sword! (a style of German longsword).

I posted under white-wolf by accident. Its an old account. oops. Thats a very cool story. Right now I am in German longsword. Our school teaches both Italian and German, and i cant wait to try Italian after i learn more about the German sword fighting. I have been itching to freeplay against a...

you sir have just created a new kind of necromancer.

and possibly nudity. Fantasy without nudity... I will have non of that... and btw nudity is not porn. You would also not be able to do very realistic or believable middle ages/dark ages without gore, its also hard to do a good vampires without lots of gore. Alot of d7d vampires seem impotent...

as seen by a druid with shape change, and pit fiend with 60 ac. It was in interesting last battle in 3.5.

heres a question, why cant you use shift, pull, push and slide? does wizards own something about these words or concepts that would disallow one to be put in a ogl? the concepts are so basic and fundamental. I think its too vanilla to stake any legal claim to. Now if was called runicas...

i dont think a 4e srd ogl would need to come from only other ogl games. The other 20 to 10 percent are most likely going to be game mechanics. as long as you don't copy the text directly but state rules in your own words... maybe i missed the boat. am i wrong?

Just like Cthulhu? :mad: wizards description and visual imagery of a mind flayer is right out of Cuthulhu. The image of mind flayers are not protected but the name might.

I dont mean to cause trubble, but this is about the gsl and Amethyst. If wizards wants to change the gsl to say you cant remove races like elf, they can add that later and you would not be grandfathered in. i don't think the gsl is reasonable for any publisher to work under, and i hope you...

I don't believe you. are you being honest? My experiences have been the exact opposite. No female player I know would ever play a dragonborn without breasts. is your resident female gamer very logical or interested in biology? Just wondering because i can see how that view could occur, Its...

actually i found that ranged classes lack alot of good feat choices. My character will take all four by level 30

The warlock should have been a druid.

I hope it has an index and not just a search box

I think this would be an interesting alternative my idea. I was worried that wizards was just going to have the gsl and not really negotiate anything else. If you are right, i would be glad to see other options then the gsl.

they probably think if the gsl is only going to let you refer to the names of creatures and concepts, and using the gsl is more restrictive and takes away more rights and options then if its not used at all. They probably think that the rights given to make compatible products is flexible...

seconded