Search results

Another vote for the "new" versus simply "blended" abilities. Although I'll note: In some cases, it's nice to grab something from one class or another, but because it relies on levels in that particular class, it's not really of much/any use to the blended. Being able to "substitute" one of the...

Well Turn Undead already has the ability for Undead to be run off in fear as well as destroyed. If the cleric has twice as many levels as the undead's HD, they're simply destroyed. So all you're really missing is the first bit, that of non-clerics being able to hold off undead. Off the top of...

Oh, it's not quite that I have trouble wrapping my head around it... I started playing waaaaaay back in the day. I actually find the new 3.x way of doing it kinda confusing myself. I just happen to be a "Lazy GM" and like to have things run as quick as possible. Having a player make a roll and...

Errr... I didn't think I'd be doing that... lessee what sort of stupidity I get up to in the next quote response... Oh good lord no. I'm dumber than a sack full'a hammers. Here, I'll prove it and show off how I've never played a cleric either. Bear with me as I ramble aloud and flip around a...

You're missing the point of the OP. It's not just "reprint your stuff with a new logo". To be honest, most people either already have your product or they're not interested in it. Simply slapping a new logo on it isn't going to do diddly. On the other hand _expanding_ the product is a different...

Errr... why "here" exactly? I mean, the whole E6/E8/Ewhatever idea is just a houserule sorta thing, as opposed to a "Pathfinder" sort of thing. Yeah, you can use it in Pathfinder, but you can also do it in just about any "standard" d20 game. Having said that, here's a couple of threads for you...

Yeah, you can still get it from the forums: http://www.enworld.org/forum/2289968-post42.html Here's what he had to say about v6 last time I asked: Knock yourself out. :D

I think this is going to be one of the things I ignore from Trailblazer. As a Lazy GM, I've already got enough to worry about without rolling multiple saves like that. It's nice to hear the reasoning behind it though. I think I'm going to be bashing something back to look more like the SRD...

To a certain extent, I don't feel like changing because of the fans. I realize that's a strange reason to some folks, but as a social creature I look at a game and see what kind of folks are playing it. And then I ask myself, "Would I like to play with that person?" If the answer is "No", then...

No. It's got nothing to do with WotC, I've got zero interest in anything like the DDI.

And you'd probably get a whole bunch of people complaining about it. Lots of folks on the Paizo boards cited the lack of HD-BaB linking in ToS as being a problem and the thing they disliked about the book. For better or worse, there's a definite chunk of people that consider that to be a design...

I'm another one of those folks that likes to avoid the whole RealTimeStrategy resource management thing. Warlocks, Dragon Shamans... things where you can pick a power here and there and "assemble" your character as you go without having to track resources are great.

The first time you can take Critical focus is level 9. That's a +4 to confirm critical hits. In order to take Bleeding Critical you have to be level 11. A rogue is using a weapon with a wide crit range because they're relying on being able to get crit damage and SA. A Fighter is going for the...

Ah, well.... hmmm... right now, the first thing that springs to mind would be something talking about how incorporating Trailblazer's fixes to 3.5 would interact with Fantasy Concepts. Also, talking about how to take some of the things seen in Pathfinder SRD (class abilities) looks when taken to...

So... is this thread actually going to be a hate-on for rpg.net like I initially thought it was, or are people going to also go along with the OP's other suggestion? For example, my post about the ability for Fighters to have a chance to dish out big damage under Beta being pulled out, but...

Fair enough. I saw some pretty stupid things in that thread too... and a number of people pointed out where folks were wrong about a bunch of their complaints too. That whole "flooding the world" thing for example... there was some stupidity. Especially since even I know a Decanter of Endless...

Errrr....no, my understanding is you were given a 1 day suspension for violation of RPG.net policy and that was then turned into a permaban based on an email that you sent. You might not like the rules, but if you're posting to a forum you've got to expect to follow them or face consequences...

As a guy that spends his time between both places... you're wrong. There's just as much love for Pathfinder and folks going on about how awesome it is and how it fixes all their problems as there is hate. The thread in specific that's being mentioned was actually _marked_ as a negative thread...

Errr...sorta. Flynn went through a ton of books and pulled all the OGC content that seemed to have inspired various Star Wars Saga rules and then compiled them together with an eye towards doing S&S style fantasy games. Trailblazer and FC sort of tackle a number of the same problems, but from...

I'm thinking of simply lifting a number of the Rogue's Talents from Pathfinder:Rogue Depending on how you plan on setting up/running your game (Pathfinder as the base or Trailblazer), you've got some flexibility. If you're using Pathfinder as a base, you could have a 3 tier system: Fighter can...